Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Alan Peterson
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Brent Alan Peterson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NBLP. Uses Ballotpedia almost entirely as a singular source, and what information isn't sourced to it uses thegreenpapers.com, which appears to be no more useful in providing notability than Ballotpedia. Google returns no news articles, sans a couple providing voting results (although I can't even find him on these) SmittenGalaxy | talk! 06:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Politics, and United States of America. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 06:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Support nomination rationale. The sources used are not reliable to pass notability guidelines. Search result failed to turn up any useful failing WP:GNG. A mere announcement of a presidential run does not bring notability by default. Mekomo (talk) 13:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Article does not meet up Artiste notability guide as stated above, weavil words and promotional statements are flying around the article too. Tesleemah (talk) 14:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Total spam, utter failure of WP:GNG on top of that. JeffSpaceman (talk) 15:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Article claims nothing about him that would be "inherently" notable without WP:GNG-worthy reliable sourcing for it, but the article contains absolutely no GNG-worthy reliable sourcing whatsoever. Bearcat (talk) 17:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails basic notability guidelines. Alexeyevitch(talk) 07:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.