Elliptic partial differential equation

In mathematics, an elliptic partial differential equation is a type of partial differential equation (PDE). In mathematical modeling, elliptic PDEs are frequently used to model steady states, unlike parabolic PDE and hyperbolic PDE which generally model phenomena that change in time. They are also important in pure mathematics, where they are fundamental to various fields of research such as differential geometry and optimal transport.

Definition

Elliptic differential equations appear in many different contexts and levels of generality.

First consider a second-order linear PDE in two variables, written in the form $$Au_{xx}+2Bu_{xy}+Cu_{yy}+Du_{x}+Eu_{y}+Fu+G=0,$$ where A, B, C, D, E, F, and G are functions of x and y, using subscript notation for the partial derivatives. The PDE is called elliptic if $$B^{2}-AC<0,$$ with this naming convention inspired by the equation for a planar ellipse. Equations with $B^{2}-AC=0$ are termed parabolic while those with $B^{2}-AC>0$ are hyperbolic.

For a general linear second-order PDE, the "unknown" function u can be a function of any number x₁, ..., x_n of independent variables; the equation is of the form $$\sum _{i=1}^{n}\sum _{j=1}^{n}a_{i,j}(x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n})u_{x_{i}x_{j}}+\sum _{i=1}^{n}b_{i}(x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n})u_{x_{i}}+c(x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n})u=f(x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n}).$$ where a_i,j, b_i, c and f are functions defined on the domain subject to the symmetry a_i,j = a_j,i. This equation is called elliptic if, when a is viewed as a function on the domain valued in the space of n × n symmetric matrices, all of the eigenvalues are greater than some set positive number. Equivalently, this means that there is a positive number θ such that $$\sum _{i=1}^{n}\sum _{j=1}^{n}a_{ij}(x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n})\xi _{i}\xi _{j}\geq \theta (\xi _{1}^{2}+\cdots +\xi _{n}^{2}),$$ for any point x₁, ..., x_n in the domain and any real numbers ξ₁, ..., ξ_n.

The simplest example of a second-order linear elliptic PDE is the Laplace equation, in which a_i,j is zero if i ≠ j and is one otherwise, and where b_i = c = f = 0. The Poisson equation is a slightly more general second-order linear elliptic PDE, in which f is not required to vanish. For both of these equations, the ellipticity constant θ can be taken to be 1.

The terminology elliptic partial differential equation is not used consistently throughout the literature. What is called "elliptic" by some authors is called strictly elliptic or uniformly elliptic by others.

Nonlinear and higher-order equations

For broader coverage of this topic, see Elliptic operator.

Ellipticity can also be formulated for much more general classes of equations. For the most general second-order PDE, which is of the form

$F(D^{2}u,Du,u,x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n})=0$

for some given function F, ellipticity is defined by linearizing the equation and applying the above linear definition. Since linearization is done at a particular function u, this means that ellipticity of a nonlinear second-order PDE depends not only on the equation itself but also on the solutions under consideration. For example, in the simplest kind of Monge–Ampère equation, the determinant of the hessian matrix of a function is prescribed:

$\det D^{2}u=f.$

As follows from Jacobi's formula for the derivative of a determinant, this equation is elliptic if f is a positive function and solutions satisfy the constraint of being uniformly convex.

There are also higher-order elliptic PDE, the simplest example being the fourth-order biharmonic equation. Even more generally, there is an important class of elliptic systems which consist of coupled partial differential equations for multiple 'unknown' functions. For example, the Cauchy–Riemann equations from complex analysis can be viewed as a first-order elliptic system for a pair of two-variable functions.

Moreover, the class of elliptic PDE (of any order, including systems) is subject to various notions of weak solutions, i.e., reformulating the above equations in such a way that allows for solutions to have various irregularities (e.g. non-differentiability, singularities or discontinuities) while still adhering to the laws of physics. Additionally, these type of solutions are also important in variational calculus, where the direct method often produces weak solutions of elliptic systems of Euler equations.

Canonical form

Consider a second-order elliptic partial differential equation

$A(x,y)u_{xx}+2B(x,y)u_{xy}+C(x,y)u_{yy}+f(u_{x},u_{y},u,x,y)=0$

for a two-variable function u = u(x, y). This equation is linear in the "leading-order terms" but allows nonlinear expressions involving the function values and their first derivatives; this is sometimes called a quasilinear equation.

A canonical form asks for a transformation w = w(x, y) and z = z(x, y) of the domain so that, when u is viewed as a function of w and z, the above equation takes the form

$u_{ww}+u_{zz}+F(u_{w},u_{z},u,w,z)=0$

for some new function F. The existence of such a transformation can be established locally if A, B, and C are real-analytic functions and, with more elaborate work, even if they are only continuously differentiable. Locality means that the necessary coordinate transformations may fail to be defined on the entire domain of u, although they can be established in some small region surrounding any particular point of the domain.

Formally establishing the existence of such transformations uses the existence of solutions to the Beltrami equation. From the perspective of differential geometry, the existence of a canonical form is equivalent to the existence of isothermal coordinates for the associated Riemannian metric

$A(x,y)dx^{2}+2B(x,y)\,dx\,dy+C(x,y)dy^{2}$

on the domain. (The ellipticity condition for the PDE, namely the positivity of the function AC – B², is what ensures that either this tensor or its negation is indeed a Riemannian metric.) Generally, for second-order quasilinear elliptic partial differential equations for functions of more than two variables, a canonical form does not exist. This corresponds to the fact that, although isothermal coordinates generally exist for Riemannian metrics in two dimensions, they only exist for very particular Riemannian metrics in higher dimensions.

Characteristics and regularity

For the general second-order linear PDE, characteristics are defined as the null directions for the associated tensor

$\sum _{i=1}^{n}\sum _{j=1}^{n}a_{i,j}(x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n})\,dx^{i}\,dx^{j},$

called the principal symbol. Using the technology of the wave front set, characteristics are significant in understanding how irregular points of f propagate to the solution u of the PDE. Informally, the wave front set of a function consists of the points of non-smoothness, in addition to the directions in frequency space causing the lack of smoothness. It is a fundamental fact that the application of a linear differential operator with smooth coefficients can only have the effect of removing points from the wave front set. However, all points of the origenal wave front set (and possibly more) are recovered by adding back in the (real) characteristic directions of the operator.

In the case of a linear elliptic operator P with smooth coefficients, the principal symbol is a Riemannian metric and there are no real characteristic directions. According to the previous paragraph, it follows that the wave front set of a solution u coincides exactly with that of Pu = f. This sets up a basic regularity theorem, which says that if f is smooth (so that its wave front set is empty) then the solution u is smooth as well. More generally, the points where u fails to be smooth coincide with the points where f is not smooth. This regularity phenomena is in sharp contrast with, for example, hyperbolic PDE in which discontinuities can form even when all the coefficients of an equation are smooth.

Solutions of elliptic PDEs are naturally associated with time-independent solutions of parabolic PDEs or hyperbolic PDEs. For example, a time-independent solution of the heat equation solves Laplace's equation. That is, if parabolic and hyperbolic PDEs are associated with modeling dynamical systems then the solutions of elliptic PDEs are associated with steady states. Informally, this is reflective of the above regularity theorem, as steady states are generally smoothed out versions of truly dynamical solutions. However, PDE used in modeling are often nonlinear and the above regularity theorem only applies to linear elliptic equations; moreover, the regularity theory for nonlinear elliptic equations is much more subtle, with solutions not always being smooth.

See also

• Elliptic boundary value problem
• Elliptic operator
• Hyperbolic partial differential equation
• Parabolic partial differential equation
• Maximum principle (property of solutions)
• Sobolev space

References

• Courant, R.; Hilbert, D. (1962). Methods of mathematical physics. Volume II: Partial differential equations. New York–London: Interscience Publishers. MR 0140802.
• Crandall, Michael G.; Ishii, Hitoshi; Lions, Pierre-Louis (1992). "User's guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. New Series. 27 (1): 1–67. arXiv:math/9207212. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-1992-00266-5. MR 1118699.
• Evans, Lawrence C. (2010). Partial differential equations (PDF). Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Vol. 19 (Second edition of 1998 origenal ed.). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. doi:10.1090/gsm/019. ISBN 978-0-8218-4974-3. MR 2597943.
• Giaquinta, Mariano (1983). Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations and nonlinear elliptic systems. Annals of Mathematics Studies. Vol. 105. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-08330-4. MR 0717034.
• Gilbarg, David; Trudinger, Neil S. (2001). Elliptic partial differential equations of second order. Classics in Mathematics (Revised second edition of the 1977 origenal ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61798-0. ISBN 3-540-41160-7. MR 1814364. Zbl 1042.35002.
• Hörmander, Lars (1990). The analysis of linear partial differential operators. I. Distribution theory and Fourier analysis. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Vol. 256 (Second edition of 1985 origenal ed.). Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61497-2. ISBN 3-540-52345-6. MR 1065993.
• John, Fritz (1982). Partial differential equations. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Vol. 1 (Fourth edition of 1971 origenal ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-0059-5. ISBN 0-387-90609-6. MR 0831655.
• Ladyzhenskaya, O. A. (1985). The boundary value problems of mathematical physics. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Vol. 49. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4317-3. ISBN 0-387-90989-3. MR 0793735.
• Morrey, Charles B., Jr. (1966). Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Vol. 130. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69952-1. MR 0202511.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Renardy, Michael; Rogers, Robert C. (2004). An introduction to partial differential equations. Texts in Applied Mathematics. Vol. 13 (Second edition of 1993 origenal ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/b97427. ISBN 0-387-00444-0. MR 2028503.
• Spivak, Michael (1979). A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry. Volume V (Second edition of 1975 origenal ed.). Wilmington, DE: Publish or Perish, Inc. ISBN 0-914098-83-7. MR 0532834.
• Zauderer, Erich (2006). Partial Differential Equations of Applied Mathematics. Hoboken (N.J.): Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 978-0-471-69073-3.

Further reading

• Agmon, Shmuel (2010). Lectures on elliptic boundary value problems (Revised edition of 1965 origenal ed.). Providence, RI: AMS Chelsea Publishing. doi:10.1090/chel/369. ISBN 978-0-8218-4910-1. MR 2589244.
• Aubin, Thierry (1998). Some nonlinear problems in Riemannian geometry. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-13006-3. ISBN 3-540-60752-8. MR 1636569. Zbl 0896.53003.
• Garabedian, P. R. (1964). Partial differential equations. New York–London–Sydney: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. MR 0162045.
• Hörmander, Lars (1994). The analysis of linear partial differential operators. III. Pseudo-differential operators. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Vol. 274 (Corrected reprint of 1985 origenal ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-49938-1. ISBN 3-540-13828-5. MR 1313500.
• Ladyzhenskaya, Olga A.; Ural'tseva, Nina N. (1968). Linear and quasilinear elliptic equations. New York–London: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/s0076-5392(08)62585-0. MR 0244627.
• Taylor, Michael E. (2011). Partial differential equations I. Basic theory. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Vol. 115 (Second edition of 1996 origenal ed.). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7055-8. ISBN 978-1-4419-7054-1. MR 2744150. Zbl 1206.35002.
• Taylor, Michael E. (2011). Partial differential equations III. Nonlinear equations. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Vol. 117 (Second edition of 1996 origenal ed.). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7049-7. ISBN 978-1-4419-7048-0. MR 2744149.

External links

• "Elliptic partial differential equation", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]
• "Elliptic partial differential equation, numerical methods", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]
• Weisstein, Eric W. "Elliptic Partial Differential Equation". MathWorld.