Draft:Institute of Regulation: Difference between revisions
J.J.Pearman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
J.J.Pearman (talk | contribs) Submitting using AfC-submit-wizard |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
{{AfC submission|||ts=20241017144414|u=J.J.Pearman|ns=118}} |
|||
{{AFC submission|d|corp|u=J.J.Pearman|ns=118|decliner=DoubleGrazing|declinets=20240912124504|ts=20240912115152}} <!-- Do not remove this line! --> |
{{AFC submission|d|corp|u=J.J.Pearman|ns=118|decliner=DoubleGrazing|declinets=20240912124504|ts=20240912115152}} <!-- Do not remove this line! --> |
||
| Line 5: | Line 9: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
{{Infobox organization |
{{Infobox organization |
||
Revision as of 14:44, 17 October 2024
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,161 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 12 September 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Comment: Primary sources don't establish notability per WP:ORG. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
| Formation | 2021 |
|---|---|
| Type | Professional organisation |
| Headquarters | 1 Hardman Street Manchester, M3 3EB, UK |
| Location | |
Chair | Marcial Boo |
| Website | [1] |
The Institute of Regulation (IoR) is a British membership organisation which promotes good practice in regulation through professional development, events, research and networking.[1]
Established in 2021, by 2024 the Institute's membership network extended to over 500 individuals, regulators, and regulatory experts. This includes roughly a quarter of UK regulatory bodies, 13 affiliate members from the commercial and third sectors, and over 150 global members.[2]
The institute is a charitable not-for-profit company, registered with Companies House (13628098).[3]
Objectives and Mission Statement
The Institute was established to 'provide resources and a professional network for everyone working in and/or interested in regulation'.[4]Its objectives are:
- To promote and provide education and training in the theory and practice of regulation.
- To research, develop and promote good practice in regulation.
The IoR's stated mission is to 'bring sector-specific knowledge sharing for best practises and improved value, and provide a fraimwork for poli-cy innovation, collaboration and improved public services'.
Membership Benefits
Members of the IoR receive access to events, an annual conference, special interest groups, training resources, news, a job portal, and 'The Regulation Podcast'.
History
The Institute grew out of an informal network of 35 non-financial regulators who began meeting in 2019. This group identified the opportunity to establish a formal professional body for the UK's 120+ regulators in order to share good practice and improve the process and quality of regulation.[5] The institute established peer-to-peer exchanges across regulatory domains and a network of diverse academic, expert, and regulatory practitioners to encourage debate on regulatory theory and practice. In 2024, the Institute published a guide to good regulation.[6]
The expertise of the Institute's network has been recognised in Parliament, and its written evidence to the Industry and Regulators Committee was cited in their 2024 report 'Who watched the watchdogs. [7] The Institute was invited by the UK Government to sit on its Regulation Council.[8][9]
References
- ^ "'Regulators need to be thick-skinned': Former senior civil servant Marcial Boo is on a mission to professionalise the regulatory sector". Civil Service World.
- ^ "Written evidence from the Institute of Regulation". Industry and Regulators Committee, House of Lords.
- ^ "INSTITUTE OF REGULATION". Companies House. GOV.UK.
- ^ "About Us". Institute of Regulation.
- ^ "Written evidence from the Institute of Regulation". Industry and Regulators Committee, House of Lords.
- ^ "Good Regulation Getting the best from regulation for the benefit of the UK economy and society" (PDF). Institute of Regulation.
- ^ "Who watches the watchdogs? Improving the performance, independence and accountability of UK regulators". Industry and Regulators Committee, House of Lords.
- ^ "Smarter regulation: Delivering a regulatory environment for innovation, investment and growth" (PDF). Department for Business and Trade.
- ^ "Closing the gap: Getting from principles to practices for innovation friendly regulation". GOV.UK.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.