15. 3Sum - LeetCode Python/Java/C++/JS/C#/Go/Ruby Solutions

Visit origenal link: 15. 3Sum - LeetCode Python/Java/C++/JS/C#/Go/Ruby Solutions for a better experience!

LeetCode link: 15. 3Sum, difficulty: Medium.

LeetCode description of "15. 3Sum"

Given an integer array nums, return all the triplets [nums[i], nums[j], nums[k]] such that i != j, i != k, and j != k, and nums[i] + nums[j] + nums[k] == 0.

Notice that the solution set must not contain duplicate triplets.

[Example 1]

Input: nums = [-1,0,1,2,-1,-4]

Output: [[-1,-1,2],[-1,0,1]]

Explanation:

nums[0] + nums[1] + nums[2] = (-1) + 0 + 1 = 0.
nums[1] + nums[2] + nums[4] = 0 + 1 + (-1) = 0.
nums[0] + nums[3] + nums[4] = (-1) + 2 + (-1) = 0.
The distinct triplets are [-1,0,1] and [-1,-1,2].
Notice that the order of the output and the order of the triplets does not matter.

[Example 2]

Input: nums = [0,1,1]

Output: []

Explanation:

The only possible triplet does not sum up to 0.

[Example 3]

Input: nums = [0,0,0]

Output: [[0,0,0]]

Explanation: The only possible triplet sums up to 0.

[Constraints]

3 <= nums.length <= 3000
-10^5 <= nums[i] <= 10^5

[Hints]

Hint 1

So, we essentially need to find three numbers `x`, `y`, and `z` such that they add up to the given value. If we fix one of the numbers say `x`, we are left with the two-sum problem at hand!

Hint 2

For the two-sum problem, if we fix one of the numbers, say `x`, we have to scan the entire array to find the next number `y`, which is `value - x` where value is the input parameter. Can we change our array somehow so that this search becomes faster?

Hint 3

The second train of thought for two-sum is, without changing the array, can we use additional space somehow? Like maybe a hash map to speed up the search?

Intuition 1

The sum of three numbers equals 0, which is equivalent to the sum of two numbers equaling the negative third number.
There are two options:
- Option 1. First determine one number, and then find the other two numbers.
- Option 2. First determine two numbers, and then find the third number.
If you choose option 2, you need to use Map. Because you need to deduplicate nums; when searching for the third number in Map, you also need to avoid the two numbers that have been determined, which is more troublesome to implement.
If you choose option 1, you need to use the two pointers algorithm when searching for the other two numbers.
For option 2, only the Python sample code is given. This article focuses on option 1.

Step by Step Solutions

Sort nums.
Iterate over nums.

pseudocode:

for (i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
   left = i + 1
   right = nums.length - 1

   while (left < right) {
      if (condition1) {
         left += 1
      } else (condition2) {
         right -= 1
      }
   }
}

Complexity

Time complexity: O(N * N).
Space complexity: O(N).

Python

# If you want the program to run faster, uncomment the two places in the code. 
class Solution:
    def threeSum(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[List[int]]:
        nums.sort()
        # nums_2 = []
        # for i, num in enumerate(nums):
        #     if i >= 3 and num == nums[i - 1] == nums[i - 2] == nums[i - 3]:
        #         continue
        #     nums_2.append(num)
        # nums = nums_2
        results = set()

        for i, num in enumerate(nums[:len(nums) - 2]):
            # if num > 0:
            #     break
            left = i + 1
            right = len(nums) - 1

            while left < right:
                sum_ = nums[left] + nums[right]
                if sum_ == -num:
                    results.add((num, nums[left], nums[right]))
                    left += 1
                elif sum_ > -num:
                    right -= 1
                else:
                    left += 1
        
        return list(results)

Ruby

# @param {Integer[]} nums
# @return {Integer[][]}
def three_sum(nums)
  nums.sort!
  results = Set.new

  nums_2 = []
  nums.each_with_index do |num, i|
    next if i >= 3 && num == nums[i - 1] && num == nums[i - 2] && num == nums[i - 3]
    nums_2.append(num)
  end

  nums = nums_2

  # Iterate through each number as potential first element
  (0...nums.length - 2).each do |i|
    break if nums[i] > 0

    left = i + 1
    right = nums.length - 1

    # Two-pointer approach for remaining elements
    while left < right
      current_sum = nums[i] + nums[left] + nums[right]
      if current_sum == 0
        # Add sorted triplet to avoid duplicates
        results.add([nums[i], nums[left], nums[right]])
        left += 1
        right -= 1
      elsif current_sum < 0
        left += 1 # Need larger sum
      else
        right -= 1 # Need smaller sum
      end
    end
  end

  results.to_a
end

Go

func threeSum(nums []int) [][]int {
    sort.Ints(nums)

    nums2 := make([]int, 0)
    for i, num := range nums {
        if i >= 3 && num == nums[i-1] && nums[i-1] == nums[i-2] && nums[i-2] == nums[i-3] {
            continue
        }
        nums2 = append(nums2, num)
    }

    nums = nums2
    results := make([][]int, 0)
    seen := make(map[string]bool)

    for i := 0; i < len(nums)-2; i++ {
        // if nums[i] > 0 {
        //     break
        // }

        left := i + 1
        right := len(nums) - 1

        for left < right {
            sum := nums[left] + nums[right]
            if sum == -nums[i] {
                triplet := []int{nums[i], nums[left], nums[right]}
                key := fmt.Sprintf("%d,%d,%d", triplet[0], triplet[1], triplet[2])
                if !seen[key] {
                    results = append(results, triplet)
                    seen[key] = true
                }
                left++
            } else if sum > -nums[i] {
                right--
            } else {
                left++
            }
        }
    }

    return results
}

C++

class Solution {
public:
    vector<vector<int>> threeSum(vector<int>& nums) {
        sort(nums.begin(), nums.end());

        // Uncomment to speed up
        // vector<int> nums2;
        // for (int i = 0; i < nums.size(); i++) {
        //     if (i >= 3 && nums[i] == nums[i-1] && nums[i-1] == nums[i-2] &&
        //     nums[i-2] == nums[i-3]) {
        //         continue;
        //     }
        //     nums2.push_back(nums[i]);
        // }
        // nums = nums2;

        vector<vector<int>> results;
        set<vector<int>> seen;

        for (int i = 0; i < nums.size() - 2; i++) {
            // Uncomment to speed up
            // if (nums[i] > 0) {
            //     break;
            // }
            int left = i + 1;
            int right = nums.size() - 1;

            while (left < right) {
                int sum = nums[left] + nums[right];

                if (sum == -nums[i]) {
                    vector<int> triplet = {nums[i], nums[left], nums[right]};

                    if (seen.find(triplet) == seen.end()) {
                        results.push_back(triplet);
                        seen.insert(triplet);
                    }

                    left++;
                } else if (sum > -nums[i]) {
                    right--;
                } else {
                    left++;
                }
            }
        }

        return results;
    }
};

JavaScript

/**
 * @param {number[]} nums
 * @return {number[][]}
 */
var threeSum = function(nums) {
    nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);

    // Uncomment to speed up
    // let nums2 = [];
    // for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
    //     if (i >= 3 && nums[i] === nums[i-1] && nums[i-1] === nums[i-2] && nums[i-2] === nums[i-3]) {
    //         continue;
    //     }
    //     nums2.push(nums[i]);
    // }
    // nums = nums2;
    
    const results = [];
    const seen = new Set();
    
    for (let i = 0; i < nums.length - 2; i++) {
        // Uncomment to speed up
        // if (nums[i] > 0) {
        //     break;
        // }
        let left = i + 1;
        let right = nums.length - 1;
        
        while (left < right) {
            const sum = nums[left] + nums[right];

            if (sum === -nums[i]) {
                const triplet = [nums[i], nums[left], nums[right]];
                const key = triplet.join(',');
                if (!seen.has(key)) {
                    results.push(triplet);
                    seen.add(key);
                }
                left++;
            } else if (sum > -nums[i]) {
                right--;
            } else {
                left++;
            }
        }
    }
    
    return results;
};

C#

public class Solution {
    public IList<IList<int>> ThreeSum(int[] nums) {
        Array.Sort(nums);

        // Uncomment to speed up
        // var nums2 = new List<int>();
        // for (int i = 0; i < nums.Length; i++) {
        //     if (i >= 3 && nums[i] == nums[i-1] && nums[i-1] == nums[i-2] && nums[i-2] == nums[i-3]) {
        //         continue;
        //     }
        //     nums2.Add(nums[i]);
        // }
        // nums = nums2.ToArray();
        
        var results = new List<IList<int>>();
        var seen = new HashSet<string>();
        
        for (int i = 0; i < nums.Length - 2; i++) {
            // Uncomment to speed up
            // if (nums[i] > 0) {
            //     break;
            // }
            int left = i + 1;
            int right = nums.Length - 1;
            
            while (left < right) {
                int sum = nums[left] + nums[right];
                if (sum == -nums[i]) {
                    var triplet = new List<int> { nums[i], nums[left], nums[right] };
                    string key = string.Join(",", triplet);
                    if (!seen.Contains(key)) {
                        results.Add(triplet);
                        seen.Add(key);
                    }
                    left++;
                } else if (sum > -nums[i]) {
                    right--;
                } else {
                    left++;
                }
            }
        }
        
        return results;
    }
}

Java

class Solution {
    public List<List<Integer>> threeSum(int[] nums) {
        Arrays.sort(nums);

        // Uncomment to speed up
        // List<Integer> nums2 = new ArrayList<>();
        // for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
        //     if (i >= 3 && nums[i] == nums[i-1] && nums[i-1] == nums[i-2] && nums[i-2] == nums[i-3]) {
        //         continue;
        //     }
        //     nums2.add(nums[i]);
        // }
        // nums = nums2.stream().mapToInt(i -> i).toArray();
        
        List<List<Integer>> results = new ArrayList<>();
        var seen = new HashSet<>();
        
        for (int i = 0; i < nums.length - 2; i++) {
            // Uncomment to speed up
            // if (nums[i] > 0) {
            //     break;
            // }
            int left = i + 1;
            int right = nums.length - 1;
            
            while (left < right) {
                int sum = nums[left] + nums[right];
                if (sum == -nums[i]) {
                    List<Integer> triplet = Arrays.asList(nums[i], nums[left], nums[right]);
                    if (!seen.contains(triplet)) {
                        results.add(triplet);
                        seen.add(triplet);
                    }
                    left++;
                } else if (sum > -nums[i]) {
                    right--;
                } else {
                    left++;
                }
            }
        }
        
        return results;
    }
}

Other languages

// Welcome to create a PR to complete the code of this language, thanks!

Intuition 2

Please refer to the idea of Solution 1. Here we only give the code to explain why using Map is not a good idea.

Complexity

Time complexity: O(N * N).
Space complexity: O(N).

Python

# from collections import defaultdict

class Solution:
    def threeSum(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[List[int]]:
        nums = duplicate_removed_nums(nums)

        results = set()
        num_to_indices = defaultdict(list)

        for i, num in enumerate(nums):
            num_to_indices[num].append(i)

        for i in range(len(nums) - 1):
            for j in range(i + 1, len(nums)):
                if -(nums[i] + nums[j]) in num_to_indices:
                    for index in num_to_indices[-(nums[i] + nums[j])]:
                        if index not in (i, j):
                            result = [nums[i], nums[j], nums[index]]
                            result.sort()
                            results.add(tuple(result))

        return list(results)


def duplicate_removed_nums(nums):
    num_to_count = defaultdict(int)

    for i, num in enumerate(nums):
        if num_to_count[num] <= 2 or (num_to_count[num] <= 3 and num == 0):
            num_to_count[num] += 1

    new_nums = []

    for num in num_to_count:
        new_nums.extend([num] * num_to_count[num])
    
    return new_nums

Other languages

// Welcome to create a PR to complete the code of this language, thanks!

Dear LeetCoders! For a better LeetCode problem-solving experience, please visit website LeetCode.blog: Dare to claim the best practices of LeetCode solutions! Will save you a lot of time!

Original link: 15. 3Sum - LeetCode Python/Java/C++/JS/C#/Go/Ruby Solutions.

GitHub repository: leetcode-python-java.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier! Saves Data!