Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correctly.

tglsfdc · tglsfdc · commit c1aea206e3e3 · 2024-05-07T18:22:52.000-04:00
If -l was specified together with selective-restore options such as -n or -N, dependent TOC entries such as comments would be omitted from the listing, even when an actual restore would have selected them. This happened because PrintTOCSummary neglected to update the te->reqs marking of the entry they depended on. Per report from Justin Pryzby. This has been wrong since 0d4e6ed taught _tocEntryRequired to sometimes look at the "reqs" marking of other TOC entries, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZjoeirG7yxODdC4P@pryzbyj2023
diff --git a/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c b/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c
@@ -1319,10 +1319,13 @@ PrintTOCSummary(Archive *AHX)
 	curSection = SECTION_PRE_DATA;
 	for (te = AH->toc->next; te != AH->toc; te = te->next)
 	{
+		/* This bit must match ProcessArchiveRestoreOptions' marking logic */
 		if (te->section != SECTION_NONE)
 			curSection = te->section;
+		te->reqs = _tocEntryRequired(te, curSection, AH);
+		/* Now, should we print it? */
 		if (ropt->verbose ||
-			(_tocEntryRequired(te, curSection, AH) & (REQ_SCHEMA | REQ_DATA)) != 0)
+			(te->reqs & (REQ_SCHEMA | REQ_DATA)) != 0)
 		{
 			char	   *sanitized_name;
 			char	   *sanitized_schema;
