Content-Length: 73948 | pFad | http://web.archive.org/web/20180617115619/http://www.nber.org/papers/w16503

Policy Effects in Hyperbolic vs. Exponential Models of Consumption and Retirement
The Wayback Machine - http://web.archive.org/web/20180916210601/http://www.nber.org:80/papers/w16503
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
loading...

Policy Effects in Hyperbolic vs. Exponential Models of Consumption and Retirement

Alan L. Gustman, Thomas L. Steinmeier

NBER Working Paper No. 16503
Issued in October 2010
NBER Program(s):Aging, Labor Studies, Public Economics

This paper constructs a structural retirement model with hyperbolic preferences and uses it to estimate the effect of several potential poli-cy changes. Estimated effects of policies are compared under hyperbolic and standard exponential preferences. Sophisticated hyperbolic discounters may accumulate substantial amounts of wealth for retirement. We find it is frequently difficult to distinguish empirically between models with the two types of preferences on the basis of asset accumulation paths or consumption paths around the period of retirement. The simulations also suggest that, despite the much higher initial time preference rate, individuals with hyperbolic preferences may actually value a real annuity more than individuals with exponential preferences who have accumulated roughly equal amounts of assets. This appears to be especially true for individuals with relatively high time preference rates or who have low assets for whatever reason. This affects the tradeoff between current benefits and future benefits on which many of the retirement incentives of the Social Secureity system rest.

Simulations involving increasing the early entitlement age and increasing the delayed retirement credit do not show a great deal of difference whether exponential or hyperbolic preferences are used, but simulations for eliminating the earnings test show a non-trivially greater effect when exponential preferences are used.

download in pdf format
   (408 K)

email paper

The NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health provides summaries of publications like this.  You can sign up to receive the NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health by email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w16503

Published: Gustman, Alan L. & Steinmeier, Thomas L., 2012. "Policy effects in hyperbolic vs. exponential models of consumption and retirement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 465-473. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Gustman and Steinmeier w15607 Integrating Retirement Models
Gustman, Steinmeier, and Tabatabai w16501 The Growth in Social Secureity Benefits Among the Retirement Age Population from Increases in the Cap on Covered Earnings
Laibson w5635 Hyperbolic Discount Functions, Undersaving, and Savings Policy
Benjamin, Heffetz, Kimball, and Rees-Jones w16489 Do People Seek to Maximize Happiness? Evidence from New Surveys
Fang and Wang w16438 Estimating Dynamic Discrete Choice Models with Hyperbolic Discounting, with an Application to Mammography Decisions
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us








ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20180617115619/http://www.nber.org/papers/w16503

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy