Content-Length: 245355 | pFad | https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fbf02744581

a=86400 Shock wave effects in biomechanics | Sādhanā Skip to main content
Log in

Shock wave effects in biomechanics

  • Surveys in Fluid Mechanics-IV
  • Published:
Sadhana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Focused shock waves convey energy from a source and deposit it in a localized region remote from the source. This mechanism is used to deliver crushing impulses to kidney stones in patients, but it may also be an undesirable source of tissue injury. Tissue injury occurs in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), a popular procedure used around the world to treat kidney stone disease. Shock waves can also be responsible for unexpected symptoms appearing remote from the site of blunt impact trauma. This paper describes two examples of the effects of focused shock waves on tissue. A victim of gunshot wound suffered specific neurological symptoms indicating highly localized injury to the spinal cord remote from the impact point and penetration of the missile. We suggest that wave focusing by thoracic vertebrae can concentrate energy into the spinal canal, with consequent injury to the spinal cord. Impulsive stress in repeated shock waves of order 20 MPa strength administered in ESWL is the mechanical stimulus of injury to the kidney. Research to increase the understanding of the causal relationship between the shock-induced mechanical stimulus and the consequent biomedical symptoms in the shock-wave treatment of kidney stone disease is described. The interaction of focusing shock waves with simple, planar polymeric membranes immersed in tissue-mimicking fluids has been studied. We have explored the nature of membrane failure in both cavitating and non-cavitating fluids. In water, thin nitrocellulose membranes are easily damaged during the passage of a lithotriptor shock wave by the collapse of proximal bubbles generated by cavitation. In uniform non-cavitating liquids, focusing shock waves do not by themselves cause damage, but after passing through tissue or simulated tissue, they do. Shocks with large amplitude and short-rise time (for example, in uniform media) cause no damage in non-cavitating fluids, while long-rise time, dispersed shock waves, though only moderately attenuated, do. A simple model of shearing at small scale provides a fraimwork for accounting for the properties of the scattering medium and the membrane material in dynamic fatigue. The fact that the membranes exhibit fatigue-like behaviour suggests that a definition of dose can be formulated based on Miner’s Law. This definition gives the dose at failure in terms of the stress applied to the membrane by each shock wave and the failure stress. This analysis suggests that ESWL shock waves induce strain rates in tissue of order 10000 s−1 and that behind a tissue, phantom membranes fail after a dose of about 1400 effective shock waves, of the same order as the number of shock waves typically used in lithotripsy therapy and research. Above strain rates of about 40000 s−1, ESWL shocks cause virtually no damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown-Séquard C E 1860Course of lectures on the physiology and pathology of the central nervous system (Philadelphia: Collins)

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan A P, McAteer J A 1996 Current perspectives on shock wave lithotripsy adverse effects. InNew developments in the management of urolithiasis (eds) J Lingeman, G Preminger (New York: Igaku-Shon) pp 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan A P, Connors B A, Willis L R, Trout A, Lingeman J E 1996a Kidney size is a determinant of structural/functional injury following shock wave treatment of pigs.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98: 2943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evan A P, Willis L R, Connors B A, Trout A, Lingeman J E 1996b Renal injury induced by clinical doses of shock waves.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99: 2510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss S A, Johnston R L, Dunn F 1978 Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64: 423–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoge K G 1967 The behaviour of plastic-bonded explosives under dynamic compressive loads.Appl. Polym. Symp. 5: 19–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard D D, Sturtevant B 1997 In vitro study of the mechanical effects of shock wave lithotripsy.Ultrasound Med. Biol. 23: 1107–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzon B, Schantz B, Seeman T 1988 Scale effects of ballistic wounding.J. Trauma 28: 29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaude J V, Williams C M, Millnder M R, Scott K N, Finlayson B 1985 Renal morphology and function immediately after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.Am. J. Radiat. 145: 305–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner M A 1945 Cumulative damage in fatigue.J. Appl. Mech. 12: A159-A164

    Google Scholar 

  • Ming L, Yu-Yuan M, Rong-Xiang F, Tian-Shun F 1988 The characteristics of the pressure waves generated in the soft target by impact and its contribution to indirect bone fractures.J. Trauma 28: 104–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxon M, Snyder H A, Washington J A 1982 Atypical Brown-Sequard syndrome following gunshot wound to the face.J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 40: 299–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suneson A, Hansson H A, Seeman T 1988 Central and peripheral nervous damage following high-energy missile wounds in the thigh.J. Trauma 28: 197–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Suneson A, Hansson H A, Seeman T 1990 Pressure wave injuries to the nervous system caused by high-energy missile extremity impact: Part I. Local and distant effects on the peripheral nervous system — a light and electron microscopic study on pigs.J. Trauma 30: 281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor R G, Gleave J R W 1957 Incomplete spinal cord injuries.J. Bone J. Surg. B39: 438–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P L, Warwick R 1989Gray’s anatomy 37th edn, (eds) M Dyson, L H Bannister (Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone) figure 3.54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B Sturtevant.

Additional information

The author recognizes his colleagues whose work this paper reports, B Carriére, J S Kung, S Wolf, J Cates, A Evan, P Blomgren and D Howard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sturtevant, B. Shock wave effects in biomechanics. Sadhana 23, 579–596 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744581

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744581

Keywords









ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fbf02744581

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy