Content-Length: 275877 | pFad | https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/634

BA Pre CR review request of CSS Multi-column layout Level 1 · Issue #634 · w3ctag/design-reviews · GitHub
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pre CR review request of CSS Multi-column layout Level 1 #634

Closed
1 task done
rachelandrew opened this issue May 13, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed
1 task done

Pre CR review request of CSS Multi-column layout Level 1 #634

rachelandrew opened this issue May 13, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Resolution: satisfied The TAG is satisfied with this design Review type: Already shipped Already shipped in at least one browser Topic: CSS Venue: CSS WG

Comments

@rachelandrew
Copy link

Ya ya yawm TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of the CSS Multi-column layout module. I would like to be able to take this spec back to CR, and have review requests in to all of the horizontal review groups.

CSS Multi-column Layout is a module of CSS that adds support for multi-column layouts. Support is included for establishing the number of columns in a layout, as well as how content should flow from column to column, gap sizes between columns, and column dividing lines (known as column rules) along with their appearance.

Further details:

  • I have reviewed the TAG's Web Platform Design Principles
  • Relevant time constraints or deadlines:
  • The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: CSSWG
  • The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done (if current group is a community group or other incubation venue): CSSWG
  • Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: none
  • This work is being funded by: no one

You should also know that...

CSS Multicol is a fairly old spec and was in CR when I started working on it, As there had been no updates for several years so the CSSWG resolved to take it back to WD status. It has almost complete implementation in browsers, and is also heavily used by print User Agents. Most of the reported interop issues with multicol at this point are actually fragmentation issues.

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):

🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback

@torgo
Copy link
Member

torgo commented May 25, 2021

Hi @rachelandrew we are just taking a look at this in our TAG breakout this morning. We're trying to figure out how we can best add value. It doesn't look like there's much for us to do. You mentioned interop issues - can you be more specific? Is there something you would specifically like the TAG's opinion on here? Otherwise we think this is proabbly good to go and we'll close this issue.

@torgo torgo added Review type: Already shipped Already shipped in at least one browser Progress: propose closing we think it should be closed but are waiting on some feedback or consensus labels May 25, 2021
@rachelandrew
Copy link
Author

Hi @torgo I don't think there is much for you here.

Interop/lack of support issues tend to relate to Fragmentation and the break-before, break-after and break-inside properties. For example, right now Can I Use flags partial implementation, due to fragmentation issues (I have raised an issue about that Fyrd/caniuse#5903).

@torgo torgo added Resolution: satisfied The TAG is satisfied with this design and removed Progress: propose closing we think it should be closed but are waiting on some feedback or consensus labels Jun 22, 2021
@torgo torgo removed this from the 2021-05-24-week milestone Jun 22, 2021
@LeaVerou
Copy link
Member

Hi @rachelandrew,

We looked at this again in a breakout today. Given that multicol is a mature specification that has been shipped in browsers for almost a decade, we don't think there is much to do here.
If the CSS WG would like more eyes on the CSS Fragmentation module, that should be a separate review.

Thank you for flying TAG!

@rachelandrew
Copy link
Author

thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Resolution: satisfied The TAG is satisfied with this design Review type: Already shipped Already shipped in at least one browser Topic: CSS Venue: CSS WG
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants








ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/634

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy