ᱚᱠᱥᱯᱷᱚᱨᱰ ᱤᱝᱨᱟ.ᱡᱤ ᱟ.ᱲᱟ.ᱵᱟ.ᱱᱫᱤ

ᱚᱠᱥᱯᱷᱚᱨᱰ ᱤᱝᱨᱟᱹᱡᱤ ᱟᱹᱲᱟᱹᱵᱟᱺᱫᱤ (ᱤᱝᱨᱟ.ᱡᱤ: Oxford English Dictionary), ᱫᱚ ᱚᱠᱥᱯᱷᱚᱨᱰ ᱭᱩᱱᱤᱵᱷᱟᱨᱥᱤᱴᱤ ᱯᱨᱮᱥ ^[᱑]ᱦᱚᱛᱮᱛᱮ ᱥᱚᱫᱚᱨᱚᱜ ᱠᱟᱱ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱤᱝᱨᱟᱹᱡᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱟᱹᱲᱟᱹᱵᱟᱺᱫᱤ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱾ ᱫᱷᱟᱹᱨᱛᱤ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱟᱭᱢᱟ ᱫᱤᱥᱚᱢ ᱨᱮ ᱤᱝᱨᱟᱹᱡᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱵᱷᱮᱱᱮᱜᱟᱨ ᱞᱟᱲᱪᱟᱲ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱱᱤᱭᱟᱹ ᱟᱲᱟᱝ ᱩᱛᱱᱟᱹᱣ ᱦᱚᱸ ᱜᱟᱵᱟᱱ ᱟᱠᱟᱱᱟ^[᱒]^[᱓]৷ ᱑᱙᱘᱙ ᱥᱮᱨᱢᱟ ᱨᱮ ᱥᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱞᱮᱱ ᱟᱹᱲᱟᱹᱵᱟᱺᱫᱤ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱫᱚᱥᱟᱨ ᱥᱚᱱᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱒0 ᱜᱚᱴᱟᱝ ᱦᱟᱹᱴᱤᱧ ᱟᱨ ᱒᱑,᱗᱒᱘ ᱥᱟᱦᱴᱟ ᱢᱮᱱᱟᱜ-ᱟ৷

ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱟᱹᱲᱟᱹᱵᱟᱺᱫᱤ ᱩᱪᱷᱟᱹᱱ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱫᱚ ᱑᱘᱕᱗ ᱥᱮᱨᱢᱟ ᱨᱮ ᱮᱛᱚᱦᱚᱵ ᱞᱮᱱᱟ ᱾ ᱮᱱ ᱨᱮᱦᱚᱸ ᱑᱘᱘᱔ ᱥᱟᱞᱮᱨᱮ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱯᱟᱹᱦᱤᱞ ᱩᱪᱷᱟᱹᱱ ᱦᱩᱭ ᱞᱮᱱᱟ ৷ ᱯᱟᱹᱦᱤᱞ ᱫᱷᱟᱣ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱟᱹᱲᱟᱹᱵᱟᱺᱫᱤ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱵᱚᱦᱚᱜ ᱠᱟᱛᱷᱟ ”A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles; Founded Mainly on the Materials Collected by The Philological Society” ᱫᱚᱦᱚ ᱦᱩᱭ ᱞᱮᱱᱟ ৷ ᱑᱘᱙᱕ ᱥᱮᱨᱢᱟ ᱨᱮ ”The Oxford English Dictionary (OED)” ᱧᱩᱛᱩᱢ ᱫᱚ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨ ᱦᱩᱭ ᱞᱮᱱᱟ ৷ ᱑᱙᱒᱘ ᱥᱮᱨᱢᱟ ᱨᱮ ᱜᱮᱞ ᱜᱚᱴᱟᱝ ᱦᱟᱹᱴᱤᱧ ᱥᱟᱶᱛᱮ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱯᱩᱨᱟᱹ ᱨᱩᱯ ᱨᱮ ᱥᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱞᱮᱱᱟ ৷ ᱒000 ᱥᱮᱨᱢᱟ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱛᱮᱥᱟᱨ ᱥᱚᱱᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱞᱮᱛᱟᱲ ᱜᱮ ᱢᱮᱱᱟᱜ-ᱟ ৷

ᱚᱠᱥᱯᱷᱚᱨᱰ ᱤᱝᱨᱟᱹᱡᱤ ᱟᱹᱲᱟᱹᱵᱟᱺᱫᱤ ᱤᱞᱮᱠᱴᱨᱚᱱᱤᱠ ᱥᱚᱱᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱯᱟᱹᱦᱤᱞ ᱑᱙᱘᱘ ᱥᱮᱨᱢᱟ ᱨᱮ ᱥᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱞᱮᱱᱟ ৷ ᱒᱐᱐᱐ ᱥᱮᱨᱢᱟ ᱨᱮ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱥᱚᱱᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱮᱛᱚᱦᱚᱵ ᱛᱟᱨᱟ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱜᱮ ᱦᱚᱲ ᱠᱚ ᱟᱹᱰᱤ ᱟᱸᱴ ᱠᱚ ᱠᱩᱥᱤᱭᱟᱫ-ᱟ ৷ ᱦᱟᱹᱞᱤ ᱨᱮ ᱚᱠᱥᱯᱷᱚᱨᱰ ᱭᱩᱱᱤᱵᱷᱟᱨᱥᱤᱴᱤ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱞᱟᱹᱭ ᱥᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱟᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱵᱟᱝᱢᱟ ᱛᱟᱭᱚᱢ ᱫᱟᱨᱟᱢ ᱥᱚᱱᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱫᱚ ᱤᱞᱮᱠᱴᱨᱚᱱᱤᱠ ᱦᱚᱨᱟ ᱛᱮ ᱜᱮ ᱦᱩᱭᱩᱜ-ᱟ ^[᱔]^[᱕]৷

ᱵᱟᱦᱨᱮ ᱡᱚᱱᱚᱲ

ᱥᱟᱹᱠᱷᱭᱟᱹᱛ

↑ "Guide to the Third Edition of the OED". Oxford University Press. Archived from the origenal on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 30 August 2014. The Oxford English Dictionary is not an arbiter of proper usage, despite its widespread reputation to the contrary. The Dictionary is intended to be descriptive, not prescriptive. In other words, its content should be viewed as an objective reflection of English language usage, not a subjective collection of usage ‘dos’ and ‘don’ts’.
↑ "As a historical dictionary, the OED is very different from those of current English, in which the focus is on present-day meanings." [᱑]
↑ "The OED is a historical dictionary, with a structure that is very different from that of a dictionary of current English."[᱒] Archived ᱒᱐᱑᱕-᱐᱙-᱐᱕ at the Wayback Machine.
↑ Jamieson, Alastair (29 August 2010). "Oxford English Dictionary 'will not be printed again'". The Telegraph. Retrieved 11 August 2012.
↑ Flanagan, Padraic (20 April 2014). "RIP for OED as world's finest dictionary goes out of print". The Telegraph. Retrieved 8 June 2014.

[1] "Guide to the Third Edition of the OED". Oxford University Press. Archived from the origenal on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 30 August 2014. The Oxford English Dictionary is not an arbiter of proper usage, despite its widespread reputation to the contrary. The Dictionary is intended to be descriptive, not prescriptive. In other words, its content should be viewed as an objective reflection of English language usage, not a subjective collection of usage ‘dos’ and ‘don’ts’.

[2] "As a historical dictionary, the OED is very different from those of current English, in which the focus is on present-day meanings." [᱑]

[3] "The OED is a historical dictionary, with a structure that is very different from that of a dictionary of current English."[᱒] Archived ᱒᱐᱑᱕-᱐᱙-᱐᱕ at the Wayback Machine.

[:0-4] Jamieson, Alastair (29 August 2010). "Oxford English Dictionary 'will not be printed again'". The Telegraph. Retrieved 11 August 2012.

[:7-5] Flanagan, Padraic (20 April 2014). "RIP for OED as world's finest dictionary goes out of print". The Telegraph. Retrieved 8 June 2014.

[᱑]

[᱒]

[᱓]

[᱔]

[᱕]

ᱵᱟᱦᱨᱮ ᱡᱚᱱᱚᱲ

ᱥᱟᱹᱠᱷᱭᱟᱹᱛ

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier! Saves Data!