Drag Coefficients
Summary
Drag coefficients (CD) in aerodynamics are drag forces normalized with a
reference area, usually the frontal area, another projection area or the wetted
area. Sometimes the reference area is not given, so the drag coefficient is a
misleading figure.
The actual values of the CD of particular devices are confidential by nature. The
drag force, instead, is more clearly identified.
All the data reported in the tables below must be read as averages. Each entry
has its own order of approximation. The tables have been elaborated from a number
of sources.
Description
Table 1 reports some typical values for widely studied bluff bodies.
Table 2 is a summary of typical drag coefficients of streamlined bodies.
Table 3 is a summary of drag data for airborne systems and road
vehicles.
Table 4 reports a summary of drag data for a human being performing
some well known physical activities.
Table 5 reports drag coefficients and total drag forces for some
automobiles.
Table 6 reports data for other systems, including towers and
tall buildings.
Table 1: Drag Coefficients for bluff bodies
Rough Shere (Re= ) | 0.40 |
Smooth Sphere (Re= [0] | 0.10 |
Hollow semi-sphere opposite stream | 1.42 |
Hollow semi-sphere facing stream | 0.38 |
Hollow semi-cylinder opposite stream | 1.20 |
Hollow semi-cylinder facing stream | 2.30 |
Squared flat plate at 90° | 1.17 |
Long flat plate at 90° | 1.98 |
Open Wheel, rotating, h/D=0.28 | 0.58 |
Table 2: drag coeffs for streamlined bodies
Laminar flat plate (Re= ) | 0.001 |
Turbulent flat plate (Re= ) | 0.005 |
Airfoil Section, minimum [1] | 0.006 |
Airfoil Section, at stall [1] | 0.025 |
2-Element Airfoil | 0.025 |
4-Element Airfoil | 0.05 |
Subsonic Aircraft Wing, minimum [2] | 0.05 |
Subsonic Aircraft Wing, at stall [2] | 0.16 |
Subsonic Aircraft Wing, minimum [3] | 0.005 |
Subsonic Aircraft Wing, at stall [3] | 0.09 |
Aircraft Wing (supersonic) | n.a. |
Table 3: drag coeffs for transport systems
Subsonic Transport Aircraft | 0.012 |
Supersonic Fighter, M=2.5 | 0.016 |
Airship | 0.020-0.025 |
Helicopter Download [4] | 0.4-1.2 |
Sports Car | 0.3 -0.4 |
Ecomony Car | 0.4 -0.5 |
Pickup Truck | 0.5 |
Tractor-Trailer, with fairings | 0.6-0.7 |
Tractor-Trailer | 0.7-0.9 |
Trailer alone | 0.9 |
Racing Car [5] | 0.65-1.10 |
Table 4: drag coeffs of Human
Man (upright position) | 1.0 - 1.3 |
Ski jumper | 1.2 - 1.3 |
Skier | 1.0 - 1.1 |
Parachutist | 1.0 - 1.4 |
Table 5: Drag coefficients for some passenger vehicles
Vehicle (class) | CD | CD × A (m²) |
VW Polo (class A) | 0.37 | 0.636 |
Ford Escort (class B) | 0.36 | 0.662 |
Open Vectra (class C) | 0.29 | 0.547 |
BMW 520i (class D) | 0.31 | 0.649 |
Mercedes 300SE (class E) | 0.36 | 0.785 |
Table 6: drag coeffs of other systems
Wires and cables | 1.0 - 1.3 |
Empire State Building | 1.3 - 1.5 |
Eiffel Tower | 1.8 - 2.0 |
Suspension Bridge | N.A. |
Notes
[0] See Speed Effects for details
[1] Approximate. Actual values strongly dependent on airfoil and Reynolds number.
[2] Rectangular wing of aspect-ratio 5.
[3] Wing NACA 64-210, aspect-ratio=9, taper=2.5, Re = 4.4 , M = 0.17.
[4] It is the drag coefficient for a helicopter in hover; depends on the type of fuselage
and the number and type of free standing sub-parts (stubs, nacelles, wings, fuel tanks,
weapons, etc.)
[5] Referred to the frontal area. If the reference area is the projected planform,
the CD is much lower.
Related Material
- Hoerner SF. Fluid Dynamic Drag, Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, 1965.
- Clift R, Grace JR, Weber ME. Bubbles, Drops, and Particles, Academic Press,
New York, 1978.
- Sovran G, Morel T, Mason WT (editors), Aerodynamic Drag Mechanisms of Bluff
Bodies and Road Vehicles, Plenum Press, New York, 1978 (ISBN 0-306-31119-4).
[Top of Page]
|
|