- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:27:01 -0800
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > So, based on feedback in this thread, here's my modified suggestion: > > 1. In step 3, add a step that, if the available cross size is > definite, and an item has both an intrinsic aspect ratio and > 'align-self:stretch', goes ahead and sets the hypothetical cross size > of the item to the available cross size, and the hypothetical main > size according to its aspect ratio. > 2. Modify step 9 (handling "stretch" alignment) to have an explicit > statement about handling aspect-ratio items, to clarify that it > changes the cross-size *while ignoring the aspect ratio*, so the main > size doesn't change. > > This should be all we need to do. If an item with an aspect ratio is > stretched and flexible, it'll first stretch its cross size to fit the > line, then flex its main size (possibly changing its cross size as > well to maintain its ratio), then stretch its cross size to fit the > line *again* if necessary, this time *not* changing the main size to > maintain its ratio. > > I've gotten private feedback from Ojan & Tony that they're fine with > these additions, and I think this matches IE's behavior. If I don't > get any objections from one of the other browsers, I'll put this into > the spec in a few days. We've made the change in (1) above, and just added a note rather than making the change in (2), as fantasai is sure that it won't actually have an effect if you follow the steps properly: <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#hypothetical-main-size> (third bullet point in the linked step). Can we get some review that this works, and that it matches the current IE behavior? ~TJ
Received on Monday, 3 December 2012 20:27:55 UTC