Commons:Deletion requests/File:Badjpeg.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This completely misses the point. File:Badjpeg.jpg is meant to illustrate the compression artifacts of JPEG. nyuszika7h (talk) 21:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- I don't have a problem with deleting the file, but I think is scientifically interesting to compare Quality and File-Size of different Types, therefore
- 83x27Pixels: 453 Bytes (JPG with lowest quality)
- 83x27Pixels: 211 Bytes (PNG with highest compression level)
- 83x27Pixels: 160 Bytes (SVG with most efficient code)
- Keep — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- That's true, I didn't think of that. It can be linked as another version, but {{Vector version available}} implies that one should be preferred, although it does say "when not inferior" so I don't know. Either way, I'm withdrawing the nomination. nyuszika7h (talk) 08:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
File:example.svg is a vector version of this file.
File:Deletion requests/File:Badjpeg.svg → File:example.svg
For more information, see Help:SVG. |
- {{Vector version available}} says (in the english version)
filename.svg is a vector version of this file. For more information, see Help:SVG.
- here is nothing about which one is preferred.
- On commons are different templates, some are just informing about other versions, other tells you to use an other version, and everything between is also available.
- Templates
- Beginning from the weak formulation to the strong formulation:
- Just informs about other version:{{Vector version available}}
- Says you should use the other one if it is better: {{Bitmap version available}}
- You should create it in vector format: {{Convert to SVG}}
- This picture was uploaded in a stupid format: {{BadJPEG}}
- This picture is superseded by another one: {{Superseded}}
- Usage and Reason
- As you can see i used the weakest formulation on File:Badjpeg.jpg, which only informs about an other file, but does not say anything about which one you should take.
- Which makes sense due to the fact that most want to show the artifacts, but in some cases they want to know, how the picture would that be as a vector-file.
- I used a slightly stronger version for File:Badjpeg.svg, which says that the better version should be taken,
- Which makes sense, due to the fact that you can compare the JPG with Vector (font looks different) or (intelligent) Raster graphics(has still pixels).
- I used the strongest version for File:Badjpeg.png, which says that the JPG schould be used with the reason:„JPEG has a bigger file size (more colours) and creates JPEG-Artifacts, which the PNG can't“
- Which makes sense, due to the fact that this picture as you wrote above should show the artefacts.
- conclusio
- I think we can add {{Vector version available}} to the File:Badjpeg.jpg again, due to the fact that it only informs about the other file.
- — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:34, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: Oh, I see, I don't know why I thought it said it's preferred. Never mind then, feel free to add it back. nyuszika7h (talk) 16:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:34, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)