Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Madrid cathedral 2020 - view from the dome.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 10:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Spain
Info all by me Fernando -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Support Panorama of the views from the dome of the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid. Pictures taken here at sunset are rare, since the regular visiting hours end before, and only limited, city hall-sponsored visits are allowed during the evening. -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)- Support There is a lot of colour noise but I think it's forgiveable because of very high resolution, perfect composition (beautifully centered), nice light, and as you say difficulty of taking the photo; any improvement you can make would be appreciated though Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Improved version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of removing the color noise, as well as significantly reducing the general noise without affecting the sharpness. If you/the community like the result, please feel free to use it for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- It looks fantastic, thank you! Uploaded and credited. Fernando (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much for the update! I am very happy that I was able to help solve technical quality issues :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking view and nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak support the perspective correction looks good in the middle, but it radically warped the shape and degraded the quality of the buildings in the background on the left and right. was the image scaled up with that version, too? If so, it would be better to do the noise correction before trying to scale it up (otherwise we wind up with some big noise). Still weakly supporting because the light and perspective is special. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)- Support Very special light, perspective, and atmosphere. Many thanks to Radomianin for the improvements, too. – Aristeas (talk) 18:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support That is amazing. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is a dust spot right of the right tower (see note) --Llez (talk) 11:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Please, reduce the noise, on both sides. It's a great picture but I don't understand why that cannot be improved, it is not FP-worthy IMHO. Will happily change to support when done Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)- Updated version available at SwissTransfer (2): Pinging @Fernando: The denoising should have been done before rescaling to avoid its potentiation on the sides. I re-edited it as best I could. If you are satisfied with the result, please feel free to use it for an update. Thanks to Poco and Rhododendrites for their helpful comments. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
