User talk:Magnus Manske

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

For bug reports or feature requests concerning my Labs tools, please use BitBucket.

It helps me keeping track of all the requests. Beats spreading them over half a dozen talk pages ;-)

Also : If the file upload bot transfered an unsuitable image from wikipedia or Flickr, don't ask me to fix it. I don't operate the bot; I only offer it, and someone else used it.


Archive
Archives
  1. – May 2007
  2. – September 2007
  3. – July 2008
  4. – January 2009
  5. – …
  6. – …
  7. – …
  8. – …
  9. – …
  10. – …
  11. – …
  12. – …
  13. – …
  14. – …
  15. – …

Lizenzprobleme in Massenuploads

[edit]

Mit etwa einem Viertel der Dateien ohne gültige Lizenz (und auch fehlender Freigabe) bringt das so nichts. Hast du eine Lösung, um den Anteil zu reduzieren und die bisher hochgeladenen Dateien auszusortieren? --Didym (talk) 22:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe die Filter geändert, so dass nur Personen mit Sterbedatum vor 1930 berücksichtigt werden; das sollte die nötigen Lizenzbausteine sicherstellen. --Magnus Manske (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, du hast viele Bilder mit Bilderrahmen hochgeladen, die sind schlichtweg Urheberrechtsverletzungen, egal wie als das Bild ist. Man kann die Gemälde rausschneiden um das zu heilen, aber dafür muss man halt Arbeit investieren vor dem Hochladen. Dito die nichtssagenden Filenamen, dito die (sorry) völlig bescheuerte Füllung der "Titel"-Felder. Von der fehlende Kategorisierung jeder Art ganz zu schweigen. Ich lade gerade wie oft hunderte, tausende Bilder aus Auktionshäusern hoch, und das ist eben richtig viel Arbeit, wochenlange Arbeit. Und überall begegnen mir Deine völlig indadäquaten Uploads von letzter Woche... Letzte Beispiele Category:Wilhelm Schodde. Und auch die Texte, die du einfach übernommen hast, sind nicht nur rein informativ (und selbst da wäre an den Datenbankschutz zu denken, das mache ich aber auch nicht, sondern "klaue" die Informationen der Auktiosnshäuser und verbessere sie, wo wie oft nötig), sondern oft durchaus mit Schöpfungshöhe beschreibend und besonders bewertend. Beispiel: File:Albert Tibulle Furcy de Lavault - (1) (10).jpg Da steht im Feld Beschreibung ein halber Aufsatz. So geht das nicht! --Anvilaquarius (talk) 19:00, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eine Lösung für die bisher hochgeladenen Urheberrechtsverletzungen fehlt weiterhin, dafür kommen weiterhin neue Dateien. Sollte das so weitergehen, bleibt nur noch eine Sperre übrig. --Didym (talk) 14:06, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Minnie Cormack - Minnie Cormack.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Minnie Cormack - Minnie Cormack.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 14:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aleksander Świdwiński - Świdwiński Aleksander - IN THE CAFETERIA, 1923 - 47.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gower (talk) 14:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]