Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social Perceptions of Rainforest and Climatic Change from Rural Communities in Southern Mexico

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding social perceptions of rural communities is essential to construct public policy and management alternatives, not only to maintain natural ecosystems but also to deal with a changing environment due to climatic change. Because climate variability in Mexico has important socio-economic and environmental impacts, it is necessary to build capacities for adaptation. We describe social perceptions of three main local stakeholders (that is, farmers, elders, and local authorities), regarding their relationships with rainforest and local adaptation to climate change in eleven rural communities in Marqués de Comillas municipality, Chiapas, Southern Mexico. We based in a qualitative approach and used participant observation and semi-structured interviews. Even certain subtly variation among stakeholders, we recognized some underlying ideas behind perceptions. Rainforest is considered crucial to maintain human livelihoods and to mitigate climatic changes. They perceived changes in climate occurring in the region, such as raising temperature, unpredictable rainfall, and streams becoming dry. Local organization and government involved in managing rainforest or dealing with climatic changes are practically absent. This emphasizes the needs bring proper and reliable information to make decisions regarding rainforest use and management, but also to adapt to a changing climate. The loss of the collective character of the communities and, certain conflicts in public policies that mirrored in the coexistence of initiatives with contrasting objectives are proposed as particularly important for understanding the emergence of these perceptions. We proposed some recommendations to bolster regional capacities addressing climate change. Involving stakeholders such as governmental and non-governmental institutions is also imperative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arizpe L, Paz F, Velázquez M. 1993. Cultura y cambio global: percepciones sociales sobre la deforestación en la selva Lacandona. México, DF: Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias UNAM, Grupo Editorial Miguel Ángel Porrúa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechin SR, Wilshusen PR, Fortwrangler CL, West PC. 2002. Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as a social and political process. Society and Natural Resources 15:41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo A, Magaña A, Pujadas A, Martínez L, Godínez C. 2005. Understanding the interaction of rural people with ecosystems: a case study in a tropical dry forest of Mexico. Ecosystems 8:630–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CATHALAC-PNUD-GEF. 2008. Fomento de las Capacidades para la Etapa II de Adaptación al Cambio Climático en Centroamérica, México y Cuba. Panamá: Centro del Agua para el Trópico Húmedo en América Latina y el Caribe, Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, Fondo Mundial para el Medio Ambiente.

  • Ceiba. 2009. Análisis, sistematización y difusión de lecciones aprendidas de la implementación de políticas públicas y programas de conservación y manejo sustentable de recursos naturales en Marqués de Comillas, Chiapas, Selva Lacandona. México DF: Centro Interdisciplinario de Biodiversidad y Ambiente A.C., USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challenger A, Dirzo R and others. 2009. Factores de cambio y estado de la biodiversidad. CONABIO (ed). Capital Natural de México, Vol. II, Estado de conservación y tendencias de cambio. Conabio, pp 37–73.

  • Clardy A. 2013. Strength vs. strong position: rethinking the nature of SWOT analysis. Modern Manag Sci Eng 1:100–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONABIO. 2006. Capital natural y bienestar social. México DF: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong BHJ, Ochoa-Gaona S, Castillo-Santiago MA, Ramírez-Marcial N, Cairns MA. 2000. Carbon flux and patterns of land-use/land-cover change in the Selva Lacandona, Mexico. Ambio 29:504–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vos J. 1996. Oro verde. La conquista de la Selva Lacandona por los madereros tabasqueños, 1822–1949. Fondo de Cultura Económica-Gobierno del Estado de Tabasco. México.

  • De Vos J. 2002. Una tierra para sembrar sueños. Historia reciente de la Selva Lacandona 1950–2000. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México DF

  • DeWalt KM, DeWalt BR. 2010. Participant observation. A guide for fieldworkers. 2nd edn. Maryland: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirzo R. 1991. La Vegetación, exuberancia milenaria. Agrupación Sierra Madre, editor. Lacandonia, el último refugio. Agrupación Sierra Madre-UNAM, México DF. pp 52–74.

  • Durand L, Vázquez LB. 2011. Biodiversity conservation discourses. A case study on scientists and government authorities in Sierra de Huautla Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Land Use Policy 28:76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endter-Wada J, Blahna D, Krannich R, Brunson M. 1998. A framework to understandin social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecol Appl 8:891–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana A, Frey JH. 2000. The interview: from structured questions to negotiated text. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, Eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. p 645–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gachanja MK. 2003. Public perception of forest as a motor for change: the case of Kenya. Unasylva 55:59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaister KW, Falshaw JR. 1999. Strategic planning still going strong. Long Range Plan 32:107–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Ponciano J. 1996. Marqués de Comillas: cultura y sociedad en la selva fronteriza México-Guatemala. En: J.P. Viqueira y M.H. Ruz (coord.), Chiapas los rumbos de otra historia, UNAM-CIESAS, Mexico, pp. 425–444

  • Harvey N. 2002. La remunicipalización en Marqués de Comillas y Benemérito de Las Américas, Chiapas: entre la vía institucional y la vida cotidiana. San Cristóbal de las Casas: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social. 32 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms MM, Nixon J. 2010. Exploring SWOT analysis—where are we now? J Strategy Manag 3:215–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffenberg PH. 2001. Landscape, memory and the Australian war experience, 1915–18. J Contemp Hist 36:111–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS. 1998. Two cultures of ecology. Conserv Ecol 2(2):4. http://www.consecol.org/Journal/

  • Hunziker M, Felber P, Gehring K, Buchecker M, Bauer N, Klenast F. 2008. Evaluation of landscape change by different social groups. Results of two empirical studies in Switzerland. Mt Res Dev 28:140–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INE-UNAM. 2006. Fomento de las Capacidades para la Etapa II de Adaptación al Cambio Climático en Centroamérica, México y Cuba. México DF: Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el desarrollo PNUD-GEF.

  • INEGI. 2010. Conteo nacional de población. México DF: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen DL. 1989. Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc. pp 75–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa R, Neri C. 2007. El diagnóstico socio-ambiental como herramienta para orientar política pública en la gestión de riesgos hidro-meteorológicos en la región semiárida del Alto Mezquital en Hidalgo y el Centro-Oeste de Querétaro. INE, UAQ, FIRCO, CONABIO, Querétaro, México: Congreso Nacional y Reunión Mesoamericana de Manejo de Cuencas Hidrográficas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa R, Magaña V, Neri C. 2008. Agua y clima: elementos para la adaptación al cambio climático. Mexico DF: SEMARNAT, CCA-UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa R, Siller D, Magaña V. 2011. Bases para la gobernanza hídrica en condiciones de cambio climático, en ciudades del sureste de México. México DF: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para los Asentamientos Humanos, Programa Conjunto de Agua y Saneamiento del Sistema de Naciones Unidas en México.

  • Lazos E, Paré L. 2000. Miradas indígenas sobre una naturaleza ‘‘entristecida’’: percepciones del deterioro ambiental entre nahuas del sur de Veracruz. México DF: UNAM, Plaza Valdés Editores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck MS, Bryman A, Liao TF. 2004. The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. SAGE Publication, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781412950589.

  • López-Medellín X, Ezcurra E, González-Abraham C, Hak J, Santiago LS, Sickman J. 2011a. Oceanographic anomalies and sea-level rise drive mangroves inland in the Pacific coast of Mexico. J Veget Sci 22:143–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Medellín X, Castillo A, Ezcurra E. 2011b. Contrasting perspectives on mangroves in arid Northwestern Mexico: implications for integrated coastal management. Ocean Coast Manag 54:318–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Ramos M, Barraza L, Balvanera P et al. 2012. Manejo de bosques tropicales: bases científicas para la conservación, restauración y aprovechamiento de ecosistemas en paisajes rurales. Invest Ambient 4:111–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza E, Dirzo R. 1999. Deforestation in Lacandonia (southeast Mexico): evidence for the declaration of the northernmost tropical hot-spot. Biodiv Conserv 8:1621–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and well-being. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygren A. 2004. Contested lands and incompatible images: the political ecology of struggle over resources in Nicaragua’s Indio-Maíz Reserve. Soc Nat Resour 17:189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill RV. 2001. Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? (with full military honors of course). Ecology 83:3275–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semarnat. 2009. Libro blanco de la selva. México DF: Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schama S. 1995. Landscape and memory. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SJ, Bogdan R. 1996. Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. Barcelona: Paidós. pp 101–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM. 1997. Sustainable development at the village community level: a third world perspective. In: Smith E, Ed. Environmental sustainability: practical global applications. Boca Raton: Lucie Press. p 233–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNAM-INE. 2006. Estrategia de Restauración Ambiental y Prevención de Incendios en Ejidos Ribereños del Río Lacantún, colindantes a la Reserva de la Biosfera Montes Azules. México: UNAM, Instituto Nacional de Ecología.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNAM-INE. 2008. Análisis comparativo de la deforestación de los ejidos de Marqués de Comillas, y determinación de corredores biológicos que conecten los fragmentos de selva de los ejidos con la Reserva de la Biosfera Montes Azules. México DF: UNAM, Instituto Nacional de Ecología.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNAM-INE. 2009. Análisis socio-ambiental del deterioro y la percepción de las poblaciones locales de la vulnerabilidad y el riesgo frente al cambio climático, en Marqués de Comillas, Chiapas. México DF: UNAM, Instituto Nacional de Ecología.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNAM-INE. 2013. Evaluación de los impactos de proyectos de desarrollo sustentable sobre la reducción del cambio de uso de suelo en ejidos de Marqués de Comillas, Chiapas. México DF: UNAM, Instituto Nacional de Ecología.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vela-Peón F. 2001. Un acto metodológico básico de la investigación social: la entrevista cualitativa. In: Tarrés ML, Ed. Observar, escuchar y comprender: sobre la tradición cualitativa en la investigación social. Porrúa, México DF: El Colegio de México. p 63–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weihrich H. 1982. The SWOT matrix: a tool for situational analysis. Long range planning 15:54–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte AVT. 1985. Perception. In: Kates RW, Ausubel JH, Berbertian , Eds. Climate Impact Assessment. , Toronto: SCOPE, Wiley. p 403–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilshusen PR, Murguía RE. 2003. Scaling up from the grassroots. NGO networks and the challenges of organizational maintenance in Mexico’s Yucatán Península. In: Brechin SR, Wilshusen PR, Fortwrangler CL, West PC, Eds. Contested nature promoting international biodiversity with social justice in the twenty-first century. New York: State University of New York Press. p 195–216.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Hernández, J. González-Zurita, K. Soto, and A. Gutiérrez for field assistance. PM thanks funding by Pemex and the WWS-FCS Alliance to Natura y Ecosistemas Mexicanos AC. JC thanks project INE/A1-042/08, by Facultad de Ciencias—UNAM and the Instituto Nacional de Ecología.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Meli.

Additional information

Author contributions

PM and JC proposed this research. RL and PM designed methods for data collection and analysis, collected and analyzed data. PM wrote the first draft of the manuscript. XLM, RL, and JC advised data analysis and discussion of ideas. All authors have substantially contributed to ideas and revision of previous versions of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meli, P., Landa, R., López-Medellín, X. et al. Social Perceptions of Rainforest and Climatic Change from Rural Communities in Southern Mexico. Ecosystems 18, 1343–1355 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9903-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9903-8

Keywords

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy