Skip to main content

Systems Support for Ubiquitous Computing: A Case Study of Two Implementations of Labscape

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pervasive Computing (Pervasive 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2414))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1160 Accesses

Abstract

Labscape, a ubiquitous computing environment for cell biologists, was implemented twice: once using only standard tools for distributed systems (TCP sockets and shared file systems) and once using one.world, a runtime system designed specifically to support ubiquitous applications. We analyze Labscape in terms of the system properties that are required to provide a fluid user experience. Though the two implementations are functionally and architecturally similar, we found a significant difference in the degree to which they each exhibited the required properties. The fact that one.world was not designed specifically with Labscape in mind yet was found to support the application’s requirements well suggests that ubiquitous applications have many aspects in common, and can benefit from a system support layer for coping with dynamic environments. We present, in detail, the concepts embodied in one.world that we have found to be most important for Labscape, and how some of these concepts might be extended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grimm, R., Davis, J., Lemar, E., Macbeth, A., Swanson, S., Gribble, S., Anderson, T., Bershad, B., Borriello, G., Wetherall, D., Programming for Pervasive Computing Environments, University of Washington Technical Report UW-CSE-01-06-01, June, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Consolvo, S., Arnstein, L., Franza, B.R., User Study Techniques in the Design and Evaluation of a Ubicomp Environment. Intel Research Seattle Technical Report IRS-TR-02-012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnstein, L. F., and Borriello, G., Labscape: The Design of a Smart Environment, Intel Research Seattle Technical Report IRS-TR-02-008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Want, R., Hopper, A., Falcao, V., Gibbons, J., The Active Badge Location System, Technical Report 92.1, 1992, ORL, 24a Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2, 1QA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hill, J., Szewczyk, R., Woo, A., Hollar, W., Culler, D., Pister, K., “System architecture directions for network sensors”, ASPLOS 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stevens, R. W., UNIX Network Programming, Prentice Hall, vol. 1, 2nd edition, 1998, ISBN0-13-490012-X

    Google Scholar 

  7. Birrell, A. D., Nelson, B. J., “Implementing Remote Procedure Calls”, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49–59, Feb, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Srinivasan, R., Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2, Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC No. 1831, Aug 1995, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1831.txt?number=1831

  9. Winer, D., XML-RPC Specification, http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec, UserLand, Burlingame California, October 1999.

  10. Box, D., Ehnebuske, D., Kakivaya, G., Layman, A., Mendelsohn, N., Frystyk, N., Thatte, S., Winer, D., Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1, World Wide Web Consortium Note, Cambridge Massachusetts, May, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Siegel, J., CORBA Fundamentals and Programming, John Wiley & Sons, April, 1996, ISBN 0-471-12158-7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Birrell, A., Nelson, G., Owicki, S., Wobber, E., Network Objects, Technical Report, Digital Equipment Systems Research Center, #115, Palo Alto, California, Feb, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sun Microsystems Corporation, Java Remote Method Invocation Specification, Rev 1.7, Palo Alto, California, December 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arnold, K., O’Sullivan, B., Scheifler, R.W., Waldo, J., Wollrath, A., The Jini Specification, Addison Wesley, 1999, ISBN 0-201-61634-3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nieh, J., Yang, S.J., Novik, N., A Comparison of Thin-Client Computing Architectures, Network Computing Laboratory, Columbia University, Technical Report CUCS-022-00, November 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arnstein, L. et al. (2002). Systems Support for Ubiquitous Computing: A Case Study of Two Implementations of Labscape. In: Mattern, F., Naghshineh, M. (eds) Pervasive Computing. Pervasive 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2414. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45866-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45866-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44060-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45866-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy