Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Restoration of Finger and Arm Movements Using Hybrid Brain/Neural Assistive Technology in Everyday Life Environments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Brain-Computer Interface Research

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering ((BRIEFSELECTRIC))

Abstract

Controlling advanced robotic systems with brain signals promises substantial improvements in health care, for example, to restore intuitive control of hand movements after severe stroke or spinal cord injuries (SCI). However, such integrated, brain- or neural-controlled robotic systems have yet to enter broader clinical use or daily life environments. The main challenge to integrate such systems in everyday life environments relates to the reliability of brain-control, particularly when brain signals are recorded non-invasively. Using a non-invasive, hybrid EEG-EOG-based brain/neural hand exoskeleton (B/NHE), we demonstrate full restoration of activities of daily living (ADL), such as eating and drinking, across six paraplegic individuals (five males, 30 ± 14 years) outside the laboratory. In a second set of experiments, we show that even whole-arm exoskeleton control is feasible and safe by combining hybrid brain/neural control with vision-guided and context-sensitive autonomous robotics. Given that recent studies indicate neurological recovery after chronic stroke or SCI when brain-controlled assistive technology is repeatedly used for 1–12 months, we suggest that combining an assistive and rehabilitative approach may further promote brain-machine interface (BMI) technology as a standard therapy option after stroke and SCI. In such scenario, brain/neural-assistive technology would not only have an immediate impact on the quality of life and autonomy of individuals with brain or spinal cord lesions but would also foster neurological recovery by stimulating functional and structural neuroplasticity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 12.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zs5k7MpS1g0.

References

  1. N. Birbaumer, L.G. Cohen, Brain-computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. J. Physiol. 579, 621–636 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G.L. Birbeck, M.G. Hanna, R.C. Griggs, Global opportunities and challenges for clinical neuroscience. JAMA 311, 1609–1610 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Broetz, C. Braun, C. Weber, S.R. Soekadar, A. Caria, N. Birbaumer, Combination of brain-computer interface training and goal-directed physical therapy in chronic stroke: a case report. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 24, 674–679 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Buch, C. Weber, L.G. Cohen, C. Braun, M.A. Dimyan, T. Ard, J. Mellinger, A. Caria, S.R. Soekadar, A. Fourkas, N. Birbaumer, Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke 39, 910–917 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Caria, C. Weber, D. Brötz, A. Ramos, L.F. Ticini, A. Gharabaghi, C. Braun, N. Birbaumer, Chronic stroke recovery after combined BCI training and physiotherapy: a case report. J. Psychophysiol. 48, 578–582 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M.A. Cervera, S.R. Soekadar, J. Ushiba, J.D.R. Millán, M. Liu, N. Birbaumer, G. Garipelli, Brain-computer interfaces for post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a meta-analysis. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 5, 651–663 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Clausen, E. Fetz, J. Donoghue, J. Ushiba, U. Spörhase, J. Chandler, N. Birbaumer, S.R. Soekadar, Help, hope and hype: ethical dimensions of neuroprosthetics. Science 356, 1338–1339 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Crea, M. Nann, E. Trigili, F. Cordella, A. Baldoni, F.J. Badesa, J.M. Catalan, L. Zollo, N. Vitiello, N.G. Aracil, S.R. Soekadar, Feasibility and safety of shared EEG/EOG and vision-guided autonomous whole-arm exoskeleton control to perform activities of daily living. Sci. Rep. 8, 10823 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.L. Collinger, B. Wodlinger, J.E. Downey, W. Wang, E.C. Tyler-Kabara, D.J. Weber, A.J. McMorland, M. Velliste, M.L. Boninger, A.B. Schwartz, High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. Lancet 381, 557–564 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B.H. Dobkin, Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation. J. Physiol. 579, 637–642 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A.R. Donati, S. Shokur, E. Morya, D.S. Campos, R.C. Moioli, C.M. Gitti, P.B. Augusto, S. Tripodi, C.G. Pires, G.A. Pereira, F.L. Brasil, S. Gallo, A.A. Lin, A.K. Takigami, M.A. Aratanha, S. Joshi, H. Bleuler, G. Cheng, A. Rudolph, M.A. Nicolelis, Long-term training with a brain-machine interface-based gait protocol induces partial neurological recovery in paraplegic patients. Sci. Rep. 6, 30383 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. V.L. Feigin, M.H. Forouzanfar, R. Krishnamurthi, G.A. Mensah, M. Connor, D.A. Bennett et al., Global and regional burden of stroke in 1990–2010: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 382, 1–12 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. L.R. Hochberg, D. Bacher, B. Jarosiewicz, N.Y. Masse, J.D. Simeral, J. Vogel, S. Haddadin, J. Liu, S.S. Cash, P. van der Smagt, J.P. Donoghue, Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature 485(7398), 372–375 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M.E. Johanson, J.P. Jaramillo, C.A. Dairaghi, W.M. Murray, V.R. Hentz, Multicenter survey of the effects of rehabilitation practices on pinch force strength after tendon transfer to restore pinch in tetraplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 97(6 Suppl), S105–S116 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Ramos-Murguialday, D. Broetz, M. Rea, L. Läer, O. Yilmaz, F.L. Brasil, G. Liberati, M.R. Curado, E. Garcia Cossio, A. Vyziotis, W. Cho, M. Agostini, E. Soares, S.R. Soekadar, A. Caria, L.G. Cohen, N. Birbaumer, Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study. Ann. Neurol. 74, 100–108 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Ruddy, J. Balsters, D. Mantini, Q. Liu, P. Kassraian-Fard, N. Enz, E. Mihelj, B. Subhash Chander, S.R. Soekadar, N. Wenderoth, Neural activity related to volitional regulation of cortical excitability. Elife 7, e40843 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. S.R. Soekadar, M. Witkowski, J. Mellinger, A. Ramos Murguialday, N. Birbaumer, L.G. Cohen, ERD-based online brain-machine interfaces (BMI) in the context of neurorehabilitation: optimizing BMI learning and performance. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 19, 542–549 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S.R. Soekadar, N. Birbaumer, M.W. Slutzky, L.G. Cohen, Brain-machine interfaces in neurorehabilitation of stroke. Neurobiol. Dis. 83, 172–179 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S.R. Soekadar, M. Witkowski, N. Vitiello, N. Birbaumer, An EEG/EOG-based hybrid brain- neural computer interaction (BNCI) system to control an exoskeleton for the paralyzed hand. Biomed. Tech. 60, 199–205 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S.R. Soekadar, L.G. Cohen, N. Birbaumer, Clinical brain-machine interfaces, in Plasticity of cognition in neurologic disorders, ed. by J. Tracy, B. Hampstead, K. Sathian (Oxford University Press, New York, 2015), pp. 347–362

    Google Scholar 

  21. S.R. Soekadar, M. Witkowski, C. Gómez, E. Opisso, J. Medina, M. Cortese, M. Cempini, M.C. Carozza, L.G. Cohen, N. Birbaumer, N. Vitiello, Hybrid EEG/EOG-based brain/neural hand exoskeleton restores fully independent daily living activities after quadriplegia. Sci. Robot. 1, eaag3296 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Toyama, K. Takano, K. Kansaku, A nonadhesive solid-gel electrode for a non-invasive brain–machine interface. Front. Neurol. 3, 114 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Wang, Y. Li, J. Long, T. Yu, Z. Gu, An asynchronous wheelchair control by hybrid EEG–EOG brain–computer interface. Cognit. Neurodyn. 8, 399–409 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. WHO: World health report, Geneva, World Health Organization (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Witkowski, M. Cortese, M. Cempini, J. Mellinger, N. Vitiello, S.R. Soekadar, Enhancing brain-machine interface (BMI) control of a hand exoskeleton using electrooculography (EOG). J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 11, 165 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S.L. Wolf, C.J. Winstein, J.P. Miller et al., The EXCITE investigators. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3–9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296, 2095–2104 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter and the presented studies were supported by the European Commission under the project AIDE (G.A. no: 645322), the European Research Council (ERC) under the project NGBMI (759370), and the Baden-Württemberg Stiftung (NEU007/1). SRS received special support by the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation as 2017 NARSAD Young Investigator Grant recipient and P&S Fund Investigator.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Neurotechnology Lab, Neuroscience Research Center (NWFZ), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Surjo R. Soekadar & Marius Nann

  2. Applied Neurotechnology Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    Surjo R. Soekadar & Marius Nann

  3. The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy

    Simona Crea, Emilio Trigili & Nicola Vitiello

  4. Hospital de Neurorehabilitació Institut Guttmann, Barcelona, Spain

    Cristina Gómez & Eloy Opisso

  5. Human Cortical Physiology and Stroke Neurorehabilitation Section, National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA

    Leonardo G. Cohen

  6. Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    Niels Birbaumer

  7. Wyss Center for Bio and Neuroengineering, Geneva, Switzerland

    Niels Birbaumer

Authors
  1. Surjo R. Soekadar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marius Nann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Simona Crea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emilio Trigili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cristina Gómez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eloy Opisso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Leonardo G. Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Niels Birbaumer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Nicola Vitiello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Surjo R. Soekadar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. g.tec Medical Engineering GmbH, Schiedlberg, Austria

    Christoph Guger

  2. Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting

  3. Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA

    Brendan Z. Allison

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Soekadar, S.R. et al. (2019). Restoration of Finger and Arm Movements Using Hybrid Brain/Neural Assistive Technology in Everyday Life Environments. In: Guger, C., Mrachacz-Kersting, N., Allison, B. (eds) Brain-Computer Interface Research. SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05668-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05668-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05667-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05668-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy