Skip to main content

Exploring the Value of Electronic Health Records from Multiple Datasets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2018)

Abstract

During the last decades, most European countries dedicated huge efforts in collecting and maintaining Electronic Health Records (EHR). With the continuous grow of these datasets, it became obvious that its secondary use for research may lead to new insights about diseases and treatments outcomes.

EHR databases can be used to speed up and reduce the cost of health research studies, which are essential for the advance and improvement of health services. However, many times, a single observational data source is not enough for a clinical study, thus data interoperability has a major impact on the exploration of value of EHRs. Despite the recognized benefit of data sharing, database owners remain reluctant in conceding access to the contents of their databases, mainly due to ownership, privacy and security issues.

In this paper, we exploit two major international initiatives, the European Medical Information Framework (EMIF) and the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI), to provide a methodology through which multiple longitudinal clinical repositories can be queried, without the data leaving its original repository.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.eugdpr.org/.

  2. 2.

    www.emif-catalogue.eu.

  3. 3.

    www.ohdsi.org.

  4. 4.

    https://github.com/OHDSI/CommonDataModel/wiki.

  5. 5.

    http://www.emif.eu.

  6. 6.

    http://www.ohdsi.org/web/atlas.

  7. 7.

    https://emif-catalogue.eu/taska/.

  8. 8.

    https://github.com/OHDSI/ArachneUI.

References

  1. Cheng, H.G., Phillips, M.R.: Secondary analysis of existing data: opportunities and implementation. Shanghai Arch. Psychiatry 26(6), 371 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cushman, R., Froomkin, A.M., Cava, A., Abril, P., Goodman, K.W.: Ethical, legal and social issues for personal health records and applications. J. Biomed. Inform. 43(5), S51–S55 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel, C., et al.: Cross border semantic interoperability for clinical research: the EHR4CR semantic resources and services. AMIA Summits Transl. Sci. Proc. 2016, 51 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Doods, J., Botteri, F., Dugas, M., Fritz, F.: A European inventory of common electronic health record data elements for clinical trial feasibility. Trials 15(1), 18 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Doolan, D.M., Winters, J., Nouredini, S.: Answering research questions using an existing data set. Med. Res. Arch. 5(9), 1–14 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fajarda, O., Silva, L.B., Rijnbeek, P., Van Speybroeck, M., Oliveira, J.L.: A methodology to perform semi-automatic distributed EHR database queries. In: 11th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2018), vol. 5, pp. 127–134 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gini, R., et al.: Data extraction and management in networks of observational health care databases for scientific research: a comparison of EU-ADR, OMOP, Mini-Sentinel and MATRICE strategies. Egems 4(1), 1189 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hripcsak, G., et al.: Observational health data sciences and informatics (OHDSI): opportunities for observational researchers. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 216, 574 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huser, V., Kahn, M.G., Brown, J.S., Gouripeddi, R.: Methods for examining data quality in healthcare integrated data repositories. In: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB), pp. 628–633 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Köpcke, F., Prokosch, H.U.: Employing computers for the recruitment into clinical trials: a comprehensive systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 16(7), e161 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lopes, P., Silva, L.B., Oliveira, J.L.: Challenges and opportunities for exploring patient-level data. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mann, C.: Observational research methods II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Research design. Emerg. Med. J. 20(1), 54–60 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McMurry, A.J., et al.: SHRINE: enabling nationally scalable multi-site disease studies. PLoS One 8(3), e55811 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meystre, S., Lovis, C., Bürkle, T., Tognola, G., Budrionis, A., Lehmann, C., et al.: Clinical data reuse or secondary use: current status and potential future progress. IMIA Yearb. 26, 38–52 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, A.R., Tucker, C.: Health information exchange, system size and information silos. J. Health Econ. 33, 28–42 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Murphy, S.N., et al.: Serving the enterprise and beyond with informatics for integrating biology and the bedside (i2b2). J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 17(2), 124–130 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nass, S.J., Levit, L.A., Gostin, L.O., et al.: The value, importance, and oversight of health research. In: Beyond the HIPAA Privacy Rule: Enhancing Privacy Improving Health Through Research (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ohmann, C., Kuchinke, W.: Meeting the challenges of patient recruitment. Int. J. Pharm. Med. 21(4), 263–270 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pakhomov, S., Weston, S.A., Jacobsen, S.J., Chute, C.G., Meverden, R., Roger, V.L., et al.: Electronic medical records for clinical research: application to the identification of heart failure. Am. J. Manag. Care 13(6 Part 1), 281–288 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Piwowar, H.A., Chapman, W.W.: Public sharing of research datasets: a pilot study of associations. J. Informetr. 4(2), 148–156 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Platt, R., Carnahan, R.: The us food and drug administration’s mini-sentinel program. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 21(S1), 1–303 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pringle, S., Lippitt, A.: Interoperability of electronic health records and personal health records: key interoperability issues associated with information exchange. J. Healthc. Inf. Manag.: JHIM 23(3), 31–37 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reisman, M.: EHRs: the challenge of making electronic data usable and interoperable. Pharm. Ther. 42(9), 572 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schneeweiss, S., Avorn, J.: A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 58(4), 323–337 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Si, Y., Weng, C.: An OMOP CDM-based relational database of clinical research eligibility criteria. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 245, 950 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Silva, L.B., Trifan, A., Oliveira, J.L.: MONTRA: an agile architecture for data publishing and discovery. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 160, 33–42 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Trifan, A., Díaz, C., Oliveira, J., et al.: A methodology for fine-grained access control in exposing biomedical data. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 247, 561–565 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Trifirò, G., et al.: Combining multiple healthcare databases for postmarketing drug and vaccine safety surveillance: why and how? J. Intern. Med. 275(6), 551–561 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Weber, G.M., et al.: The shared health research information network (SHRINE): a prototype federated query tool for clinical data repositories. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 16(5), 624–630 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has received support from the EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking (EMIF grant n. 115372), and from the Integrated Programme of SR&TD ‘SOCA’ (CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000010), co-funded by Centro 2020 program, Portugal 2020, European Union, through the European Regional Development Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Luís Oliveira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fajarda, O., Trifan, A., Van Speybroeck, M., Rijnbeek, P.R., Oliveira, J.L. (2019). Exploring the Value of Electronic Health Records from Multiple Datasets. In: Cliquet Jr., A., et al. Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. BIOSTEC 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1024. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29196-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29196-9_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29195-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29196-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy