Abstract
EEG synchronization is an essential tool to understand mechanisms of communication between brain regions. Despite numerous successes along this direction, grand challenges still remain: (1) to establish the relation between treatment outcome and the synchronization patterns amongst brain regions and (2) to correctly quantify the synchronization amongst brain regions with different electrode placement topologies. As for this problem, we propose an approach to inter-region synchronization analysis based on Heterogeneous Matrix Similarity Measurement to avoid information loss of the results on similarity. It is measured by deriving the bridge matrix that quantifies the distance from the source matrix to the target one both of arbitrary dimensions. The similarity measures are then used to examine the relation between brain region interactions (directional) and treatment outcome. Experiments have been performed on EEG collected from patients received anti-depression treatment with both non-effective and effective outcomes. Experimental results indicate that for the non-effective group, \(97\%\) (\(95\%\)) similarity values from right temporal to central (from left temporal to central) are greater than the average similarity value of all patients; The new correlation measures can quantify the directional synchronization between brain regions and form an indicator for anti-depression treatment outcome with a high-level confidence. The approach also holds potentials in sophisticated applications involving clustering and dimensionality reduction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Abdallah, C.G., et al.: Ketamine treatment and global brain connectivity in major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 42, 1210–1219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2016.186
Baird, L., Moore, A.: Gradient descent for general reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems II, pp. 968–974. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999). https://doi.org/10.1145/1514274.1514279
Bassett, D.S., Sporns, O.: Network neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 353–364 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4502
Bonita, J.D., et al.: Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures. Cogn. Neurodyn. 8, 1–15 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-013-9267-8
Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, London (2004)
Chen, D., Li, X., Cui, D., Wang, L., Lu, D.: Global synchronization measurement of multivariate neural signals with massively parallel nonlinear interdependence analysis. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22(1), 33–43 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2258939
Dosovitskiy, A., Brox, T.: Generating images with perceptual similarity metrics based on deep networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 (NIPS), pp. 658–666. Curran Associates Inc., Barcelona (2016). http://papers.nips.cc/paper/6158-generating-images-with-perceptual-similarity-metrics-based-on-deep-networks.pdf
Drysdale, A.T., et al.: Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression. Nat. Med. 23, 28–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4246
Ghuman, A.S., McDaniel, J.R., Martin, A.: A wavelet-based method for measuring the oscillatory dynamics of resting-state functional connectivity in MEG. NeuroImage 56(1), 69–77 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.046
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 2015), vol. 1502, pp. 1026–1034, February 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2015.123
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition, vol. abs/1512.03385, Las Vegas, NV, USA, June 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90
Ioffe, S., Szegedy, C.: Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In: Bach, F., Blei, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, PMLR, Lille, France, 07–09 July 2015, vol. 37, pp. 448–456 (2015). http://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/ioffe15.html
Kandel, E.R., Markram, H., Matthews, P.M., Yuste, R., Koch, C.: Neuroscience thinks big (and collaboratively). Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 659–664 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3578
Ke, H., Chen, D., Li, X., Tang, Y., Shah, T., Ranjan, R.: Towards brain big data classification: Epileptic EEG identification with a lightweight VGGNet on global MIC. IEEE Access 6, 14722–14733 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2810882
Kim, D.J., et al.: Disturbed resting state EEG synchronization in bipolar disorder: a graph-theoretic analysis. NeuroImage: Clin. 2(Suppl. C), 414–423 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2013.03.007
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun. ACM 60(2), 2012 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386
Leuchter, A.F., Cook, I.A., Hunter, A.M., Cai, C., Horvath, S.: Resting-state quantitative electroencephalography reveals increased neurophysiologic connectivity in depression. PLOS One 7(2), 1–13 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032508
Li, X., Ouyang, G.: Estimating coupling direction between neuronal populations with permutation conditional mutual information. NeuroImage 52(2), 497–507 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.003
Mumtaz, W., Ali, S.S.A., Yasin, M.A.M., Malik, A.S.: A machine learning framework involving EEG-based functional connectivity to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 56(2), 233–246 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1685-z
Reshef, D.N., et al.: Detecting novel associations in large datasets. Science 334(6062), 1518–1524 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1205438
Rubinov, M., Sporns, O.: Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. NeuroImage 52(3), 1059–1069 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003
Sabour, S., Frosst, N., Hinton, G.E.: Dynamic routing between capsules. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS), pp. 3859–3869 (2017). http://papers.nips.cc/paper/6975-dynamic-routing-between-capsules.pdf
Smilde, A., Bro, R., Geladi, P.: Multi-way Analysis. Wiley, West Sussex (2004)
Stam, C.: Functional connectivity patterns of human magnetoencephalographic recordings: a ‘small-world’ network? Neurosci. Lett. 355(1), 25–28 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2003.10.063
Acknowledgement
This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61772380), Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of Hubei Province (No.2017CFA007), and Major Project for Technological Innovation of Hubei Province (No. 2019AAA044).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ke, H., Chen, D., Zhang, L., Zhang, X., Liu, X., Li, X. (2019). Inter-region Synchronization Analysis Based on Heterogeneous Matrix Similarity Measurement. In: Tetko, I., Kůrková, V., Karpov, P., Theis, F. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2019: Workshop and Special Sessions. ICANN 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11731. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30493-5_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30493-5_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30492-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30493-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)