Skip to main content

Teachers’ Perspectives on the Adoption of an Adaptive Learning System Based on Multimodal Affect Recognition for Students with Learning Disabilities and Autism

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Adaptive Instructional Systems. Design and Evaluation (HCII 2021)

Abstract

Adoption of e-learning for those with special needs lags that for mainstream learners. Not much is known about barriers and facilitators that drive this disparity. The present study used focus groups and interviews to collect the views of 21 teachers taking part in preliminary evaluations of an adaptive learning system based on multimodal affect recognition for students with learning disabilities and autism. The system uses multimodal detection of affective state and scoring of performance to drive its adaptive selection of learning material. Five themes captured the teachers’ views of the system’s potential impact, especially regarding learning and engagement but also on factors that might influence adoption. These were: the potential of the system to transform their teaching practice; the ability of the system to impact on learning outcomes; the potential impact on teacher-student/peer to peer relationships; usability issues; and organisational challenges. Despite being highly motivated as volunteer testers, teachers highlighted barriers to adoption, which will need addressing. This finding underscores the importance of involving teachers and students in the design and development process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 03 July 2021

    A correction has been published.

References

  1. World Economic Forum, 29 April 2020. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/. Accessed 08 Jan 2021

  2. Cinquin, P.-A., Guitton, P., Sauzéon, H.: Online e-learning and cognitive disabilities: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 130(March), 152–167 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rose, R.M., Blomeyer, R.L.: Access and equity in online classes and virtual schools, North American Council for Online Learning (2007). https://www.inacol.org/resource/access-and-equity-in-online-classes-and-virtual-schools. Accessed 08 Jan 2021

  4. Bertini, E., Kimani, S.: Mobile devices: opportunities for users with special needs. In: Chittaro, L. (ed.) Mobile HCI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2795, pp. 486–491. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45233-1_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, G.Z., Wu, N.W., Chen, Y.W.: Identifying emerging trends for implementing learning technology in special education: a state-of-the-art review of selected articles published in 2008–2012. Res. Dev. Disabil. 34, 3618–3628 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox, M., Preston, C., Cox, K.: What Factors Support or Prevent Teachers from Using ICT in their Classrooms? Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Sussex at Brighton (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J.M., Steeples, C., Tickner, S.: Competences for online teaching: a special report. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 49, 65–72 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Narayanan, S.A., Kaimal, M.R., Bijlani, K., Prasanth, M., Kumar, K.S.: Computer vision based attentiveness detection methods in e-learning. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Interdisciplinary Advances in Applied Computing—ICONIAAC 2014. ACM Press, New York, pp 1–5 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yadegaridehkordi, E., Noor, N.F.B.M., Ayub, N.M.B.A., Affal, H.B., Hussin, N.B.: Affective computing in education: a systematic review and future research. Comput. Educ. 142, (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson, N., McGill, T.J.: Genetics with Jean: the design, development and evaluation of an affective tutoring system. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 65, 279–299 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aslan, S., et al.: Investigating the impact of a real-time, multimodal student engagement analytics technology in authentic classrooms. In: Presentation at Computer Human Interaction (CHI) 2019 (paper 304), Glasgow, Scotland (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scheiter, K., et al.: Adaptive multimedia: using gaze-contingent instructional guidance to provide personalized processing support. Comput. Educ. 139, 31–47 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu, C.-H., Huang, Y.-M., Hwang, J.-P.: Review of affective computing in education/learning: trends and challenges. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 47(6), 1304–1323 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Standen, P.J., et al.: An evaluation of an adaptive learning system based on multimodal affect recognition for learners with intellectual disabilities. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 51(5), 1748–1765 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bauer, M.S., Damschroder, L., Hagedorn, H., Smith, J., Kilbourne, A.M.: An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol. 3(1), 32 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell, M., et al.: Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 321, 694–696 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Newell, A.F., Gregor, P., Morgan, M., Pullin, G., Macaulay, C.: User-sensitive inclusive design. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10, 235–243 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Poulson, D.F., Waddell, F.N.: USERfit: user centred design in assistive technology. In: Nicolle, C.A., Abascal. J. (eds.) Inclusive Design Guidelines for HCl, pp 143–150. London: CRC Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Basak, S.K.: A comparison of barriers and enhance factors on the adoption and use of ICT into teaching and learning for teachers. In: International Conference on Information Society (i-Society 2014), pp. 244–247, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rikala, J., Hiltunen, L., Vesisenaho, M.: Teachers’ attitudes, competencies, and readiness to adopt mobile learning approaches. In: IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, pp. 1 – 8, Madrid (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abed, M.G.: Teachers’ perspectives surrounding ICT use amongst SEN students in the mainstream educational setting. World J. Educ. 8(1), 6–16 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Campigotto, R., McEwen, R., Demmans Epp, C.: Especially social: exploring the use of an iOS application in special needs classrooms. Comput. Educ. 60(1), 74–86 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Minocha, S.: A study of the effective use of social software to support student learning and engagement. The Open University, Milton Keynes (2009). UK. http://oro.open.ac.uk/16141/3/Effective-use-of-Social-Software-in-Education-CaseStudies.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2021

  24. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen, G.M., Yoder, K.J., Ganzel, B.L., Goodwin, M.S., Belmonte, M.K.: Harnessing repetitive behaviours to engage attention and learning in a novel therapy for autism: an exploratory analysis. Front. Educ. Psychol. 3, 12 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Doherty-Sneddon, G., Riby, D.M., Whittle, L.: Gaze aversion as a cognitive load management strategy in autism spectrum disorder and Williams syndrome. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 53(4), 420–430 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Legoff, D.B., Sherman, M.: Long-term outcome of social skills intervention based on interactive LEGO play. Autism 10(4), 317–329 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Locke, J., et al.: Individual and organizational factors that affect implementation of evidence-based practices for children with autism in public schools: a cross-sectional observational study. Implementation Sci. 14, 29 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the European Research Council Horizon 2020#687772 “Managing Affective-learning THrough Intelligent atoms and Smart InteractionS”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Shopland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Standen, P.J. et al. (2021). Teachers’ Perspectives on the Adoption of an Adaptive Learning System Based on Multimodal Affect Recognition for Students with Learning Disabilities and Autism. In: Sottilare, R.A., Schwarz, J. (eds) Adaptive Instructional Systems. Design and Evaluation. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12792. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77857-6_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77857-6_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77856-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77857-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy