Abstract
Mobile app development and usage is booming in India; however, it is still in the early stages of adoption especially among the rural farming community. This research attempted to identify the usability problems of a selected agricultural mobile app, NaPanta, developed for Indian farmers. A twofold method was used to understand the usability and functionality of the app. Phase-1: the app was reviewed by experts (n = 18) using cognitive walkthrough and heuristic evaluation for usability and performance analyses. Phase-2: field studies with real users (n = 53) were conducted to compare and validate findings from the low-cost usability studies of phase-1. This paper discusses methods and findings of phase-1.
A mixed-methods approach was used to perform qualitative and quantitative data analysis. Thematic analysis and descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated. A total of 90 usability problems within 25 themes and two overarching categories were found. Lack of search functionality and lack of consistency topped the list.
This study also contributes to usability research by providing interesting insights on the number of experts required to identify most of the usability problems in comparison to the magic number 5. Results indicate our study required more than 5 participants to find 80% of the problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
NaPanta-Agriculture Crop Management App for Farmer - Apps on Google Play, https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.napanta.farmer.app. Accessed 17 Mar 2021
Patel, H., Patel, D.: Survey of android apps for the agriculture sector. Int. J. Inf. Sci. Tech. 6(1–2), 61–67 (2016)
Rana, S., Sontakki, B.S.: Mobile based agro advisory services (MAAS) in India: an assessment of their effectiveness. Hyderabad, India, 2017 (Report No. 234) (2017). Retrieved from ICAR- National Academy of Agricultural Research Management website. http://eprints.naarm.org.in/234/
Blackmon, M., Polson, P., Kitajima, M., Lewis, C.: Cognitive walkthrough for the Web. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 463–470 (2002)
Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 249–256. ACM (1990)
Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press Inc., Cambridge (1994)
Gerhardt-Powals, J.: Cognitive engineering principles for enhancing human-computer performance. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 8(2), 189–211 (1996)
Weinschenk, S., Barker, D.T.: Designing Effective Speech Interfaces, vol. 1. Wiley, New York (2000)
Inostroza, R., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Rusu, V., Collazos, C.A.: Developing SMASH: a set of smartphone’ usability heuristics. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 43, 40–52 (2016)
Turner, C.W., Lewis, J.R., Nielsen, J.: Determining usability test sample size. Int. Encycl. Ergon. Hum. Factors 3(2), 3084–3088 (2006)
Lindgaard, G., Chattratichart, J.: Usability testing: what have we overlooked? In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1415–1424 (2007)
Alroobaea, R., Mayhew, P.J.: How many participants are really enough for usability studies? In: 2014 Science and Information Conference, pp. 48–56. IEEE (2014)
Demir, F., Parraci, W.: The more complex the less success in online library services: evaluating the user experience for international students. Issues Trends Educ. Technol. 6(2) (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Narisetti, S.R.K., Twidale, M. (2021). App Analysis with a Larger Than Usual Number of Usability Experts. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2021 - Posters. HCII 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1419. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78635-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78635-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78634-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78635-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)