Skip to main content

Differences in Social Media Usage Exist Between Western and Middle-East Countries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Passive and Active Measurement (PAM 2022)

Abstract

In this paper, we empirically analyze two examples of a Western (DE) versus Middle-East (SA) Online Social Messaging App. By focusing on the system interactions over time in comparison, we identify inherent differences in user engagement. We take a deep dive and shed light onto differences in user attention shifts and showcase their structural implications to the user experience. Our main findings show that in comparison to the German counterparts, the Saudi communities prefer creating content in longer conversations, while voting more conservative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernstein, M.S., Monroy-Hernández, A., Harry, D., André, P., Panovich, K., Vargas, G.G.: 4chan and/b: an analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. In: ICWSM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Birnholtz, J., Merola, N.A.R., Paul, A.: Is it weird to still be a virgin: anonymous, locally targeted questions on Facebook confession boards. In: SIGCHI (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Black, E.W., Mezzina, K., Thompson, L.A.: Anonymous social media-understanding the content and context of Yik Yak. SIGCHI (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bollen, J., Mao, H., Pepe, A.: Modeling public mood and emotion: twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena. In: ICWSM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brodersen, A., Scellato, S., Wattenhofer, M.: Youtube around the world: geographic popularity of videos. In: WWW, pp. 241–250 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cha, M., Mislove, A., Gummadi, K.P.: A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network. In: WWW (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Correa, D., Silva, L.A., Mondal, M., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.P.: The many shades of anonymity: characterizing anonymous social media content. In: ICWSM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman, L.: The Development of Social Network Analysis. Empirical Press, Vancouver (2004). ISBN 1-59457-714-5

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goodrich, K., de Mooij, M.: How ‘social’ are social media? A cross-cultural comparison of online and offline purchase decision influences. J. Mark. Commun. 20(1–2), 103–116 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2013.797773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hosseinmardi, H., Ghasemianlangroodi, A., Han, R., Lv, Q., Mishra, S.: Towards understanding cyberbullying behavior in a semi-anonymous social network. In: ASONAM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kairam, S., Brzozowski, M., Huffaker, D., Chi, E.: Talking in circles: selective sharing in google+. In: SIGCHI (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kayes, I., Kourtellis, N., Quercia, D., Iamnitchi, A., Bonchi, F.: The social world of content abusers in community question answering. In: WWW (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., Moore, J.D.: Twitter sentiment analysis: the good the bad and the omg! In: ICWSM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar, R., Novak, J., Tomkins, A.: Structure and evolution of online social networks. In: Yu, P., Han, J., Faloutsos, C. (eds.) Link Mining: Models, Algorithms, and Applications. Springer, New York, NY (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6515-8_13

  15. LaRose, R., Connolly, R., Lee, H., Li, K., Hales, K.D.: Connection overload? A cross cultural study of the consequences of social media connection. Inf. Syst. Manag. 31(1), 59–73 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.854097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leavitt, A.: This is a throwaway account: temporary technical identities and perceptions of anonymity in a massive online community. In: CSCW (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leskovec, J., Horvitz, E.: Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In: WWW (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., Christakis, N.: Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Soc. Netw. 30(4), 330–342 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Magno, G., Comarela, G., Saez-Trumper, D., Cha, M., Almeida, V.: New kid on the block: exploring the google+ social graph. In: IMC (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Manku, G.S., Naor, M., Wieder, U.: Know thy neighbor’s neighbor: the power of lookahead in randomized p2p networks. In: STOC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. McKenzie, G., Adams, B., Janowicz, K.: Of oxen and birds: is yik yak a useful new data source in the geosocial zoo or just another twitter? In: SIGSPATIAL (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mislove, A., Koppula, H.S., Gummadi, K.P., Druschel, P., Bhattacharjee, B.: Growth of the flickr social network. In: WOSN (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mislove, A., et al.: Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In: IMC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nazir, A., Raza, S., Chuah, C.N.: Unveiling facebook: a measurement study of social network based applications. In: IMC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Papasavva, A., Zannettou, S., De Cristofaro, E., Stringhini, G., Blackburn, J.: Raiders of the lost kek: 3.5 years of augmented 4chan posts from the politically incorrect board. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 14, pp. 885–894 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reelfs, J.H., Bergmann, M., Hohlfeld, O., Henckell, N.: Understanding & predicting user lifetime with machine learning in an anonymous location-based social network. In: WWW LocWeb Workshop (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442442.3451887

  27. Reyaee, S., Ahmed, A.: Growth pattern of social media usage in Arab Gulf states: an analytical study. Soc. Networking 4(02), 23 (2015). Scientific research publishing

    Google Scholar 

  28. Saveski, M., Chou, S., Roy, D.: Tracking the yak: an empirical study of yik yak. In: ICWSM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schiöberg, D., Schneider, F., Schiöberg, H., Schmid, S., Uhlig, S., Feldmann, A.: Tracing the birth of an osn: social graph and profile analysis in google+. In: WebSci (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stutzman, F.D., Gross, R., Acquisti, A.: Silent listeners: the evolution of privacy and disclosure on Facebook. J. Priv. Confidentiality 4(2), 2 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tang, J., Sun, J., Wang, C., Yang, Z.: Social influence analysis in large-scale networks. In: SIGKDD (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Van Mieghem, P., Blenn, N., Doerr, C.: Lognormal distribution in the digg online social network. Eur. Phys. J. B 83(2), 251 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vaterlaus, J.M., Barnett, K., Roche, C., Young, J.A.: “Snapchat is more personal": an exploratory study on Snapchat behaviors and young adult interpersonal relationships. Comput. Hum. Behav. 62, 594–601 (2016). Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, G., Wang, B., Wang, T., Nika, A., Zheng, H., Zhao, B.Y.: Whispers in the dark: analysis of an anonymous social network. In: IMC (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, S., Lo, D., Jiang, L.: An empirical study on developer interactions in stackoverflow. In: SAC (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Whittaker, E., Kowalski, R.M.: Cyberbullying via social media. J. Sch. Violence 14(1), 11–29 (2015). Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Helge Reelfs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Reelfs, J.H., Hohlfeld, O., Henckell, N. (2022). Differences in Social Media Usage Exist Between Western and Middle-East Countries. In: Hohlfeld, O., Moura, G., Pelsser, C. (eds) Passive and Active Measurement. PAM 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13210. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98785-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98785-5_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98784-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98785-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy