Skip to main content

The Impact of Recommender System and Users’ Behaviour on Choices’ Distribution and Quality

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Bias and Fairness in Information Retrieval (BIAS 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1610))

  • 686 Accesses

Abstract

Recommender Systems (RSs) research has become interested in assessing the system effect on the actual choices of their users: the distribution and the quality of the choices. By simulating users’ choices, influenced by RSs, it was shown that algorithmic biases, such as the tendency to recommend popular items, are transferred to the users’ choices.

In this paper we conjecture that the effect of an RS on the quality and distribution of the users’ choices can also be influenced by the users’ tendency to prefer certain types of items, i.e., popular, recent, or highly rated items. To quantify this impact, we define alternative Choice Models (CMs) and we simulate their effect when users are exposed to recommendations. We find that RS biases can also be enforced by the CM, e.g., the tendency to concentrate the choices on a restricted number of items. Moreover, we discover that the quality of the choices can be jeopardised by a CM. We also find that for some RSs the impact of the CM is less prominent and their biases are not modified by the CM. This study show the importance of assessing algorithmic biases in conjunction with a proper model of users’ behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdollahpouri, H., et al.: Beyond personalization: Research directions in multistakeholder recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.01986 (2019)

  2. Bartels, J., Reinders, M.J.: Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: a propositional inventory for future research. J. Bus. Res. 64(6), 601–609 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bountouridis, D., Harambam, J., Makhortykh, M., Marrero, M., Tintarev, N., Hauff, C.: Siren: a simulation framework for understanding the effects of recommender systems in online news environments. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 150–159. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaney, A.J., Stewart, B.M., Engelhardt, B.E.: How algorithmic confounding in recommendation systems increases homogeneity and decreases utility. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 224–232 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ciampaglia, G.L., Nematzadeh, A., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: How algorithmic popularity bias hinders or promotes quality. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 1–7 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fleder, D., Hosanagar, K.: Blockbuster culture’s next rise or fall: the impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Manage. Sci. 55(5), 697–712 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Funk, S.: Netflix update: try this at home (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gravino, P., Monechi, B., Loreto, V.: Towards novelty-driven recommender systems. Comptes Rendus Physique 20(4), 371–379 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gunawardana, A., Shani, G.: A survey of accuracy evaluation metrics of recommendation tasks. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10(Dec), 2935–2962 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hazrati, N., Ricci, F.: Recommender systems effect on the evolution of users’ choices distribution. Inf. Process. Manage. 59(1), 102766 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. He, R., McAuley, J.: Ups and downs: modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with one-class collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference On World Wide Web, pp. 507–517 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. He, X., Liao, L., Zhang, H., Nie, L., Hu, X., Chua, T.S.: Neural collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 173–182 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hu, Y., Koren, Y., Volinsky, C.: Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In: 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 263–272. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kowald, D., Schedl, M., Lex, E.: The unfairness of popularity bias in music recommendation: a reproducibility study. In: Jose, J.M., et al. (eds.) ECIR 2020. LNCS, vol. 12036, pp. 35–42. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Levin, J., Milgrom, P.: Introduction to choice theory (2004). http://web.stanford.edu/$~$jdlevin/Econd/20202

  16. Schnabel, T., Swaminathan, A., Singh, A., Chandak, N., Joachims, T.: Recommendations as treatments: debiasing learning and evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.05352 (2016)

  17. Szlávik, Z., Kowalczyk, W., Schut, M.: Diversity measurement of recommender systems under different user choice models. In: Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vargas, S.: Novelty and diversity evaluation and enhancement in recommender systems. Ph.D. thesis, Ph.D. Dissertation. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, J., Adomavicius, G., Gupta, A., Ketter, W.: Consumption and performance: understanding longitudinal dynamics of recommender systems via an agent-based simulation framework. Inf. Syst. Res. 31(1), 76–101 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Caverlee, J.: Measuring and mitigating item under-recommendation bias in personalized ranking systems. In: Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 449–458 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naieme Hazrati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hazrati, N., Ricci, F. (2022). The Impact of Recommender System and Users’ Behaviour on Choices’ Distribution and Quality. In: Boratto, L., Faralli, S., Marras, M., Stilo, G. (eds) Advances in Bias and Fairness in Information Retrieval. BIAS 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1610. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09316-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09316-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09315-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09316-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy