Skip to main content

Cyberarchaeology: Improved Way Findings for Archaeological Parks Through Mobile Augmented Reality

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics (AVR 2016)

Abstract

Latest improvement on mobile devices capabilities definitively changed the way people experience their surroundings. Thanks to the improvement of built in sensors, devices are able to sense the environment at users’ location. The ability to provide contextual services to the visitors is a key aspect to make public parks more accessible, comprehensible end enjoyable. The paper outlines the application of Augmented Reality technologies in a real case scenario. The aim is to equip visitors with an ICT tool able to enhance their perception visiting open spaces and parks. The reporting area chosen for the study case is an Archaeological park, the Cardeto, located within an urban green open space in the outskirts of Ancona, a city in central Italy. Ensuring the success of the experiment has required an hybrid approach, with the main objective of providing visitors with an endless flow of information, anytime and anywhere. To reach this result, a mobile application has been developed, exploiting two different tracking systems: location-based and edge-based. The first one helps users to move along with a network of given Points of Interest disseminated within the park. At the same time, the second system displays a rich set of information each time a user came in close the proximity with artefacts or valuable heritages. This work is part of a wider ongoing project aiming at a better understanding of the potentials inherent the design space for smartphones in context-aware AR applications for tourists. Our experiment demonstrates the validity of purposed methodology as a promising solution for Cultural Heritage purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.corfuar.com, last accessed: April 12, 2016.

  2. 2.

    http://www.cost.eu/domains_actions/tud/Actions/TU1306.

  3. 3.

    https://www.layar.com, last access April 12, 2016.

References

  1. Banterle, F., Cardillo, F.A., Malomo, L.: LecceAR: an augmented reality app for cultural heritage. ERCIM News 103, 16–17 (2015). http://vcg.isti.cnr.it/Publications/2015/BCM15

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chung, N., Han, H., Joun, Y.: Tourists intention to visit a destination: the role of augmented reality (ar) application for a heritage site. Comput. Hum. Behav. 50, 588–599 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clini, P., Frontoni, E., Quattrini, R., Pierdicca, R.: Augmented reality experience: from high-resolution acquisition to real time augmented contents. Adv. Multimedia 2014, 18 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clini, P., Quattrini, R., Frontoni, E., Pierdicca, R., Nespeca, R.: Real/not real: pseudo-holography and augmented reality applications for cultural heritage. In: Handbook of Research on Emerging Technologies for Cultural Heritage (2015, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deliyiannis, I., Papaioannou, G.: Augmented reality for archaeological environments on mobile devices: a novel open framework. Mediterr. Archaeol. Archaeometry 14(4), 1–10 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ding, L., Goshtasby, A.: On the canny edge detector. Pattern Recogn. 34(3), 721–725 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Etxeberria, A.I., Asensio, M., Vicent, N., Cuenca, J.M.: Mobile devices: a tool for tourism and learning at archaeological sites. Int. J. Web Based Communities 8(1), 57–72 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Forte, M.: Cyber-Archaeology. Archaeopress, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garau, C., Ilardi, E.: The non-places meet the places: virtualtours on smartphones for the enhancement of cultural heritage. J. Urban Technol. 21(1), 79–91 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jung, T., Chung, N., Leue, M.C.: The determinants of recommendations to use augmented reality technologies: the case of a Korean theme park. Tourism Manage. 49, 75–86 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kounavis, C.D., Kasimati, A.E., Zamani, E.D.: Enhancing the tourism experience through mobile augmented reality: challenges and prospects. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manage. 4(10), 1–6 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Petit, A., Marchand, E., Kanani, K.: Augmenting markerless complex 3D objects by combining geometrical and color edge information. In: 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pp. 287–288. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pierdicca, R., Frontoni, E., Zingaretti, P., Malinverni, E.S., Colosi, F., Orazi, R.: Making Visible the invisible. augmented reality visualization for 3D reconstructions of archaeological sites. In: De Paolis, L.T., Mongelli, A. (eds.) AVR 2015. LNCS, vol. 9254, pp. 25–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pierdicca, R., Liciotti, D., Contigiani, M., Frontoni, E., Mancini, A., Zingaretti, P.: Low cost embedded system for increasing retail environment intelligence. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pierdicca, R., Malinverni, E.S., Clini, P., Mancini, A., Bozzi, C.A., Nespeca, R.: Development of a GIS environment for archaeological multipurpose applications: the Fano historic centre. In: XIII International Forum Le Vie dei Mercanti, pp. 588–597. IEEE Computer Society (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reitmayr, G., Drummond, T.: Going out: robust model-based tracking for outdoor augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 109–118. IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ruta, M., Scioscia, F., De Filippis, D., Ieva, S., Binetti, M., Di Sciascio, E.: A semantic-enhanced augmented reality tool for openstreetmap POI discovery. Transp. Res. Procedia 3, 479–488 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sturari, M., Liciotti, D., Pierdicca, R., Frontoni, E., Mancini, A., Contigiani, M., Zingaretti, P.: Robust and affordable retail customer profiling by vision and radio beacon sensor fusion. Pattern Recogn. Lett. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tatzgern, M., Grasset, R., Veas, E., Kalkofen, D., Seichter, H., Schmalstieg, D.: Exploring real world points of interest: design and evaluation of object-centric exploration techniques for augmented reality. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 18, 55–70 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dieck, M.C.T., Jung, T.: A theoretical model of mobile augmented reality acceptance in urban heritage tourism. Curr. Issues Tourism 18, 1–21 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vecchio, P., Mele, F., De Paolis, L.T., Epicoco, I., Mancini, M., Aloisio, G.: Cloud computing and augmented reality for cultural heritage. In: De Paolis, L.T., Mongelli, A. (eds.) AVR 2015. LNCS, vol. 9254, pp. 51–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yovcheva, Z., Buhalis, D., Gatzidis, C.: Overview of smartphone augmented reality applications for tourism. e-review of tourism research (ertr) 10(2), 63–66 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yovcheva, Z., Buhalis, D., Gatzidis, C., van Elzakker, C.P.: Empirical evaluation of smartphone augmented reality browsers in an urban tourism destination context. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. (IJMHCI) 6(2), 10–31 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zendjebil, I., Ababsa, F.E., Didier, J.Y., Vairon, J., Frauciel, L., Hachet, M., Guitton, P., Delmont, R.: Outdoor augmented reality: state of the art and issues. In: 10th ACM/IEEE Virtual Reality International Conference (VRIC 2008), pp. 177–187 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been carried out within the Cyberparks project COST Action TU 1306, fostering knowledge about the relationship between Information and Communication Technologies and Public Spaces supported by strategies to improve their use and attractiveness (http://cyberparks-project.eu). The authors would like also to thank Rosanna Petrilli Fonte for her efforts during the development of the presented application.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Pierdicca .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pierdicca, R. et al. (2016). Cyberarchaeology: Improved Way Findings for Archaeological Parks Through Mobile Augmented Reality. In: De Paolis, L., Mongelli, A. (eds) Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics. AVR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9769. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40651-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40651-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40650-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40651-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy