Abstract
The present study investigates the initial level of information literacy (IL) of 308 life sciences students from three Slovenian faculties compared to the level achieved by the students after completing a compulsory credit-bearing IL course. A validated information literacy test (ILT) served as an assessment instrument, and the results were statistically analysed by IL topic, cognitive category and year of study. The students achieved significant progress in all main IL topics and all cognitive categories. The greatest improvement was in the subscale of database searching, where the initial IL level was the lowest. Another IL deficiency that was detected and improved relates to legal and ethical issues. With regard to cognitive categories, the students achieved the most evident progress in the category of applying knowledge, where they were initially the least successful. An analysis of the students’ IL achievements by year of study led to the recommendation to include an IL-related study course in the curriculum of life sciences programmes in the second year of study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Šorgo, A., Bartol, T., Dolničar, D., Boh Podgornik, B.: Attributes of digital natives as predictors of information literacy in higher education. Brit. J. Educ. Technol. (2016). http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12451
Lowe, H., Cook, A.: Mind the gap: are students prepared for higher education? J. Furth. High. Educ. 27(1), 53–76 (2003)
Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Association of College & Research Libraries – ACRL, a Division of the American Library Association - ALA, Chicago (2000). http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency
Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Association of College & Research Libraries – ACRL, a Division of the American Library Association - ALA, Chicago (2016). http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
Harmer, A., Lee, P.: Frameworks, standards, and benchmarks, Oh My! In: Georgia International Conference on Information Literacy (2015). http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gaintlit/2015/2015/39
Elmborg, J.: Critical information literacy: implications for instructional practice. J. Acad. Librariansh. 32(2), 192–199 (2006)
Kos, D., Špiranec, S.: Understanding the field of critical ınformation literacy: a descriptive analysis of scientific articles. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Boustany, J., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Roy, L. (eds.) ECIL 2015. CCIS, vol. 552, pp. 579–589. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28197-1_58
Boh Podgornik, B., Dolničar, D., Šorgo, A., Bartol, T.: Development, testing and validation of an information literacy test (ILT) for higher education. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67, 2420–2436 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23586
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R. (eds.): A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (2001)
Reece, G.J.: Critical thinking and cognitive transfer: implications for the development of online information literacy tutorials. Res. Strateg. 20(4), 482–493 (2005)
Keene, J., Colvin, J., Sissons, J.: Mapping student information literacy activity against Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive skills. J. Inf. Lit. 4(1), 6–21 (2010). http://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/ojs/index.php/JIL/article/view/189
Šumiga, B.: Understanding and use of ınformation literacy in the ındustrial project management. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Boustany, J., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Roy, L. (eds.) ECIL 2015. CCIS, vol. 552, pp. 90–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28197-1_10
Boustany, J.: Information literacy skills of students at paris descartes university. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Catts, R., Špiranec, S. (eds.) ECIL 2013. CCIS, vol. 397, pp. 588–595. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-03919-0_79
Acknowledgements
The study was financially supported by the Slovenian Research Agency, project J55535.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dolničar, D., Boh Podgornik, B., Sajovic, I., Šorgo, A., Bartol, T. (2016). Assessing Content and Cognitive Levels of Information Literacy in a Group of Life Sciences University Students. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., et al. Information Literacy: Key to an Inclusive Society. ECIL 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 676. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52161-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52162-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)