Abstract
This paper presents proposed performance criteria evaluation based on a comparison between sentiment techniques. The target is measuring the sentiments performance through several significant perspectives in sentiment analysis. This measurement is very tight of accuracy evaluating for sentiments. However, evaluating sentiments is a hard challenge for language technologies, and achieving good results is much more difficult than some human think. Also, we introduce a comprehensive study for different sentiment techniques based on proposed performance criteria. The performance evaluation plays a vital role in accuracy measurement through a sentiment analysis word level. The performance criteria include two types of performance measurement namely F-measure and Runtime. These criteria include the balance of performance perspectives priorities. These types include a relationship between perspectives of performance to improve it. There are different performance perspectives: F-measure and speed of run time, memorability, and sentiment analysis challenges. It helps in understanding the contextual meaning and getting a score in less time and higher accuracy. The comparisons are based on the sentiment analysis word-level. They can understand some phrases as do not directly through caring with the classification of reviews. Finally, we show the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed criteria.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bing, L.: Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2012)
Bing, L.: Sentiment Analysis and Subjectivity. In: Nitin, I., Fred, J. (eds.) Handbook of Natural Language Processing. Machine Learning & Pattern Recognition Series, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2010)
Erik, B., Pieter, H., Koen, D.: Automatic sentiment analysis in on-line text. In: Proceedings ELPUB2007 Conference on Electronic Publishing, Vienna, Austria, June 2007
Steven, B., Ewan, K., Edward, L.: Natural Language Processing with Python, 1st edn. O’Reilly Media Publisher, Sebastopol (2009)
Haseena, R.P.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis - challenges and applications. Int. J. Appl. Innov. Eng. Manag. (IJAIEM) 3(5), May 2014, ISSN 2319–4847 (2014)
McCarthy, D., Carroll, J.: Disambiguating Nouns, Verbs, and Adjectives Using Automatically Acquired Selectional Preferences. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)
Turney, P.: Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, July 2002
Georgios, P., Mike, T.: More than bag-of-words: sentence-based document representation for sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, Hissar, Bulgaria, pp. 546–552, September 2013
Yuya, Y., Tomoharu, I., Hiroshi, S.: Latent Support Measure Machines for Bag-of-Words Data Classification. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 (2014)
El-Din, D.M., Mokhtar, H.M.O., Ismael, O.: Online paper review analysis. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. (IJACSA) 6(9) (2015)
ELS: A word-level method for entity-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceeding WIMS 2011, Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics. ACM, USA (2011)
Richard, S., Alex, P., Jean, Y.W., Jason, C., Christopher, D.M., Andrew, Y.N., Christopher, P.: Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2013)
Narayanan, V., Arora, I., Bhatia, A.: Fast and accurate sentiment classification using an enhanced Naive Bayes model. In: Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning IDEAL. Department of Electronics Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41278-3_24
Doaa, M.E.: Enhancement bag-of-words model for solving the challenges of sentiment analysis. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 7(1),·January 2016. doi:10.14569/IJACSA.2016.070134
Torralba, P., Phillip, I., Devi, P., Aude, O.: Isola understanding the intrinsic memorability of images. J. Vis. 12(9), August 2012
Cassani, G., Grimm R., Gillis S., Daelemans W.: Constraining the search space in cross-situational word learning: different models make different predictions. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2016). ISBN 978-0-9911967-3-9
Doaa, M.E.M.: A survey on sentiment analysis challenges. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2016.04.002
Samih,Y., Erdogan,Y.,& Halife, K., “Tagging Accuracy Analysis on Part-of-Speech Taggers”, Journal of Computer and Communications, 2014
Rugved, D., Ketan, V., Suratsingh, R., Tushar, J.: Comparative study of document similarity algorithms and clustering algorithms for sentiment analysis. Int. J. Emerg. Trends Technol. Comput. Sci. (IJETTCS) 3(5), September–October 2014. ISSN 2278-6856
Joseph, V.H., Paul, J.K.: A Comparison of the relational database model and the associative database model. Issues Inf. Syst. X(1) (2009)
Efthymios, K., Theresa, W., Johanna, M.: Twitter sentiment analysis: the good the bad and the OMG! In: Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mohamed, D.M.ED., El-din, M.H.N. (2018). Performance Analysis for Sentiment Techniques Evaluation Perspectives. In: Hassanien, A., Shaalan, K., Gaber, T., Tolba, M. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2017. AISI 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 639. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64861-3_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64861-3_42
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64860-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64861-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)