Abstract
Mind-wandering or loss of focus is a frequently occurring experience for many learners and negatively impacts learning outcomes. While in a classroom setting, a skilled teacher may be able to react to students’ loss of focus, in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) no such intervention is possible (yet). Previous studies suggest a strong relationship between learners’ mind-wandering and their gaze, making it possible to detect mind-wandering in real-time using eye-tracking devices. Existing research in this area though has made use of specialized (and expensive) hardware, and thus cannot be employed in MOOC scenarios due to the inability to scale beyond lab settings. In order to make a step towards scalable mind-wandering detection among online learners, we propose the use of ubiquitously available consumer grade webcams. In a controlled study, we compare the accuracy of mind-wandering detection from gaze data recorded through a standard webcam and recorded through a specialized and high-quality eye tracker. Our results suggest that a large-scale application of webcam-based mind-wandering detection in MOOCs is indeed possible.
C. Hauff—This work is partially supported by the Leiden-Delft-Erasmus Centre for Education and Learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
It is based on an iterative algorithm that each detection runs after the previous detection is finished.
- 3.
The full results, as well as all hyperparameter settings of the classifiers can be found online [25].
References
Bixler, R., D’Mello, S.: Toward fully automated person-independent detection of mind wandering. In: Dimitrova, V., Kuflik, T., Chin, D., Ricci, F., Dolog, P., Houben, G.-J. (eds.) UMAP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8538, pp. 37–48. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08786-3_4
Bixler, R., D’Mello, S.: Automatic gaze-based user-independent detection of mind wandering during computerized reading. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. 26(1), 33–68 (2016)
Bunce, D.M., Flens, E.A., Neiles, K.Y.: How long can students pay attention in class? A study of student attention decline using clickers. J. Chem. Educ. 87(12), 1438–1443 (2010)
Cameron, P., Giuntoli, D.: Consciousness sampling in the college classroom or is anybody listening? Intellect 101(2343), 63–64 (1972)
Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002)
Engbert, R., Kliegl, R.: Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision. Res. 43(9), 1035–1045 (2003)
Johnstone, A.H., Percival, F.: Attention breaks in lectures. Educ. Chem. 13(2), 49–50 (1976)
Killingsworth, M.A., Gilbert, D.T.: A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science 330(6006), 932 (2010)
Lindquist, S.I., McLean, J.P.: Daydreaming and its correlates in an educational environment. Learn. Individ. Differ. 21(2), 158–167 (2011)
Loh, K.K., Tan, B.Z.H., Lim, S.W.H.: Media multitasking predicts video-recorded lecture learning performance through mind wandering tendencies. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 943–947 (2016)
McLeish, J.: The Lecture Method. Cambridge Institute of Education, Cambridge (1968)
McMillan, R., Kaufman, S.B., Singer, J.L.: Ode to positive constructive daydreaming. Front. Psychol. 4, 626 (2013)
Mills, C., Bixler, R., Wang, X., D’Mello, S.K.: Automatic gaze-based detection of mind wandering during narrative film comprehension. In: EDM 2016, pp. 30–37 (2016)
Papoutsaki, A., Daskalova, N., Sangkloy, P., Huang, J., Laskey, J., Hays, J.: Webgazer: scalable webcam eye tracking using user interactions. In: IJCAI 2016, pp. 3839–3845 (2016)
Rayner, K.: Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol. Bull. 124(3), 372–422 (1998)
Risko, E.F., Anderson, N., Sarwal, A., Engelhardt, M., Kingstone, A.: Everyday attention: variation in mind wandering and memory in a lecture. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 26(2), 234–242 (2012)
Rodriguez, O.: The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). Open Praxis 5(1), 67–73 (2013)
Salvucci, D.D., Goldberg, J.H.: Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, pp. 71–78. ACM (2000)
Smallwood, J., Fishman, D.J., Schooler, J.W.: Counting the cost of an absent mind: mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14(2), 230–236 (2007)
Smallwood, J., Schooler, J.W.: The restless mind. Psychol. Bull. 132(6), 946–958 (2006)
Stuart, J., Rutherford, R.: Medical student concentration during lectures. Lancet 312(8088), 514–516 (1978)
Szpunar, K.K., Khan, N.Y., Schacter, D.L.: Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110(16), 6313–6317 (2013)
Tan, T., Zou, H., Chen, C., Luo, J.: Mind wandering and the incubation effect in insight problem solving. Creat. Res. J. 27(4), 375–382 (2015)
Wilson, K., Korn, J.H.: Attention during lectures: beyond ten minutes. Teach. Psychol. 34(2), 85–89 (2007)
Zhao, Y., Lofi, C., Hauff, C.: EC-TEL 2017 companion webpage (2017). https://yue-zhao.github.io/MWDET_Project/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhao, Y., Lofi, C., Hauff, C. (2017). Scalable Mind-Wandering Detection for MOOCs: A Webcam-Based Approach. In: LavouĂ©, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., PĂ©rez-SanagustĂn, M. (eds) Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education. EC-TEL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66609-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66610-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)