Skip to main content

Requirements for Achieving Software Agents Autonomy and Defining Their Responsibility

  • Conference paper
Agents and Computational Autonomy (AUTONOMY 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2969))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of implementing agent-based software systems with respect to agent framework fundamental concepts such as autonomy and interaction without specifying any particular agent internal architecture. The autonomy and interaction axioms imply that a deployment environment has to be defined in order to achieve interaction among agents. This deployment environment may also encode environmental rules and norms of the agent society. The responsibility of an agent is then defined as being in adequacy with its environmental rules. Finally, a formal deployment environment, named MIC*, is presented with a simple application showing how interaction protocols are guaranteed by the deployment environment, which protects agents from non-conform actions and preserve their autonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Castelfranchi, C.: Guarantees for autonomy in cognitive agent architecture. Intelligent Agents: Theories, Architectures, and Languages 890, 56–70 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Demazeau, Y.: From interaction to collective behaviour in agent-based systems. In: 1st European Conference on Cogntive Science, St. Malot, France (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. d’Inverno, M., Luck, M.: A formal view of social dependence networks. In: Zhang, Lukose (eds.) Distributed Artificial Intelligence Architecture and Modelling: Proceedings of the First Australian Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 115–129. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferber, J.: Les Systemes Multi-Agents. Inter Editions (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. FIPA. Foundationofintelligentandphysical agents (1996), http://www.fipa.org

  6. Guessoum, Z., Briot, J.-P.: From active objects to autonomous agents. IEEE Concurrency 7(3), 68–76 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gouaich, A., Guiraud, Y., Michel, F.: Mic∗: An agent formal environment. To appear in the 7th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI 2003), Orlando, USA (July 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Genesereth, M.R., Ketchpel, S.P.: Software agents. Communications of the ACM 37(7), 48–53 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gouaich, A.: Implementing interaction norms is open, distributed and disconnected multi-agent software systems. Submitted to AOSE 2003 (2003), http://www.lirmm.fr/gouaich/research.html

  10. Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.: Agent-based software engineering. In: Software Engineering, vol. 144, pp. 26–37. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: A formal framework for agency and autonomy. In: Lesser, V., Gasser, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1995), pp. 254–260. AAAI Press, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Luck, M., D’Inverno, M.: Autonomy: A nice idea in theory. In: Intelligent Agents VII: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Odell, J.J., Van Dyke Parunak, H., Fleischer, M., Brueckner, S.: Modeling agents and their environment. In: AOSE 2002, AAMAS 2002, Bologna (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Sichman, J.S., Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C., Demazeau, Y.: A social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks. In: Cohn, A.G. (ed.) Proceedings of the Eleventh European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 8-12, pp. 188–192. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Spivey, J.M.: The Z notation A reference manual. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steels, L.: When are robots intelligent autonomous agents? Robotics and Autonomous Systems 15, 3–9 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Intelligent agents: theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review 10(2), 115–152 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gouaich, A. (2004). Requirements for Achieving Software Agents Autonomy and Defining Their Responsibility. In: Nickles, M., Rovatsos, M., Weiss, G. (eds) Agents and Computational Autonomy. AUTONOMY 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2969. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25928-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25928-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22477-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25928-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy