Skip to main content

Semi-Naïve Bayesian Method for Network Intrusion Detection System

  • Conference paper
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5863))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Intrusion detection can be considered as a classification task that attempts to classify a request to access network services as safe or malicious. Data mining techniques are being used to extract valuable information that can help in detecting intrusions. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of rule based classifiers like: JRip, RIDOR, NNge and Decision Table (DT) with Naïve Bayes (NB) along with their ensemble approach. We also propose to use the Semi-Naïve Bayesian approach (DTNB) that combines Naïve Bayes with the induction of Decision Tables in order to enhance the performance of an intrusion detection system. Experimental results show that the proposed approach is faster, reliable, and accurate with low false positive rates, which are the essential features of an efficient network intrusion detection system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MIT Lincoln Laboratory, http://www.ll.mit.edu/IST/ideval/

  2. Annur, N.B., Sallehudin, H., Gani, A., Zakari, O.: Identifying false alarm for network intrusion detection system using hybrid data mining and decision tree. Malaysian journal of computer science 21(2), 101–115 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peddabachigari, S., Abraham, A., Grosan, C., Thomas, J.: Modelling IDS using hybrid intelligent systems. Journal of network and computer applications 30(1), 114–132 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mukkamala, S., Sung, A.H., Abraham, A.: Intrusion detection using an ensemble of intelligent paradigms. Journal of network and computer applications 28(2005), 167–182 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pan, Z.-S., Chen, S.-C., Hu, G.-B., Zhang, D.-Q.: Hybrid neural network and C4.5 for Misuse detection. In: Proc. of International conference on Machine Learning and Cybernatics, Xi’an, November 2-5, pp. 2463–2467. IEEE Press, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kotsiantis, S.B.: Supervised machine learning: A review of classification Techniques. Informatica 31, 249–268 (2007)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Stein, G., Chen, B., Wu, A.S., Hua, K.A.: Decision Tree classifier for network intusion detection with GA-based feature selection. In: Proc. of the 43rd Annual South East Regional Conference, kennesa, Georgia, vol. 12, pp. 136–141 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Katar, C.: Combining multiple techniques for intrusion detection. Intl. Journal of Comp.Sc and Net.Security (IJCSNS) 6(2B), 208–218 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Salzberg, S.: A nearest hyperrectangle learning method. Machine learning 6, 277–309 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roy, S.: Nearest Neighbour with generalization, Christchurch, NZ (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen, W.W.: Fast effective rule induction. In: 12th Intl.Conf. On Machine learning, pp. 115–123 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gaines, B.R., Cronpton, P.: Induction of Ripple-Down rules applied to modelling large databases. Journal of Intelligent information system 5(3), 221–228 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Panda, M., Patra, M.R.: Ensembling rule based classifiers for detecting network intrusions. In: International conference on advances in recent techniques communication techniques (ARTCOM 2009), Kerla, India. IEEE Computer Society Press, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Russel, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A modern approach. International Edition. Pearson US Imports and PHIPES, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Domingos, P., Pizzani, M.J.: On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Mach.learning 29(2-3), 103–130 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hall, M., Frank, E.: Combining Naïve Bayes and Decision Tables. In: Wilson, D.L., Chad, H. (eds.) Proc. of the 21st Intl. Florida Artificial Intelligence society conference (FLAIRS), pp. 318–319. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Panda, M., Patra, M.R. (2009). Semi-Naïve Bayesian Method for Network Intrusion Detection System. In: Leung, C.S., Lee, M., Chan, J.H. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5863. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10677-4_70

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10677-4_70

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10676-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10677-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy