Abstract
Natural Language Generation (nlg) systems generate texts in English and other human languages from non-linguistic input data. Usually there are a large number of possible texts that can communicate the input data, and nlg systems must choose one of these. This decision can partially be based on style (interpreted broadly). We explore three mechanisms for incorporating style into nlg choice-making: (1) explicit stylistic parameters, (2) imitating a genre style, and (3) imitating an individual’s style.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AECMA (1986) A guide for the preparation of aircraft maintenance documentation in the international aerospace maintenance language. BDC Publishing Services, Slack Lane, Derby
Belz A (2005) Statistical generation: three methods compared and evaluated. In: Proceedings of ENLG-2005, Aberdeen, pp 15–23
Belz A, Reiter E (2006) Comparing automatic and human evaluation of NLG systems. In: Proceedings of EACL-2006, Trento, pp 313–320
Berry D, Knapp P, Raynor T (2002) Is 15 percent very common? Informing people about the risks of medication side effects. Int J Pharm Pract 10:145–151
Biber D (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
Bouayad-Agha N, Scott D, Power R (2001) The influence of layout on the interpretation of referring expressions. In: Degand L, Bestgen Y, Spooren W, van Waes L (eds) Multidisciplinary approaches to discourse. Stichting Neerlandistiek VU Amsterdam and Nodus Publikationen, Munster, pp 133–141
Buchanan B, Moore J, Forsythe D, Carenini G, Ohlsson S, Banks G (1995) An interactive system for delivering individualized information to patients. Artif Intell Med 7:117–154
Cawsey A, Jones R, Pearson J (2000) The evaluation of a personalised health information system for patients with cancer. User Model User-Adapt Interact 10:47–72
DiMarco C, Hirst G, Hovy EH (1997) Generation by selection and repair as a method for adapting text for the individual reader. In: Proceedings of the workshop on flexible hypertext, 8th ACM international hypertext conference, Southampton, NH
Goldberg E, Driedger N, Kittredge R (1994) Using natural-language processing to produce weather forecasts. IEEE Expert 9(2):45–53
Harley T (2001) The psychology of language, 2nd edn. Psychology, Hove
Hovy E (1990) Pragmatics and natural language generation. Artif Intell 43:153–198
Huang X, Fiedler A (1997) Proof verbalization as an application of NLG. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-1997, vol 2. Nagoya, pp 965–972
Just M, Carpenter P (1992) A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychol Rev 99:122–149
Lavoie B, Rambow O (1997) A fast and portable realizer for text generation. In: Proceedings of the 5th conference on applied natural-language processing (ANLP-1997), Washington, DC, pp 265–268
Lin J (2006) Using distributional similarity to identify individual verb choice. In: Proceedings of the 4th international natural language generation conference, Sydney, pp 33–40
McKeown K (1985) Text generation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
McKeown K, Kukich K, Shaw J (1994) Practical issues in automatic document generation. In: Proceedings of ANLP-1994, Stuttgart, pp 7–14
O’Donnell M, Mellish C, Oberlander J, Knott A (2001) ILEX: an architecture for a dynamic hypertext generation system. Nat Lang Eng 7:225–250
Paiva D, Evans R (2005) Empirically-based control of natural language generation. In: Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (ACL’05). Association for Computational Linguistics, Ann Arbor, MI, pp 58–65
Power R, Scott D, Bouayad-Agha N (2003) Generating texts with style. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on intelligent text processing and computational linguistics (CICLing’03), Mexico City, pp 444–452
Reiter E, Dale R (2000) Building natural language generation systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
Reiter E, Robertson R, Osman L (2003) Lessons from a failure: generating tailored smoking cessation letters. Artif Intell 144:41–58
Reiter E, Sripada S (2002) Human variation and lexical choice. Comput Linguist 28:545–553
Reiter E, Sripada S, Hunter J, Yu J (2005) Choosing words in computer-generated weather forecasts. Artif Intell 167:137–169
Reiter E, Sripada S, Robertson R (2003) Acquiring correct knowledge for natural language generation. J Artif Intell Res 18:491–516
Reiter E, Sripada S, Williams S (2003) Acquiring and using limited user models in NLG. In: Proceedings of 2003 European natural language generation workshop, Budapest, pp 87–94
Schober M, Conrad F, Fricker S (2004) Misunderstanding standardized language in research interviews. Appl Cogn Psychol 18:169–188
Walker M, Stent A, Mairesse F, Prasad R (2007) Individual and domain adaptation in sentence planning for dialogue. J Artif Intell Res 30:413–456
Williams S, Reiter E (2005) Deriving content selection rules from a corpus of non-naturally occurring documents for a novel NLG application. In: Proceedings of corpus linguistics workshop on using corpora for NLG, Birmingham
Williams S, Reiter E (2005) Generating readable texts for readers with low basic skills. In: Proceedings of ENLG-2005, Aberdeen, pp 140–147
Williams S, Reiter E (2008) Generating basic skills reports for low-skilled readers. Nat Language Eng 14:495–535
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank our colleagues in Aberdeen and Milton Keynes, the anonymous reviewers, and the tutors we worked with in SkillSum for their insightful comments and suggestions. We also thank the attendees of the AISB 2008 Symposium on “Style in Text: Creative Generation and Identification of Authorship” (where we presented an earlier version of this paper) for their help and suggestions. This work was funded by PACCIT-LINK grant ESRC RES-328-25-0026.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reiter, E., Williams, S. (2010). Generating Texts in Different Styles. In: Argamon, S., Burns, K., Dubnov, S. (eds) The Structure of Style. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12337-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12337-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12336-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12337-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)