Skip to main content

Automated Model-to-Metamodel Transformations Based on the Concepts of Deep Instantiation

  • Conference paper
Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6981))

Abstract

Numerous systems, especially component-based systems, are based on a multi-phase development process where an ontological hierarchy is established. Solutions based on modeling / metamodeling can be used for such systems, but all of them are afflicted with different drawbacks. The main problem is that elements representing both CLAsses and oBJECTs (clabjects), which are needed to specify an ontological hierarchy, are not supported by standard metamodeling frameworks. This paper presents the combination of two approaches, namely deep instantiation and model-to-metamodel transformations. The resulting approach combines the clean and compact specification of deep instantiation with the easy applicability of model-to-metamodel transformations in an automated way. Along with this a set of generic operators to specify these transformations is identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bézivin, J.: In search of a basic principle for model driven engineering. UPGRADE- The European Journal for the Informatics Professional 5(2), 21–24 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: The essence of multilevel metamodeling. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 19–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Kainz, G., Buckl, C., Sommer, S., Knoll, A.: Model-to-metamodel transformation for the development of component-based systems. In: Petriu, D.C., Rouquette, N., Haugen, Ø. (eds.) MODELS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6395, pp. 391–405. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson, C.: Meta-modeling for distributed object environments. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, EDOC 1997, Washington, USA, pp. 90–101 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Model-driven development: A metamodeling foundation. IEEE Software 20(5), 36–41 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eker, J., Janneck, J., Lee, E.A., Liu, J., Liu, X., Ludvig, J., Sachs, S., Xiong, Y.: Taming heterogeneity - the ptolemy approach. Proceedings of the IEEE 91(1), 127–144 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kühne, T., Schreiber, D.: Can programming be liberated from the two-level style: multi-level programming with deepjava. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems and Applications. OOPSLA 2007, Montreal, Canada, pp. 229–244 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Processes and products in a multi-level metamodeling architecture. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 11(6), 761–783 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gutheil, M., Kennel, B., Atkinson, C.: A systematic approach to connectors in a multi-level modeling environment. In: Busch, C., Ober, I., Bruel, J.-M., Uhl, A., Völter, M. (eds.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5301, pp. 843–857. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Odell, J.: Power types. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming 7(2), 8–12 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martin, J., Odell, J.J.: Object-oriented methods: a foundation, UMLed, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bragança, A., Machado, R.J.: Transformation patterns for multi-staged model driven software development. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Software Product Line Conference, SPLC 2008, Washington, USA, pp. 329–338 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Object Management Group (OMG): Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification Version 2.0 (January 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., Merks, E.: EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kainz, G., Buckl, C., Knoll, A. (2011). Automated Model-to-Metamodel Transformations Based on the Concepts of Deep Instantiation. In: Whittle, J., Clark, T., Kühne, T. (eds) Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. MODELS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6981. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24485-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24485-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24484-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24485-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy