Skip to main content

Finite State Verifiers with Constant Randomness

  • Conference paper
How the World Computes (CiE 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7318))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We give a new characterization of NL as the class of languages whose members have certificates that can be verified with small error in polynomial time by finite state machines that use a constant number of random bits, as opposed to its conventional description in terms of deterministic logarithmic-space verifiers. It turns out that allowing two-way interaction with the prover does not change the class of verifiable languages, and that no polynomially bounded amount of randomness is useful for constant-memory computers when used as language recognizers, or public-coin verifiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Condon, A.: Computational Models of Games. MIT Press (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Condon, A.: Space-bounded probabilistic game automata. Journal of the ACM 38(2), 472–494 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Condon, A.: The complexity of the max word problem and the power of one-way interactive proof systems. Computational Complexity 3(3), 292–305 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Condon, A.: The complexity of space bounded interactive proof systems. In: Complexity Theory: Current Research, pp. 147–190. Cambridge University Press (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Condon, A., Ladner, R.: Interactive proof systems with polynomially bounded strategies. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 50(3), 506–518 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Condon, A., Lipton, R.J.: On the complexity of space bounded interactive proofs. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. pp. 462–467 (1989), http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1398514.1398732

  7. Dwork, C., Stockmeyer, L.: A time complexity gap for two-way probabilistic finite-state automata. SIAM Journal on Computing 19(6), 1011–1123 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dwork, C., Stockmeyer, L.: Finite state verifiers I: The power of interaction. Journal of the ACM 39(4), 800–828 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Freivalds, R.: Probabilistic two-way machines. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 33–45 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldwasser, S., Sipser, M.: Private coins versus public coins in interactive proof systems. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 1986), pp. 59–68 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hartmanis, J.: On non-determinancy in simple computing devices. Acta Informatica 1, 336–344 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Holzer, M., Kutrib, M., Malcher, A.: Complexity of multi-head finite automata: Origins and directions. Theoretical Computer Science 412, 83–96 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaņeps, J.: Stochasticity of the languages acceptable by two-way finite probabilistic automata. Diskretnaya Matematika 1, 63–67 (1989) (Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaņeps, J., Freivalds, R.: Running Time to Recognize Nonregular Languages by 2-Way Probabilistic Automata. In: Leach Albert, J., Monien, B., Rodríguez-Artalejo, M. (eds.) ICALP 1991. LNCS, vol. 510, pp. 174–185. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Macarie, I.I.: Space-efficient deterministic simulation of probabilistic automata. SIAM Journal on Computing 27(2), 448–465 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Shamir, A.: IP = PSPACE. Journal of the ACM 39(4), 869–877 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Say, A.C.C., Yakaryılmaz, A. (2012). Finite State Verifiers with Constant Randomness. In: Cooper, S.B., Dawar, A., Löwe, B. (eds) How the World Computes. CiE 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7318. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30870-3_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30870-3_65

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30869-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30870-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy