Skip to main content

Retracted: Modeling and Verifying the Kernel of RTOS

  • Conference paper
Information Computing and Applications (ICICA 2012)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 307))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1256 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a study on modeling and verifying the kernel of Real-Time Operating Systems (RTOS). Advances in formally verifying such an RTOS both by refinement and by model checking approaches will be shown in this paper. The focus of the paper will be on verifying FreeRTOS. A number of ways to verify this operating system are investigated in the paper. At last, a preliminary set-up of verifying FreeRTOS using model checking is presented.

An Erratum for this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34038-3_116

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dijkstra, E.W.: Notes on structured programming. In: Dahl, O.J., Dijkstra, E.W., Hoare, C.A.R. (eds.) Structured Programming. Academic Press (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jones, C., O’Hearn, P., Woodcock, J.: Verified software: A grand challenge. IEEE Computer: Software Technologies 39, 93–95 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. proB, http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/proB

  4. Clarke, E., Grumberg, O., Jha, S., Lu, Y., Veith, H.: Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement for symbolic model checking. Journal of the ACM 50 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Java Path Finder, http://babelfish.arc.nasa.gov/trac/jpf

  6. Uppaal. The Uppaal model checker, http://www.uppaal.org

  7. Baier, C., Katoen, J.P.: Principles of Model Checking. The MIT Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holzmann, G.J., Joshi, R., Groce, A.: Model driven code checking. Autom. Softw. Eng., 283–297 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zaks, A., Joshi, R.: Verifying Multi-threaded C Programs with SPIN. In: Havelund, K., Majumdar, R. (eds.) SPIN 2008. LNCS, vol. 5156, pp. 325–342. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gallardo, M.M., Merino, P., Sanán, D.: Model checking dynamic memory allocation in operating systems. J. Autom. Reasoning 42, 229–264 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gong, S. (2012). Retracted: Modeling and Verifying the Kernel of RTOS. In: Liu, C., Wang, L., Yang, A. (eds) Information Computing and Applications. ICICA 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 307. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34038-3_84

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34038-3_84

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34037-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34038-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy