Skip to main content

Multi-atlas and Gaussian Mixture Modeling Based Perirectal Fat Segmentation from CT Images

  • Conference paper
Abdominal Imaging. Computation and Clinical Applications (ABD-MICCAI 2013)

Abstract

Accurate perirectal fat segmentation in CT images aids in estimating radiation dose delivered to the region of fat around the rectum during radiation therapy treatment of prostate cancer. Such a process is important in determining the resulting toxicity of the neighboring tissues. However automatic or semi-automatic segmentation of the perirectal fat in CT images is a challenging task due to inter patient anatomical variability, contrast variability and imaging artifacts. We propose a combined schema of multi-atlas and multi parametric Gaussian mixture modeling for perirectal fat segmentation in CT images. Multi-atlas based soft segmentation and multi parametric Gaussian mixture modeling aids in identifying the volume of interest (VOI). Thereafter expectation maximization (EM) based soft clustering of the intensities of the VOI refined with positional probabilities of the perirectal fat provides the segmentation of the perirectal fat. The proposed method achieves a mean sensitivity value of 0.88±0.07 and a mean specificity value of 0.998±0.001 with 5 patient datasets in a leave-one-patient-out validation framework. Qualitative results show a good approximation of the perirectal fat volume compared to the ground truth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chandra, S.S., Dowling, J., Shen, K.K., Raniga, P., Pluim, J.P.W., Greer, P.B., Salvado, O., Fripp, J.: Patient specific prostate segmentation in 3D magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 31(10), 1955–1964 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clinical Trials, A.G.: Randomised androgen deprivation and radiotherapy (RADAR) trial (2013), http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov (accessed on May 19, 2013)

  3. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B.: Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 39, 1–38 (1977)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao, Y., Sandhu, R., Fichtinger, G., Tannenbaum, A.R.: A Coupled Global Registration and Segmentation Framework with Application to Magnetic Resonance Prostate Imagery. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 10, 17–81 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Australian Government: Cancer in Australia an overview 2012 (2013), http://www.aihw.gov.au (accessed on May 20, 2013)

  6. Klein, S., van der Heide, U.A., Lipps, I.M., Vulpen, M.V., Staring, M., Pluim, J.P.W.: Automatic Segmentation of the Prostate in 3D MR Images by Atlas Matching Using Localized Mutual Information. Medical Physics 35, 1407–1417 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liao, S., Gao, Y., Lian, J., Shen, D.: Sparse patch-based label propagation for accurate prostate localization in CT images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 32(2), 419–434 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Modat, M., Ridgway, G.R., Taylor, Z.A., Lehmann, M., Barnes, J., Hawkes, D.J., Fox, N.C., Ourselin, S.: Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 98(3), 278–284 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ourselin, S., Roche, A., Subsol, G., Pennec, X., Ayache, N.: Reconstructing a 3D structure from serial histological sections. Image Vision Comput. 19(1-2), 25–31 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L.I., Hayes, C., Hill, D.L.G., Leach, M.O., Hawkes, D.J.: Non-rigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18(8), 712–721 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Studholme, C., Hill, D.L.J., Hawkes, D.J.: An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment. Pattern Recognition 72(1), 71–86 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Theodoridis, Koutroumbas.: Pattern Recognition, 4th edn. Academic Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ghose, S. et al. (2013). Multi-atlas and Gaussian Mixture Modeling Based Perirectal Fat Segmentation from CT Images. In: Yoshida, H., Warfield, S., Vannier, M.W. (eds) Abdominal Imaging. Computation and Clinical Applications. ABD-MICCAI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8198. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41083-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41083-3_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41082-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41083-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy