Abstract
This paper introduces the application of three techniques to improve the performance of one-bit differential detection (DD). The Gaussian minimum shift keying (GMSK) modulation technique is employed. The proposed techniques are spread spectrum, offset receiver diversity and decision feedback (DF). A comparative study shows that when applying the direct sequence spread spectrum (DS-SS), the performance is improved by 9.3 dB at a bit error rate (BER) of 10−3 and the processing gain is equal to 10 relative to that given by Elnoubi [IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech. VT-35(1986)162–167]. When using the offset receiver diversity technique, the corresponding relative improvement is 13 dB. When employing both SS and offset diversity at the same BER, 22 and 25.7 dB improvements are attained for DS and frequency hopping (FH), respectively. A further improvement of about 1 dB is obtained when DF is used.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
H.R. Mathwich, J.F. Balcewicz and M. Hecht, The effect of tandem band and amplitude limiting on theE b/N 0 performance of minimum (frequency) shift keying (MSK), IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-22(1974)1525.
M.G. Pelchat, Coherent demodulation of continuous phase binary FSK signals, Paper presented at the Int. Telemetry Conf. (1971).
S. Gronemeyer, MSK and OQPSK modulation, IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-24(1976)809–820.
H.C. Chan, D.P. Taylor and S.S. Haykin, A comparative study of digital modulations techniques for single-carrier satellite communications, Paper presented at the 3rd Int. Conf. on Digital Satellite Communications, Kyoto, Japan, 1975, Paper B2.
S.M. Elnoubi, Probability of error analysis of digital partial response continuous phase modulation with noncoherent detection in mobile radio channels, IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech. VT-38(1989) 19–30.
S.M. Elnoubi, Analysis of GMSK with differential detection in land mobile channels, IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech. VT-35(1986)162–167.
S.M. Elnoubi, Probability of error analysis of digital partial response continuous phase modulation with 2-bit differential detection and offset receiver diversity in fast Rayleigh fading channels, IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-38(1990)782–786.
S.M. Elnoubi, Analysis of GMSK with two-bit differential detection in land mobile radio channels, IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-35(1987)237–240.
M.K. Simon and C.C. Wang, Differential detection of Gaussian MSK in a mobile radio environment, IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech. VT-33(1984)307–320.
R.C. Dixon,Spread Spectrum Systems (Wiley, 1976).
M. Schwartz et al.,Communication Systems and Techniques (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986) appendix B.
T. Masamura, Frequency offset receiver diversity for differential MSK, IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech. VT-36(1987)63–70.
S.M. Elnoubi, Performance of a transmitter diversity MSK mobile radio system with 2-bit differential detection, IEEE Military Commun. Conf., Washington, DC, 1983, pp. 661–665.
P. Varshney, E. Salt and S. Kumar, BER analysis of GMSK with differential detection in a land mobile channel, IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech. VT-42(1993)683–689.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Hussaini, E.K., Soliman, K.A.M. Performance of offset receiver diversity for GMSK and spread spectrum GMSK with one-bit differential detection using decision feedback in fast Rayleigh channels. Telecommunication Systems 3, 223–238 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110306
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110306