Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Design and validation of IoT based smart classroom

  • 1229: Multimedia Data Analysis for Smart City Environment Safety
  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The smart campus is an educational campus concept that uses innovative technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), cloud computing, with integrated information systems to support learning, teaching and administrative activities. It is one of the important outputs of smart campus applications that these technologies support students, lecturers, and administrators by performing multi-tasking in multi-functional buildings. It is an important step to create smart classrooms with intelligent systems with the aim of developing a smart campus. For this reason, it is necessary to create smart classrooms for a smart campus and to expand it throughout the campus. In this study, it is aimed to monitor the environmental parameters in the classroom environments in real time and to develop a smart classroom concept that provides energy savings and air conditioning based on the analysis of these data. It is expected that an educational effect will occur on the attention span of the students through the automatic improvement of physical conditions as well as administrative convenience in terms of ensuring security and increasing savings in company with an efficient and applicable system architecture. In this study, tests were performed for 7 different scenarios and the best accuracy and sensitivity were calculated as 98%, and the best specifity as 100%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Abadi M, Barham P, Chen J, Chen Z, Davis A, Dean J, ... Zheng X (2016) TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning. In 12th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI 16) (pp 265–283)

  2. Abdel-Basset M, Manogaran G, Mohamed M, Rushdy E (2019) Internet of things in smart education environment: Supportive framework in the decision-making process. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 31(10):e4515. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aju OG (2015) A survey of zigbee wireless sensor network technology: Topology, applications and challenges. International Journal of Computer Applications 130(9):47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anoopa S, Salim A (2022) Survey on anomaly detection in surveillance videos. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.171

  5. Albarakati AJ, Qayyum J, Fakeeh KA (2014) A survey on 6LowPAN & its future research challenges. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing 3(10):558–570

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aldowah H, Rehman SU, Ghazal S, Umar IN (2017, September) Internet of Things in higher education: a study on future learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 892(1):012017. IOP Publishing

  7. Brittany A, Katie H (2011) The classroom environment: The silent curriculum

  8. Bagheri M, Movahed SH (2016, November) The effect of the Internet of Things (IoT) on education business model. In 2016 12th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS) (pp 435–441). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SITIS.2016.74

  9. Caţă M (2015) Smart university, a new concept in the Internet of Things. In: IEEE. pp 195–197

  10. Cheng YC (1994) Classroom environment and student affective performance: An effective profile. The Journal of experimental education 62(3):221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1994.9943842

  11. Coley DA, Beisteiner A (2002) Carbon dioxide levels and ventilation rates in schools. International journal of ventilation 1(1):45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui X, Liu Q, Gao M, Metaxas DN (2011, June) Abnormal detection using interaction energy potentials. In CVPR 2011 (pp 3161–3167). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995558

  13. Darbyshire JL, Young JD (2013) An investigation of sound levels on intensive care units with reference to the WHO guidelines. Critical Care 17(5):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Enugala VPR, Vuppala S (2018, December). Internet of Things-based Smart Classroom Environment. In 2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC) (pp 193–198). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PDGC.2018.8745883

  15. Gao J, Wargocki P, Wang Y (2014) Ventilation system type and the resulting classroom temperature and air quality during heating season. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (pp 203–214). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39584-0_23

  16. Garg R, Sharma S (2018) Modified and improved IPv6 header compression (MIHC) scheme for 6LoWPAN. Wireless Personal Communications 103(3):2019–2033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldena NJ (2022) Essentials of the Internet of Things (IoT). Technology, Tools, and Use Cases, Enterprise Digital Transformation, pp 49–99

  18. Griffiths M, Eftekhari M (2008) Control of CO2 in a naturally ventilated classroom. Energy and Buildings 40(4):556–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gul S, Asif M, Ahmad S, Yasir M, Majid M, Malik MSA, Arshad S (2017) A survey on role of internet of things in education. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 17(5):159–165

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haghi A, Burney K, Kidd FS, Valiente L, Peng Y (2017, June) Fast-paced development of a smart campus IoT platform. In 2017 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS) (pp 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GIOTS.2017.8016214

  21. Hasan MT, Akter T (2020) A Quantitative Survey on Smart Classroom with IoT. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology 7(6):12121–12126

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hentschel K, Jacob D, Singer J, Chalmers M (2016, August) Supersensors: Raspberry Pi devices for smart campus infrastructure. In 2016 IEEE 4th International conference on future internet of things and cloud (FiCloud) (pp 58–62). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FiCloud.2016.16

  23. Heo YJ, Oh SM, Chin WS, Jang JW (2015, August) A lightweight platform implementation for internet of things. In 2015 3rd International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (pp 526–531). IEEE

  24. Hill MC, Epps KK (2010) The impact of physical classroom environment on student satisfaction and student evaluation of teaching in the university environment. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 14(4):65

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huang LS, Su JY, Pao TL (2019) A context aware smart classroom architecture for smart campuses. Appl Sci 9(9):1837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Imran K, Anjum N, Alghamdi A, Shaikh A, Hamdi M, Mahfooz S (2022) A Secure and Efficient Cluster-Based Authentication Scheme for Internet of Things (IoTs). Computers, Materials & Continua 70(1):1033–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kolokotsa D, Gobakis K, Papantoniou S, Georgatou C, Kampelis N, Kalaitzakis K, ... Santamouris M (2016) Development of a web based energy management system for University Campuses: The CAMP-IT platform. Energy and Buildings 123:119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.038

  28. Lau BPL, Wijerathne N, Ng BKK, Yuen C (2017) Sensor fusion for public space utilization monitoring in a smart city. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 5(2):473–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lajevardi SM, Hussain ZM (2012) Automatic facial expression recognition: feature extraction and selection. SIViP 6(1):159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li BP, Kong SC, Chen G (2015) A study on the development of the smart classroom scale. In Emerging issues in smart learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44188-6_6

  31. Marques G, Pitarma R (2019) An internet of things-based environmental quality management system to supervise the indoor laboratory conditions. Appl Sci 9(3):438. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9030438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maxwell LE, Evans GW (2002) Museums as learning settings: the importance of the physical environment. Journal of Museum Education 27(1):3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Murugesan S (2008) Harnessing green IT: Principles and practices. IT professional 10(1):24–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2008.10

  34. Palma D, Agudo JE, Sánchez H, Macías MM (2014) An internet of things example: Classrooms access control over near field communication. Sensors 14(4):6998–7012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Poysner LR (1983) An Examination of the Classroom Physical Environment

  36. Rajak CK, Soni U, Biswas B, Shrivastava AK (2021, August) Real-time web based Timing display Application for Test Range Applications. In 2021 2nd International Conference on Range Technology (ICORT) (pp 1–6). IEEE

  37. Ramli NH, Ahmad S, Masri MH (2013) Improving the classroom physical environment: Classroom users’ perception. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 101:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rathore MM, Ahmad A, Paul A (2016, October) IoT-based smart city development using big data analytical approach. In 2016 IEEE international conference on automatica (ICA-ACCA) (pp 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICA-ACCA.2016.7778510

  39. Razzaq AN, Ghazali R, El Abbadi NK (2021, July) Face Recognition-Extensive Survey and Recommendations. In 2021 International Congress of Advanced Technology and Engineering (ICOTEN) (pp 1–10). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOTEN52080.2021.9493444

  40. Revathi AR, Kumar D (2017) An efficient system for anomaly detection using deep learning classifier. Signal, Image and Video Processing 11(2):291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Savolainen T, Soininen J, Silverajan B (2013) IPv6 addressing strategies for IoT. IEEE Sensors Journal 13(10):3511–3519. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2013.2259691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Şahin İT, Tantekin-Erden F, Akar H (2011) The influence of the physical environment on early childhood education classroom management. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 44:185–202

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sabokrou M, Fayyaz M, Fathy M, Moayed Z, Klette R (2018) Deep-anomaly: Fully convolutional neural network for fast anomaly detection in crowded scenes. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 172:88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2018.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Saini MK, Goel N (2019) How smart are smart classrooms? A review of smart classroom technologies. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 52(6):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Taylor K (2008) Lamoreaux A (2008) Teaching with the brain in mind. New directions for adult and continuing education 119:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tomar R, Dangi S (2021) JavaScript: Syntax and Practices. Chapman and Hall/CRC

  47. Uzelac A, Gligoric N, Krco S (2015) A comprehensive study of parameters in physical environment that impact students’ focus during lecture using Internet of Things. Computers in Human Behavior 53:427–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Uzelac A, Gligorić N, Krčo S (2018) System for recognizing lecture quality based on analysis of physical parameters. Telematics and Informatics 35(3):579–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vosko RS, Hiemstra R (1988) The adult learning environment: Importance of physical features. International Journal of Lifelong Education 7(3):185–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137880070303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang Y, Saez B, Szczechowicz J, Ruisi J, Kraft T, Toscano S, ... Nicolas K (2017, October) A smart campus internet of things framework. In 2017 IEEE 8th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON) (pp 498–503). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON.2017.8249106

  51. Wang T, Qiao M, Zhu A, Niu Y, Li C, Snoussi H (2018) Abnormal event detection via covariance matrix for optical flow based feature. Multimedia Tools and Applications 77(13):17375–17395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yang Z, Becerik-Gerber B, Mino L (2013) A study on student perceptions of higher education classrooms: Impact of classroom attributes on student satisfaction and performance. Building and Environment 70:171–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yibo C, Hou KM, Zhou H, Shi HL, Liu X, Diao X, ... de Vaulx C (2011, September). 6LoWPAN stacks: A survey. In 2011 7th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (pp 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/wicom.2011.6040344

  54. Zhang M, Li X (2021) Design of Smart Classroom System Based on Internet of Things Technology and Smart Classroom. Mobile Information Systems, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5438878

  55. Zhang D, Lin S, Fu Y, Huang S (2017, October) The communication system between web application host computers and embedded systems based on Node. JS. In 2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI) (pp 1–5). IEEE

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Atatürk University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit. Project number: FOA-2020-7563.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey

    Mete Yağanoğlu, Ferhat Bozkurt & F. Baturalp Günay

  2. Faculty of Open Education, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey

    Sinan Kul

  3. Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Turkey

    Emrah Şimşek

  4. Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey

    Gökhan Öztürk

  5. Department of Management Information Systems, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University, Ankara, Turkey

    Selçuk Karaman

Authors
  1. Mete Yağanoğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ferhat Bozkurt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Baturalp Günay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sinan Kul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Emrah Şimşek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gökhan Öztürk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Selçuk Karaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mete Yağanoğlu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has declared that no conflict of interests or competing interests exist.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yağanoğlu, M., Bozkurt, F., Günay, F.B. et al. Design and validation of IoT based smart classroom. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 62019–62043 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15872-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15872-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy