Abstract
Monroe Eskew (Tree properties on \(\omega _1\) and \(\omega _2\), 2016. https://mathoverflow.net/questions/217951/tree-properties-on-omega-1-and-omega-2) asked whether the tree property at \(\omega _2\) implies there is no Kurepa tree (as is the case in the Mitchell model, or under PFA). We prove that the tree property at \(\omega _2\) is consistent with the existence of \(\omega _1\)-trees with as many branches as desired.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, U.: Aronszajn trees on \(\aleph _2\) and \(\aleph _3\). Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 24, 213–230 (1983)
Baumgartner, J.: Applications of the Proper Forcing Axiom. In: Kunen, K., Vaughan, J. (eds.) The Handbook of Set-Theoretic Topology, pp. 913–959. North-Holland, Oxford (1984)
Eskew, M.: Tree properties on \(\omega _1\) and \(\omega _2\). https://mathoverflow.net/questions/217951/tree-properties-on-omega-1-and-omega-2 (2015). Accessed 23 May 2016
Mitchell, W.: Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley (1970)
Mitchell, W.: Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property. Ann. Math. Log. 5, 21–46 (1972)
Stewart, D.: The consistency of the Kurepa hypothesis with the axioms of set theory, Master’s thesis, University of Bristol (1966)
Silver, J.: The independence of Kurepa’s conjecture and two-cardinal conjectures in model theory, In: Scott, D. (Ed.) Axiomatic Set Theory (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Volume XIII, Part I), American Mathematical Society, Providence RI, pp. 383–390 (1971)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was partially supported by National Science Foundation grant DMS-1500790. I would like to thank the School of Mathematics at the IPM in Tehran for their warm hospitality in October 2015, with special thanks to Mohammad Golshani for many interesting conversations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cummings, J. Aronszajn and Kurepa trees. Arch. Math. Logic 57, 83–90 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-017-0579-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-017-0579-y