Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: PSO-based optimization for EEG data and SVM for efficient deceit identification

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 19 August 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Deception is a well-known term that involves acting in a way that it leads another person to believe something that is not true. Deception is a very common occurrence in daily life, and many times it becomes a big problem for national security. To cope with this problem, deception detection has gained a lot of attention recently. In this paper, we have tried to come up with a deceit identification system where we have used electroencephalograph (EEG) data collected by performing a concealed information test. To improve the performance of the system, first we have tried to select the optimal subset of the EEG channels using binary particle swarm optimization and secondly performed support vector machine hyper-parameter optimization using continuous version of PSO. The proposed model is validated using EEG dataset. The performance of the proposed system has resulted in increase of accuracy from 76.98 to 96.45% which is a significant improvement. Also, the proposed approach outperformed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, F1-score and G-measure when compared with state-of-the-art models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Availability of data and materials

This is not applicable.

Code availability

This is not applicable.

Change history

References

  • Abootalebi V, Moradi MH, Khalilzadeh MA (2009) A new approachfor EEG feature extraction in P300-based lie detection. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 94(1):48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhavan A, Moradi MH, Vand SR (2017) Subject-based discriminative sparse representation model for detection of concealed information. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 143:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arasteh A, Moradi MH, Janghorbani A (2016) A novel method based on empirical mode decomposition for P300-based detection of deception. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 11(11):2584–2593

  • Bablani A, Edla DR, Tripathi D, Venkatanareshbabu K (2018) Subject based deceit identification using empirical mode decomposition. Procedia Comput Sci 132:32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bablani A, Edla DR, Tripathi D, Dodia S, Chintala S (2019) A synergistic concealed information test with novel approach for EEG channel selection and SVM parameter optimization. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 14(11):3057–3068. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2019.2913798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edla D et al (2021) An efficient deep learning paradigm for deceit identification test on EEG signals. ACM Trans Manag Inf Syst (TMIS) 12(3):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farahani ED, Moradi MH (2017) Multimodal detection of concealed information using genetic-SVM classifier with strict validation structure. Inform Med Unlocked 9:58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farwell LA, Donchin E (1991) The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy (lie detection) with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 28(5):531–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Wang Z, Yang Y, Zhang W, Tao C et al (2013) A novel approach for lie detection based on F-score and extreme learning machine. PLoS One 8(6):e64704. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath F (2003) The polygraph and lie detection, 3rd edn. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenke R, Peer A, Buss M (2014) Feature extraction and selection for emotion recognition from EEG. IEEE Trans Affect Comput 5(3):327–339. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2014.2339834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykken DT (1959) The GSR in the detection of guilt. J Appl Psychol 43(6):385–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council et al (1982) Detecting deception: the promise and the reality of voice stress analysis. J Forensic Sci 27(2):340–351. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS11488J

  • Ramadan RA, Vasilakos AV (2017) Brain computer interface: control signals review. Neurocomputing 223:26–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizk-Allah Rizk M, Hassanien A (2018) New binary bat algorithm for solving 0–1 knapsack problem. Complex Intell Syst 4:31–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyedali M, Andrew L (2013) S-shaped versus V-shaped transfer functions for binary particle swarm optimization. Swarm Evolut Comput 9:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur S, Dharavath R, Damodar RE (2020) Spark and rule-KNN based scalable machine learning framework for EEG deceit identification. Biomed Signal Process Control 58:101886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Miao D, Blohm G (2013) A new method for EEG-based concealed information test. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 8(3):520–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpaw JR et al (2000) Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 8(2):164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Dr. Damoder Reddy Edla form NIT Goa and Dr. Anushree Bablani from IIIT Sri City, Andhra Pradesh, for their support.

Funding

This is not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Each author made equal contributions in this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijayasree Boddu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest with others.

Ethics approval

This article did not contain any data collected by conducting human or animal studies.

Consent to participate

This is not applicable.

Consent for publication

This is not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-024-10084-8"

The authors Vijayasree Boddu and Prakash Kodali have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boddu, V., Kodali, P. RETRACTED ARTICLE: PSO-based optimization for EEG data and SVM for efficient deceit identification. Soft Comput 27, 9835–9843 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08476-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08476-3

Keywords

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy