Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Construction site layout planning and safety management using fuzzy-based bee colony optimization model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The construction site layout planning is an activity that establishes the temporary facility location, thereby enhancing the efficiency of the construction. Recently, safety enhancement plays a significant role in construction site layout planning. This paper aims in developing an optimal construction site layout planning by fulfilling three main objectives, namely minimum cost facility, minimum risk of safety facility and minimum noise pollution. In addition to this, this paper also proposes a fuzzy-based bee colony optimization (FBCO) algorithm for tuning ρ and τ parameters so as to obtain a feasible and optimal solution. Also, this FBCO algorithm is employed to solve the construction site layout problem by satisfying the multi-objective function. Then, an FBCO-CLP approach is employed in obtaining a final optimal construction site layout plan. Moreover, the performance analysis of FBCO employs five benchmark functions to examine the effectiveness of the system for numerous aspects. Finally, a case study utilizes a residential building for verifying the proposed approach containing 13 temporary facilities. The experimental result reveals that the proposed FBCO-CSLP approach provides an optimal layout plan with minimum cost, noise pollution and safety risk facilities. Moreover, the comparative analysis is done by comparing the proposed approach with various other approaches such as ANN, GA, PSO, ABC and DE for three different types of facilities, namely cost facility, safety facility risk and noise facility. The experimental analysis reveals that the proposed approach provides better performances when compared with all other approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Jiang W, Zhou Y, Ding L, Zhou C, Ning X (2020) UAV-based 3D reconstruction for hoist site mapping and layout planning in petrochemical construction. Autom Constr 113:103137

    Google Scholar 

  2. Güllü H (2017) A new prediction method to rheological behavior of grout with bottom ash for jet grouting columns. Soils Found 57(3):384–396

    Google Scholar 

  3. Güllü H (2012) Prediction of peak ground acceleration by genetic expression programming and regression A comparison using likelihood based measure. Eng Geol 141142:92–113

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dilip PA, Joshi DA (2013) A review paper on construction site layout planning. Int J Innov Eng Technol IJIET, 2(3)

  5. Jiuping X, Zongmin LI (2012) Multi-objective dynamic construction site layout planning in fuzzy random environment. Autom Constr 27:155–169

    Google Scholar 

  6. Güllü H, Fedakar HI (2017) Response surface methodology for optimization of stabilizer dosage rates of marginal sand stabilized with Sludge Ash and fiber based on UCS performances. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(5):1717–1727

    Google Scholar 

  7. Güllü H (2014) Function finding via genetic expression programming for strength and elastic properties of clay treated with bottom Ash. Eng Appl Artif Intell 35:143–157

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schuldt S, El-Rayes K (2018) Optimizing the planning of remote construction sites to minimize facility destruction from explosive attacks. J Constr Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Song X, Xu J, Shen C, Peña-Mora F, Zeng Z (2017) A decision making system for construction temporary facilities layout planning in large-scale construction projects. Int J Civ Eng, 1–21

  10. Said H, El-Rayes K (2013) Performance of global optimization models for dynamic site layout planning of construction projects. Autom Constr 36(12):71–78

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sanad HM, Ammar MA, Ibrahim M (2008) Optimal construction site layout considering safety and environmental aspects. J Constr Eng Manage 134(7):536–544

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schwabe Kevin, Teizer Jochen, König Markus (2019) Applying rule-based model-checking to construction site layout planning tasks. Autom Constr 97:205–219

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yi Wen, Chi Hung-Lin, Wang Shuaian (2018) Mathematical programming models for construction site layout problems. Autom Constr 85:241–248

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sundararaj V (2019) Optimal task assignment in mobile cloud computing by queue based ant-bee algorithm. Wirel Pers Commun 104(1):173–197

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vinu S, Muthukumar S, Kumar RS (2018) An optimal cluster formation based energy efficient dynamic scheduling hybrid MAC protocol for heavy traffic load in wireless sensor networks. Comput Secur 77:277–288

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sundararaj Vinu (2016) An efficient threshold prediction scheme for wavelet based ECG signal noise reduction using variable step size firefly algorithm. Int J Intell Eng Syst 9(3):117–126

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sundararaj V (2019) Optimised denoising scheme via opposition-based self-adaptive learning PSO algorithm for wavelet-based ECG signal noise reduction. Int J Biomed Eng Technol 31(4):325

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sundararaj V, Anoop V, Dixit P, Arjaria A, Chourasia U, Bhambri P, Rejeesh MR, Sundararaj R (2020) CCGPA‐MPPT: Cauchy preferential crossover‐based global pollination algorithm for MPPT in photovoltaic system. Prog Photovolt Res Appl

  19. Lam KC, Ning X, Lam MCK (2009) Conjoining MMAS to GA to solve construction site layout planning problem. J Constr Eng Manag 135(10):1049–1057

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rejeesh MR (2019) Interest point based face recognition using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system. Multimed Tools Appl 78(16):22691–22710

    Google Scholar 

  21. Güllü H (2017) A novel approach to prediction of rheological characteristics of jet grout cement mixtures via genetic expression programming. Neural Comput Appl 28:407–420

    Google Scholar 

  22. Güllü Hamza (2013) On the prediction of shear wave velocity at local site of strong ground motion stations: an application using artificial intelligence. Bull Earthq Eng 11(4):969–997

    Google Scholar 

  23. Güllü H, Fedakar HI (2017) On the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of silty soil stabilized with bottom ash, jute and steel fibers via artificial intelligence. Geomech Eng 12(3):441–464

    Google Scholar 

  24. Güllü H, Ercelebi E (2007) A neural network approach for attenuation relationships: an application using strong ground motion data from Turkey. Eng Geol 93(3–4):65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gunduz M, Khader BK (2020) Construction project safety performance management using analytic network process (ANP) as a Multi-criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Tool. Comput Intell Neurosci 2020:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  26. Benjaoran V, Peansupap V (2019) Grid-based construction site layout planning with particle swarm optimisation and travel path distance. Constr Manag Econ. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1600708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hammad AWA (2019) A multi-objective construction site layout planning problem solved through integration of location and traffic assignment models. Constr Manag Econ. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1659510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Le PL, Dao TM, Chaabane A (2019) BIM-based framework for temporary facility layout planning in construction site. Constr Innov 19(3):424–464

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xu Jiuping, Zhao Siwei, Li Zongmin, Zeng Ziqiang (2016) Bilevel construction site layout optimization based on hazardous-material transportation. J Infrastr Syst 22(3):04016014

    Google Scholar 

  30. Elbeltagi E, Hegazy T (2001) A Hybrid AL-based system for site layout planning in construction. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastr Eng 16(2):79–93

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ning X, Qi J, Wu C, Wang W (2019) Reducing noise pollution by planning construction site layout via a multi-objective optimization model. J Cleaner Product 222:218–230

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kaveh A, Rastegar Moghaddam M (2018) A hybrid WOA-CBO algorithm for construction site layout planning problem. Scientia Iranica 25(3):1094–1104

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vakili R, Akbarpour Shirazi M, Gitinavard H (2020) Multi-echelon green open-location-routing problem: A robust-based stochastic optimization approach. Scientia Iranica. https://doi.org/10.24200/SCI.2020.52149.2564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gitinavard H, Akbarpour Shirazi M (2018) An extended intuitionistic fuzzy modified group complex proportional assessment approach. J Ind Syst Eng 11(3):229–246

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gitinavard H, Akbarpour Shirazi M, Ghodsypour SH (2019) A bi-objective multi-echelon supply chain model with Pareto optimal points evaluation for perishable products under uncertainty. Scientiairanica 26(5):2952–2970

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gitinavard H, Zarandi MHF (2016) A mixed expert evaluation system and dynamic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy selection approach. Int J Math Comput Phys Electr Comput Eng 10:337–345

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sohrabvandi S, Gitinavard H, Ebrahimnezhad S (2017) A new extended analytical hierarchy process technique with incomplete interval-valued information for risk assessment in IT outsourcing. Int J Eng 30(5):739–748

    Google Scholar 

  38. Goli A, Zare HK, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Sadeghieh (2019) Hybrid artificial intelligence and robust optimization for a multi-objective product portfolio problem case study: the dairy products industry. Comput Ind Eng 137:106090

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Goli A, Zare HK, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Sadegheih (2020) Multiobjective fuzzy mathematical model for a financially constrained closed-loop supply chain with labor employment. Comput Intell 36(1):4–34

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sangaiah AK, Tirkolaee EB, Goli A, Dehnavi-Arani S (2020) Robust optimization and mixed-integer linear programming model for LNG supply chain planning problem. Soft Comput 24(11):7885–7905

    Google Scholar 

  41. Goli A, Babaee Tirkolaee E, Soltani M (2019) A robust just-in-time flow shop scheduling problem with outsourcing option on subcontractors. Product Manuf Res 7(1):294–315

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mostafaeipour A, Goli A, Qolipour M (2018) Prediction of air travel demand using a hybrid artificial neural network (ANN) with Bat and Firefly algorithms: a case study. J Supercomput 74(10):5461–5484

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ning X, Lamb KC, Lam MCK (2010) Dynamic construction site layout planning using max–min ant system. Autom Constr 19(1):55–65

    Google Scholar 

  44. Andayesh M, Sadeghpour F (2014) A comparative study of different approaches for finding the shortest path on construction sites. Creat Constr Conf 85:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  45. Teo ALE, Ofori G, Tjandra IK, Kim H (2016) Design for safety: theoretical frame work of the safety aspect of BIM system to determine the safety index. Constr Econ Build 16(4):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fogarty GJ, Murphy PJ, Perera HN (2017) Safety climate in defence explosive ordnance: survey development and model testing. Saf Sci 93:62–69

    Google Scholar 

  47. El-Rayes K, Khalafallah A (2005) Trade-off between safety and cost in planning construction site layouts. J Constr Eng Manag 131(11):1186–1195

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ning X, Qi JY, Wu CL (2018) A quantitative safety risk assessment model for construction site layout planning. Saf Sci 104:246e259

    Google Scholar 

  49. Li XD, Song ZY, Wang T, Zheng Y, Ning X (2016) Health impacts of construction noise on workers: a quantitative assessment model based on exposure measurement. J Clean Prod 135:721e731

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lam KC, Ning X, Ng T (2007) The application of the ant colony optimization algorithm to the construction site layout planning problem. Constr Manag Econ 25(4):359–374

    Google Scholar 

  51. Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization, Technical Report TR06, Erciyes University Press, Erciyes

  52. Karaboga D, Akay B, Ozturk C (2007) Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) optimization algorithm for training feed-forward neural networks. Springer, Berlin, pp 318–329

    Google Scholar 

  53. Li Z, Xu C (2009) Adaptive fuzzy logic control of dynamic balance and motion for wheeled inverted pendulums. Fuzzy Sets Syst 160(12):1787–1803

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Wong LP, Low MYH, Chong CS (2008) Bee Colony Optimization with local search for traveling salesman problem. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, pp 1019–1025

  55. Karaboga D, Basturk B (2008) On the performance of Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 8(2):687–697

    Google Scholar 

  56. Choong SS, Wong L-P, Lim CP (2018) A dynamic fuzzy-based dance mechanism for the Bee Colony Optimization algorithm. Comput Intell 34(4):999–1024

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. Nobile Marco S, Cazzaniga Paolo, Besozzi Daniela, Colombo Riccardo, Mauri Giancarlo, Pasi Gabriella (2018) Fuzzy Self-Tuning PSO: a settings-free algorithm for global optimization. Swarm and evolutionary computation 39:70–85

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hong T, Ji C, Park J, Leigh SB, Seo DY (2015) Prediction of environmental costs of construction noise and vibration at the preconstruction Phase. J Manag Eng 31(5):04014079

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hammad AWA, Akbarnezhad A, Rey D (2016) A multi-objective mixed integer nonlinear programming model for construction site layout planning to minimize noise pollution and transport costs. Autom Constr 61:73e85

    Google Scholar 

  60. Huang C, Wong CK (2016) Discretized cell modeling for optimal facility layout plans of unequal and irregular facilities. J Constr Eng Manag 143(1):04016082

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rahman MM, Bobadilla L, Mostafavi A, Carmenate T, Zanlongo SA (2016) An automated methodology for worker path generation and safety assessment in construction projects. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 15(2):479–491

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Project Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Phong Thanh Nguyen

Authors
  1. Phong Thanh Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phong Thanh Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, P.T. Construction site layout planning and safety management using fuzzy-based bee colony optimization model. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 5821–5842 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05361-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05361-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy