Abstract
Research on context-dependent memory has addressed many external and internal types of contexts. However, whether the physical activity engaged in at the time of encoding and recall can act as an environmental context cue has been systematically investigated only in one study. The purpose of the present study was to replicate this; furthermore, given the effect of physical activity/effort on the way space is represented, we sought to extend the findings to object location memory. Using a 1-list paradigm (Experiment 1) and a 2-list paradigm (Experiment 2), participants had to learn the locations of objects on a grid and then recall them, while standing or walking on a health walker. No evidence of activity context effects was found. However, an interference effect of the motor task on location memory was detected, such that participants’ performance was worse when walking, compared to standing, at encoding (Experiment 2) or recall (Experiment 1). Results are discussed based on the outshining hypothesis and the possible link between motor task and object location memory.





Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abernethy EM (1940) The effect of changed environmental conditions upon the results of college examinations. J Psychol 10:293–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1940.9917005
Anderson MJ, Berry C, Morse D, Diotte M (2005) Flavor as context: altered flavor cues disrupt memory accuracy. J Behav Neurosci Res 3:1–5. http://academic2.strose.edu/Math_And_Science/flintr/jbnr/Anderson%20Final.PDF
Baker JR, Bezance JB, Zellaby E, Aggleton JP (2004) Chewing gum can produce context-dependent effects upon memory. Appetite 43(42):207–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.06.004
Bartlett JC, Santrock JW (1979) Affect-dependent episodic memory in young children. Child Dev 50(2):513–518. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129430
Bhalla M, Proffitt DR (1999) Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1076–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1076
Bjork RA, Richardson-Klavehn A (1989) On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In: Izawa C (ed) Current issues in cognitive processes: the Tulane Flowerree symposium on cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, pp 313–344
Bourdin C, Teasdale N, Nougier V (1998) Attentional demands and the organization of reaching movements in rock climbing. Res Q Exerc Sport 69:406–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1998.10607715
Buschke H, Lenon R (1969) Encoding homophones and synonyms for verbal discrimination and recognition. Psychon Sci 14(6):269–270. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329117
Clark MS, Milberg S, Ross J (1983) Arousal cues arousal-related material in memory: implications for understanding effects of mood on memory. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 22(6):633–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90375-4
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Cohen R, Baldwin LM, Sherman RC (1978) Cognitive maps of a naturalistic setting. Child Dev 49:1216–1218. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128763
Darling KA, Helton WS (2014) Dual-task interference between climbing and a simulated communication task. Exp Brain Res 232:1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3855-7
Eich JE (1980) The cue-dependent nature of state dependent retrieval. Mem Cogn 8(2):157–173. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213419
Eich JE (1985) Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery. Exp Psychol 11(4):764–770. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.764
Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A (1996) GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 28(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03203630
Falkenberg PR (1972) Recall improves in short-term memory the more recall context resembles learning context. J Exp Psychol 95:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033287
Gage WH, Sleik RJ, Polych MA, McKenzie NC, Brown LA (2003) The allocation of attention during locomotion is altered by anxiety. Exp Brain Res 150:107–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-00301468-7
Godden DR, Baddeley A (1975) Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. Br J Psychol 66(3):325–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01468.x
Green AL, Helton WS (2011) Dual-task performance during a climbing traverse. Exp Brain Res 215:307–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2898-2
Jensen LC, Harris K, Anderson CD (1971) Retention following a change in ambient contextual stimuli for six age groups. Dev Psychol 4(3):394–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030957
Johnson AJ, Miles C (2008) Chewing gum and context-dependent memory: the independent roles of chewing gum and mint flavour. Br J Psychol 99(2):293–306. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X228474
Lambourne K, Tomporowski P (2010) The effect of exercise-induced arousal on cognitive task performance: a meta-regression analysis. Brain Res 1341:12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.091
Lang AJ, Craske MG, Brown M, Ghaneian A (2001) Fear-related state dependent memory. Cogn Emot 15(5):695–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930125811
Light L, Carter-Sobell L (1970) Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80002-0
Metzger RL, Boschee PF, Haugen T, Schnobrich BL (1979) The classroom as learning context: changing rooms affects performance. Educ Psychol 71(4):440–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.4.440
Miles C, Hardman E (1998) State-dependent memory produced by aerobic exercise. Ergonomics 41(1):20–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401398187297
Miles C, Johnson AJ (2007) Chewing gum and context-dependent memory effects: a re-examination. Appetite 48(2):154–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.07.082
Miles C, Charig R, Eva H (2008) Chewing gum as context: effects in long-term memory. J Behav Neurosci Res 6(Fall):1–5. http://academic2.strose.edu/Math_And_Science/flintr/jbnr/documents/MilesFinalProof_002.pdf
Okabe A, Aoki K, Hamamoto W (1986) Distance and direction judgement in a large scale natural environment: effects of a slope and winding trail. Environ Behav 18:755–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916586186004
Pan S (1926) The influence of context upon learning and recall. J Exp Psychol Gen 9(6):468–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073472
Proffitt DR, Stefanucci J, Banton T, Epstein W (2003) The role of effort in perceiving distance. Assoc Psychol Sci 14(2):106–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01427
Rickman S, Johnson A, Miles C (2013) The impact of chewing gum resistance on immediate free recall. Br J Psychol 104(3):339–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02124.x
Rieser JJ, Pick HL, Ashmead DH, Garing AE (1995) Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:480–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.480
Rutherford A (2000) The ability of familiarity, disruption, and the relative strength of nonenvironmental context cues to explain unreliable environmental-context-dependent memory effects in free recall. Mem Cogn 28(8):1419–1428
Rutherford A (2004) Environmental context-dependent recognition memory effect: an examination of ICE model and cue-overload hypotheses. Q J Exp Psychol 57A:107–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000152
Schab FR (1990) Odors and the remembrance of things past. J Exp Psychol 16(4):648–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.648
Schramke CJ, Bauer RM (1997) State-dependent learning in older and younger adults. Psychol Aging 12(2):255–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.255
Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M, Kerns KA, Baldwin M (1997) The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 52(4):232–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/52A.4.M232
Silverman I, Eals M (1992) Sex differences in spatial abilities: evolutionary theory and data. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 487–503
Smith SM (1979) Remembering in and out of context. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 5(5):460–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.5.460
Smith SM (1985) Background music and context-dependent memory. Am J Psychol 98(4):591–603. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422512
Smith SM (1988) Environmental context-dependent memory. In: Davies GM, Thomson DM (eds) Memory in context: context in memory. Wiley, New York, pp 13–34
Smith SM (1994) Theoretical principles of context-dependent memory. In: Morris P, Gruneberg M (eds) Theoretical aspects of memory (aspects of memory), vol 2, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York, pp 158–195
Smith SM (2013) Chapter 10: Effects of environmental context on human memory. In: Perfect TJ, Lindsay DS (eds) The SAGE handbook of applied memory. Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 162–182
Smith SM, Manzano I (2010) Video context-dependent recall. Behav Res Methods 42(1):292–301. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.292
Smith SM, Vela E (1992) Environmental context-dependent eyewitness recognition. Appl Cogn Psychol 6(2):125–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350060204
Smith SM, Vela E (2001) Environmental context-dependent memory: a review and meta-analysis. Psychon Bull Rev 8(2):203–220. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196157
Smith SM, Glenberg A, Bjork RA (1978) Environmental context and human memory. Mem Cogn 6(4):342–353. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197465
Sparrow WA, Bradshaw EJ, Lamoureux E, Tirosh O (2002) Ageing effects on the attention demands of walking. Hum Mov Sci 21:961–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(02)00154-9
Stephens R, Tunney RJ (2004) Role of glucose in chewing gum-related facilitation of cognitive function. Appetite 43(2):211–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.07.006
Van Der Wege M, Barry LA (2008) Potential perils of changing environmental context on examination scores. Coll Teach 56(3):173–176. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.56.3.173-176
Watson JB (1907) Kinæsthetic and organic sensations: their role in the reactions of the white rat to the maze. Review Publishing Company, Lancaster
Wilson M (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 9(4):625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
Witt JK, Proffitt DR, Epstein W (2010) When and how are spatial perceptions scaled? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36(5):1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019947
Woodham A, Billinghurst M, Helton WS (2016) Climbing with a head-mounted display: dual-task costs. Hum Factors 53(3):452–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872081562343
Yogev-Seligmann G, Rotern-Galili YR, Mirelman A, Dickstein R, Giladi N, Haudorff JM (2010) How does explicit prioritization alter walking during dual-task performance? Effects of age and sex on gait speed and variability. Phys Ther 90(2):177–186. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090043
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hammond, A.G., Murphy, E.M., Silverman, B.M. et al. No environmental context-dependent effect, but interference, of physical activity on object location memory. Cogn Process 20, 31–43 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0875-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0875-4