Abstract
While making location decisions, the distribution of distances (outcomes) among the service recipients (clients) is an important issue. In order to comply with the minimization of distances as well as with an equal consideration of the clients, mean-equity approaches are commonly used. They quantify the problem in a lucid form of two criteria: the mean outcome representing the overall efficiency and a scalar measure of inequality of outcomes to represent the equity (fairness) aspects. The mean-equity model is appealing to decision makers and allows a simple trade-off analysis. On the other hand, for typical dispersion indices used as inequality measures, the mean-equity approach may lead to inferior conclusions with respect to the distances minimization. Some inequality measures, however, can be combined with the mean itself into optimization criteria that remain in harmony with both inequality minimization and minimization of distances. In this paper we introduce general conditions for inequality measures sufficient to provide such an equitable consistency. We verify the conditions for the basic inequality measures thus showing how they can be used in location models not leading to inferior distributions of distances.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abernathy, W. J., & Hershey, J. C. (1972). A spatial-allocation model for regional health-services planning. Operations Research, 20, 629–642.
Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244–263.
Benito Alonso, M. A., & Devaux, P. (1981). Location and size of day nurseries. European Journal of Operational Research, 6, 195–198.
Berman, O. (1990). Mean-variance location problems. Transportation Science, 24, 287–293.
Berman, O., & Kaplan, E. H. (1990). Equity maximizing facility location schemes. Transportation Science, 24, 137–144.
Carrizosa, E. (1999). Minimizing the variance of euclidean distances. Studies in Locational Analysis, 12, 101–118.
Coulter, P. B. (1980). Measuring the inequality of urban public services: a methodological discussion with applications. Policy Studies Journal, 8, 693–698.
Current, J., Min, H., & Schilling, D. (1990). Multiobjective analysis of facility location decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 49, 295–307.
Erkut, E. (1993). Inequality measures for location problems. Location Science, 1, 199–217.
Francis, R. L., McGinnis, L. F., & White, J. A. (1992). Facility layout and location: an analytical approach. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E., & Pólya, G. (1934). Inequalities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hay, A. M. (1995). Concepts of equity, fairness and justice in geographical studies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographer, 20, 500–508.
Kostreva, M. M., & Ogryczak, W. (1999a). Equitable approaches to location problems. In J.-C. Thill (Ed.), Spatial multicriteria decision making and analysis: a geographic information sciences approach (pp. 103–126). Brookfield: Ashgate.
Kostreva, M. M., & Ogryczak, W. (1999b). Linear optimization with multiple equitable criteria. RAIRO Recherche Opérationnelle, 33, 275–297.
Kostreva, M. M., Ogryczak, W., & Wierzbicki, A. (2004). Equitable aggregations and multiple criteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 362–377.
Labbé, M., Peeters, D., & Thisse, J.-F. (1996). Location on networks. In M. O. Ball, T. L. Magnanti, C. L. Monma & G. L. Nemhauser (Eds.), Handbook in operations research and management science: network routing (pp. 551–624). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
López-de-los-Mozos, M. C., & Mesa, J. A. (2001). The maximum absolute deviation measure in location problems on networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 135, 184–194.
López-de-los-Mozos, M. C., & Mesa, J. A. (2003). The sum of absolute differences on a network: algorithm and comparison with other equality measures. INFOR, 41, 195–210.
Love, R. F., Morris, J. G., & Wesolowsky, G. O. (1988). Facilities location: models & methods. New York: North-Holland.
Maimon, O. (1986). The variance equity measure in locational decision theory. Annals of Operations Research, 6, 147–160.
Maimon, O. (1988). An algorithm for the Lorenz measure in locational decisions on trees. Journal of Algorithms, 9, 583–596.
Malczewski, J. (2000). Multicriteria spatial allocation of educational resources: an overview. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34, 219–235.
Malczewski, J., & Ogryczak, W. (1988). A multiobjective approach to reorganization of health service areas: a case study. Environment and Planning A, 20, 1461–1470.
Malczewski, J., & Ogryczak, W. (1990). An interactive approach to the central facility location problem: locating pediatric hospitals in Warsaw. Geographical Analysis, 22, 244–258.
Mandell, M. B. (1991). Modelling effectiveness-equity trade-offs in public service delivery systems. Management Science, 37, 467–482.
Marsh, M. T., & Schilling, D. A. (1994). Equity measurement in facility location analysis: a review and framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 74, 1–17.
Marshall, A. W., & Olkin, I. (1979). Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. New York: Academic Press.
Mayhew, L. D., & Leonardi, G. (1982). Equity, efficiency, and accessibility in urban and regional health-care systems. Environment and Planning A, 14, 1479–1507.
Mirchandani, P. B., & Francis, R. L. (1990). Discrete location theory. New York: Wiley.
Morrill, R. L., & Symons, J. (1977). Efficiency and equity aspects of optimum location. Geographical Analysis, 9, 215–225.
Mueller, A., & Stoyan, D. (2002). Comparison methods for stochastic models and risks. New York: Wiley.
Mulligan, G. F. (1991). Equity measures and facility location. Papers in Regional Science, 70, 345–365.
Nickel, S., & Puerto, J. (2005). Location theory: a unified approach. Berlin: Springer.
O’Brien, R. J. (1969). Model for planning the location and size of urban schools. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2, 141–153.
Ogryczak, W. (1997a). On the lexicographic minimax approach to location problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 100, 566–585.
Ogryczak, W. (1997b). Linear and discrete optimization with multiple criteria: preference models and applications to decision support. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press (in Polish)
Ogryczak, W. (1999). On the distribution approach to location problems. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 37, 595–612.
Ogryczak, W. (2000). Inequality measures and equitable approaches to location problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 122, 374–391.
Ogryczak, W., & Ruszczyński, A. (2002). Dual stochastic dominance and related mean-risk models. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 13, 60–78.
Ogryczak, W., & Tamir, A. (2003). Minimizing the sum of the k largest functions in linear time. Information Processing Letters, 85, 117–122.
Ogryczak, W., & Zawadzki, M. (2002). Conditional median: a parametric solution concept for location problems. Annals of Operations Research, 110, 167–181.
Pióro, M., & Medhi, D. (2004). Routing, flow and capacity design in communication and computer networks. San Francisco: Kaufmann.
Rockafellar, R. T. (1970). Convex analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sen, A. (1973). On economic inequality. Oxford: Clarendon.
Tsou, K.-W., Hung, Y.-T., & Chang, Y.-L. (2005). An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, 22, 424–435.
Vincke, P. (1992). Multicriteria decision-aid. New York: Wiley.
Young, H. P. (1994). Equity in theory and practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies under grant 3T11C 005 27 “Models and Algorithms for Efficient and Fair Resource Allocation in Complex Systems”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ogryczak, W. Inequality measures and equitable locations. Ann Oper Res 167, 61–86 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0234-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0234-9