Abstract
As the importance of online collaborative writing is recognized as an effective teaching strategy, studies have investigated how factors such as gender, ability, and group size affect learners’ collaboration. However, few studies have explored the effects of group formation, i.e., student-chosen groups (SCGs) and teacher-assigned groups (TAGs) in online co-writing. Using the framework of the Toulmin model of argumentative writing, the current study investigated whether SCGs and TAGs differ regarding collaborative approaches and characteristics in co-argumentative writing using an online writing platform (i.e., Shimo). Seventeen fourth-year English majors participated in this 2-week study, nine of whom formed into three three-person SCGs, while a teacher assigned the remaining participants into two three-person TAGs and one two-person TAG. The archived discussion notes in Shimo along with semi-structured interviews comprised the data for analysis. The findings revealed that TAGs and SCGs had different collaborative approaches. TAGs were identified as less active, while SCGs tended to collaborate better in the co-writing processes. Implications for online classroom applications and future research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Anderson, T. (2004). Teaching in an online learning context. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 273–294). Athabasca University.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J., & Guetterman, T. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
Fan, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2021). A scaffolding tool to assist learners in argumentative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1–2), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1660685
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.
Hassaskhah, J., & Mozaffari, H. (2015). The impact of group formation method (student-selected vs. teacher-assigned) on group dynamics and group outcome in EFL creative writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(1), 147.
Hilton, S., & Phillips, F. (2010). Instructor-assigned and student-selected groups: A view from inside. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2010.25.1.15
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2009). Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.010
Jiang, D., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Collaborating with ‘familiar’ strangers in mobile-assisted environments: The effect of socializing activities on learning EFL writing. Computers & Education, 150, 103841.
Lai, C., Lei, C., & Liu, Y. (2016). The nature of collaboration and perceived learning in wiki-based collaborative writing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2586.
Lam, Y. W., Hew, K. F., & Chiu, K. F. (2018). Improving argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.125/44583
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2020). Worked example or scripting Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.631142
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Explaining dynamic interactions in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 1–26.
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Good or bad collaborative wild writing: Exploring links between group interactions and writing products. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.003
Li, M. M. (2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: An analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 882–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1465981
Mitchell, S. N., Reilly, R. C., Bramwell, G., Slonosky, A., & Lilly, F. R. (2004). Friendship and choosing groupmates: Preferences for teacher-selected versus student selected groupings. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 20–32.
Mozaffari, S. H. (2017). Comparing student-selected and teacher-assigned pairs on collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research, 21(4), 496–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816641703
Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Bayat, A., van Ginkel, S., Biemans, H. J., & Mulder, M. (2020). Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: Does gender matter? Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200
Odo, C., Masthoff, J., & Beacham, N. (2019). Group formation for collaborative learning. In International conference on artificial intelligence in education, Chichago. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_39
Qin, J. (2013). Applying toulmin model in teaching L2 argumentative writing. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 21–29.
Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38(3), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012
Qiu, X., & Lee, M. K. (2020). Regulated learning and self-efficacy beliefs in peer collaborative writing: An exploratory study of L2 learners’ written products, task discussions, and self-reports. System, 93, 102312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102312
Rajaguru, R., Narendran, R., & Rajesh, G. (2020). Social loafing in group-based learning: Student-created and instructor-created group perspectives. Education + Training, 62(4), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2019-0018
Sadeghi, H., & Kardan, A. A. (2016). Toward effective group formation in computer-supported collaborative learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.851090
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179
Su, F., & Zou, D. (2020). Technology-enhanced collaborative language learning: theoretical foundations, technologies, and implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1754–1788. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1831545
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning. Macmillan.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yang, R. (2022). An empirical study of claims and qualifiers in ESL students’ argumentative writing based on toulmin model. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00133-w
Zhang, M. (2019). Towards a quantitative model of understanding the dynamics of collaboration in collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.04.001
Zioga, C., & Bikos, K. (2020). Collaborative writing using Google Docs in Primary Education: Development of argumentative discourse. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.690372
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Su, F., Zou, D. & Xie, H. Integrating Different Group Patterns into Collaborative Argumentative Writing in the Shimo Platform. Tech Know Learn 29, 309–330 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09632-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09632-8