Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating the Use of Immersive Interactive Mixed Reality (I2MR) Technology in Special Needs Education in Singapore

  • Original research
  • Published:
Technology, Knowledge and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of immersive interactive mixed reality (I2MR) technologies has been of interest to educators due to the rapid advancement of technology, lowered cost, and increased engagement of the senses. This is particularly attractive in special needs education (SNE) as it can provide a safe space in which students can learn and practice skills needed in the real world. 86 students with diagnosed cognitive disabilities (aged 7–18) and 10 teachers from three schools in Singapore participated in the study. The I2MR was added to the school curriculum for 4–8 months, depending on the school. The efficacy and practicality of I2MR intervention were assessed with qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys being analysed through statistical modelling. We showed improvement in students’ mental well-being, academic and social skills as well as a positive effect on teachers’ work satisfaction and sense of teacher efficacy. Based on the teachers’ feedback, I2MR was helpful for SNE because of its engaging environment, interactive and playful nature leading to higher involvement, facilitation of social skills, calming and relaxation effect, and “sandbox” mode for skills to be practised in a safe space. The I2MR limitations included overstimulation effects on certain students. Also, some activities can be performed more effectively using other tools. Overall, we present data that shows benefits and highlights the practicality of I2MR in SNE and make the argument for their further usage and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

Raw data underlying the statistics and figures of this study are available on request from the authors. Requests for data access should be directed to the corresponding authors. All data will be anonymized due to confidentiality.

References

  • Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17(2), 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baragash, R. S., Al-Samarraie, H., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alfarraj, O. (2020). Augmented reality in special education: A meta-analysis of single-subject design studies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(3), 382–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, B. S. (2004). Promoting teacher quality and retention in special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(5), 370–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutsika, E. (2014). Kinect in education: A proposal for children with autism. Procedia Computer Science, 27(January), 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brännlund, A., Strandh, M., & Nilsson, K. (2017). Mental-Health and educational achievement: The link between poor mental-health and upper secondary school completion and grades. Journal of Mental Health, 26(4), 318–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, L., Brunner, M., & Hemsley, B. (2020). A review of virtual reality technologies in the field of communication disability: Implications for practice and research. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 15(4), 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadime, I., Pinto, A. M., Lima, S., Rego, S., Pereira, J., & Ribeiro, I. (2016). Well-being and academic achievement in secondary school pupils: The unique effects of burnout and engagement. Journal of Adolescence, 53(December), 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, S. V. G. (2007). Virtual environments supporting learning and communication in special needs education. Topics in Language Disorders, 27(3), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fat, Ng., Linda, S. S., Boniface, S., Mindell, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2017). Evaluating and establishing national norms for mental wellbeing using the short Warwick–Edinburgh mental well-being scale (SWEMWBS): Findings from the health survey for England. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 26(5), 1129–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frostad, P., & Pijl, S. J. (2007). Does being friendly help in making friends? The relation between the social position and social skills of pupils with special needs in mainstream education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geretsegger, M., Elefant, C., Mössler, K. A., & Gold, C. (2014). Music therapy for people with autism spectrum disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004381.pub3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ip, H. H. S., Wong, S. W. L., Chan, D. F. Y., Byrne, J., Li, C., Yuan, V. S. N., Lau, K. S. Y., & Wong, J. Y. W. (2018). Enhance emotional and social adaptation skills for children with autism spectrum disorder: A virtual reality enabled approach. Computers and Education, 117, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Y.-S., Chang, Y.-J., & Howell, S. R. (2021). Using a Kinect-based game to teach oral hygiene in four elementary students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: JARID, 34(2), 606–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karami, B., Koushki, R., Arabgol, F., Rahmani, M., & Vahabie, A.-H. (2021). Effectiveness of virtual/augmented reality-based therapeutic interventions on individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.665326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1996). Social skill deficits and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(3), 226–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourakli, M., Altanis, I., Retalis, S., Boloudakis, M., Zbainos, D., & Antonopoulou, K. (2017). Towards the improvement of the cognitive, motoric and academic skills of students with special educational needs using kinect learning games. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 11(January), 28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krokos, E., Plaisant, C., & Varshney, A. (2019). Virtual memory palaces: immersion aids recall. Virtual Reality, 23(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). LmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, S.-O. (2011). A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-point Likert scales. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(4), 412–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, A., Chan, S., Cai, Y., Huang, L., Nay, Z. T., & Goei, S. L. (2018). Learning through VR gaming with virtual pink dolphins for children with ASD. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(6), 718–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, S. A., & Simpson, C. G. (2010). Social skills: Laying the foundation for success. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 38(2), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzano-León, A., Camacho-Lazarraga, P., Guerrero, M. A., Guerrero-Puerta, L., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Trigueros, R., & Alias, A. (2021). Between level up and game over: A systematic literature review of gamification in education. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 13(4), 2247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mateu, J., Lasala, M. J., & Alamán, X. (2014). VirtualTouch: A tool for developing mixed reality educational applications and an example of use for inclusive education. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(10), 815–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesa-Gresa, P., Gil-Gómez, H., Lozano-Quilis, J.-A., & Gil-Gómez, J.-A. (2018). Effectiveness of virtual reality for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: An evidence-based systematic review. Sensors, 18(8), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, M., Ridout, B., & Campbell, A. (2020). A scoping review identifying the need for quality research on the use of virtual reality in workplace settings for stress management. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 23(8), 506–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavri, S., & Hegwer-DiVita, M. (2006). Meeting the social and emotional needs of students with disabilities: The special educators’ perspective. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 22(2), 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintero, J., Baldiris, S., Rubira, R., Cerón, J., & Velez, G. (2019). Augmented reality in educational inclusion. A systematic review on the last decade. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(August), 1835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers and Education, 147(103778), 103778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rights, J. D., & Sterba, S. K. (2019). quantifying explained variance in multilevel models: An integrative framework for defining R-squared measures. Psychological Methods, 24(3), 309–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L. (1979). Implicit and explicit memory models. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13(6), 339–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roussou, M., Oliver, M., & Slater, M. (2006). The virtual playground: An educational virtual reality environment for evaluating interactivity and conceptual learning. Virtual Reality, 10(3), 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzman, M. C., Chris Dede, R., Loftin, B., & Chen, J. (1999). A model for understanding how virtual reality aids complex conceptual learning. Presence, 8(3), 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, S. H. (2003). Social skills training with children and young people: Theory, evidence and practice. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 8(2), 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standen, P. J., & Brown, D. J. (2005). Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of people with intellectual disabilities: Review. Cyberpsychology and Behavior: the Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 8(3), 272–282. discussion 283–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton-Chapman, T. L., Walker, V., & Jamison, K. R. (2014). Building social competence in preschool: The effects of a social skills intervention targeting children enrolled in head start. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(2), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., & Wang, M. C. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S. (2009). Internal construct validity of the Warwick–Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish health education population survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7(1), 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Q. P., Huang, L., Di, Xu., Cen, Y., & Cao, Qi. (2022). Serious game for VR road crossing in special needs education. Electronics, 11(16), 2568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, M., Youssef, G. J., McGillivray, J., Clark, T.-J., McMillan, L., & McCarthy, M. C. (2020). Exploring the use of immersive virtual reality to enhance psychological well-being in pediatric oncology: A pilot randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., Parkinson, J., Secker, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(1), 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S., Parsons, S., Westbury, A., White, K., White, K., & Bailey, A. (2010). Sense of presence and atypical social judgments in immersive virtual environments. Responses of adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Autism: the International Journal of Research and Practice, 14(3), 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zawacki-Richter, O., & Latchem, C. (2018). Exploring four decades of research in computers & education. Computers and Education, 122(July), 136–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alper, M., Hourcade, J. P., & Gilutz, S. (2012). Interactive technologies for children with special needs. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on interaction design and children—IDC ’12. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2307096.2307169.

  • Cromby, J. J., Standen, P. J., & Newman, J. (1996). Successful transfer to the real world of skills practised in a virtual environment by students with severe learning difficulties. for Disability, Virtual …. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/PM_Sharkey/publication/260854455_Proceedings_of_the_1st_European_Conference_on_Disability_Virtual_Reality_and_Associated_Technologies_ECDVRAT_1996/links/00b7d532833de149ff000000.pdf#page=115

  • Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D. J., & DeFanti, T. A. (1993). Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: The design and implementation of the CAVE. In Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (pp. 135–1442). SIGGRAPH ’93. Association for Computing Machinery.

  • Dede, C., Salzman, M. C., & Bowen Loftin, R. (1996). ScienceSpace: Virtual realities for learning complex and abstract scientific concepts. In Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 virtual reality annual international symposium. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/vrais.1996.490534.

  • Freina, L. & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280566372_A_Literature_Review_on_Immersive_Virtual_Reality_in_Education_State_Of_The_Art_and_Perspectives

  • Garzotto, F., Gelsomini, M., Occhiuto, D., Matarazzo, V., & Messina, N. (2017). Wearable immersive virtual reality for children with disability: A case study. In Proceedings of the 2017 conference on interaction design and children (pp. 478–483). IDC ’17. Association for Computing Machinery.

  • Greulich-Smith, T. (2017). Measuring the social impact of disability support. March 22, 2017. https://www.iss.nus.edu.sg/community/newsroom/news-detail/2017/03/22/measuring-the-social-impact-of-disability-support

  • Halabi, E.-S. & Alja’am. (n.d.). Design of immersive virtual reality system to improve communication skills in individuals with autism. Journal of Emerging and Rare Diseases. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Osama-Halabi/publication/316056893_Immersive_Virtual_Reality_in_Improving_Communication_Skills_in_Children_with_Autism/links/601925dc45851517ef32131d/Immersive-Virtual-Reality-in-Improving-Communication-Skills-in-Children-with-Autism.pdf

  • Howieson, J. (2011). ADR education: Creating engagement and increasing mental well-being through an interactive and constructive approach. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2503268

  • Johnson, A. (2006). VR as instructional technology: The CAVE as classroom. Configuring history: Teaching the Harlem renaissance through virtual reality cityscapes. Retrieved November 12, 2008.

  • Knauff, M. (2013) Space to reason: A spatial theory of human thought. MIT Press.

  • Matsentidou, S., & Poullis, C. (2014). Immersive visualizations in a VR cave environment for the training and enhancement of social skills for children with autism. In 2014 international conference on computer vision theory and applications (VISAPP) (Vol. 3, pp 230–36).

  • Mendozzi, L., Pugnetti, L., Barbieri, E., Attree, E., Rose, F., Moro, W., Loconte, A., et al. (2000). VIRT—factory trainer project. A generic productive process to train persons with disabilities. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0fbcbb65d2449d7fda02a2727e472399cee4402

  • O’Brien, M. G., Levy, R., & Orich, A. (2009). Virtual immersion: The role of CAVE and PC technology. Calico Journal. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/calicojournal.26.2.337.pdf.

  • Rose, F., Brooks, B. M., & Attree, E. (2000). Virtual reality in vocational training of people with learning disabilities. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b64de5620aca09252a468f8a101228d79d840a7.

  • Roussou, M. (2000). Immersive interactive virtual reality and informal education. In Proceedings of user interfaces for all: interactive learning environments for children (pp. 1–9).

  • Schlechtinger, M. (2020). What are you looking at? Using eye tracking to improve learning in virtual environments. Universitätsbibliothek Siegen. https://doi.org/10.25819/UBSI/2762.

  • Sun, J., Li, H., Liu, Z., Cai, S., & Li, X. (2017). An empirical case on integration of immersive virtual environment into primary school science class. In Proceedings of 25th international conference on computers in education (ICCE) (pp. 566–575).

  • Tzanavari, A., Charalambous-Darden, N., Herakleous, K., & Poullis, C. (2015). Effectiveness of an immersive virtual environment (CAVE) for teaching pedestrian crossing to children with PDD-NOS. In 2015 IEEE 15th international conference on advanced learning technologies. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icalt.2015.85.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Empact for their valuable input.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from SG Enable's Tote Board Enabling Lives Initiative (“TEBLI”) Grant that was awarded to Digital Dream.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shawn Zheng Kai Tan or Lilian Nguan Sim Tay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

LNST and SZKT are affiliated with Digital Dream, a company that provides I2MR solutions and related services. Empact, which did some data collection and interviews, were hired by Digital Dream to conduct said surveys and interviews.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10758_2023_9648_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Supplementary Figure 1: Timeline of surveys and interviews. Supplementary Figure 2: Templates given to schools to use. Supplementary Figure 3: Immersive interactive mixed reality content used by schools.Supplementary Figure 4: Semi-structured interview scripts used. Supplementary Figure 5: Statistical tests summary. Supplementary Figure 6: Summary statistics. (PDF 862 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, S.Z.K., Shendyapina, M. & Tay, L.N.S. Evaluating the Use of Immersive Interactive Mixed Reality (I2MR) Technology in Special Needs Education in Singapore. Tech Know Learn 29, 781–802 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09648-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09648-8

Keywords

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy