Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teacher Professional Development and Student Reading Comprehension Outcomes: The Heterogeneity of Responsiveness to Text Structure Instruction in Grade 2

  • Original research
  • Published:
Technology, Knowledge and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current research examines Grade 2 student responsiveness to teacher implementation of text structure lessons after an online professional development event. We trained 39 teachers on text structure knowledge and implementation fidelity using massively open online virtual learning platforms. The teachers were later given access to text structure lesson materials to deliver the lessons to their Grade 2 students. A total of 929 Grade 2 students’ reading comprehension knowledge at the pre- and post-teacher-implementation was examined. Latent class analysis (LCA) suggested that nearly 60% percent of students had a high possibility of scoring at a higher level on main idea questions on the post-test test than at the pretest. The classification of these three students was not associated with teacher fidelity after controlling for prior reading comprehension and signaling words knowledge, perhaps because the implementation itself can benefit student reading comprehension irrespective of fidelity. We suggest that the text structure professional development is associated with reading comprehension knowledge improvement for most students and offered suggestions for differentiating text structure instruction for students at different reading levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, G. J., Nelson, J. R., Stage, S. A., & Ralston, N. C. (2011). The influence of fidelity of implementation on the reading outcomes of middle school students experiencing reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaerds-Hazenberg, S. T., Evers-Vermeul, J., & van den Bergh, H. (2021). A meta-analysis on the effects of text structure instruction on reading comprehension in the upper elementary grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, 435–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. (1983). Stages of reading development. McGraw-Hill.

  • Ji, X. R., Beerwinkle, A., Wijekumar, K., Lei, P., Joshi, M., R., & Zhang, S. (2018). Using latent transition analysis to identify effects of an intelligent tutoring system on reading comprehension of seventh-grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31, 2095–2113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambright, K., Zhang, S., Hudson, A., Owens, J., Wijekumar, K., McKeown, D., & Moore, K. A. (2021, September). Symposium paper session: Changing Teacher Pedagogical Knowledge and Content Knowledge About Reading Comprehension Using Web-Based Professional Development. Paper presented at the meeting of Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE).

  • Meyer, B. J. (1975). Identification of the structure of prose and its implications for the study of reading and memory. Journal of Reading Behavior, 7, 7–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. J. F. (1987). Following the author’s top-level organization: An important skill for reading comprehension. In R. J. Tierney, P. L. Anders, & J. Nichols Mitchell (Eds.), Understanding readers’ understanding: Theory and practice (pp. 59–76). Erlbaum.

  • Meyer, B. J., & Poon, L. W. (2001). Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. J., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). Routledge.

  • Sun, X., Marks, R. A., Eggleston, R. L., Zhang, K., Lau, C., Yu, C. L., & Kovelman, I. (2023). Impacts of the COVID-19 disruption on the language and literacy development of monolingual and heritage bilingual children in the United States. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 36, 347–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, C., Bratsch-Hines, M., Aiken, H., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2021). Elementary teachers’ intervention fidelity in relation to reading and vocabulary outcomes for students at risk for reading-related disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54, 484–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijekumar, K. K., Meyer, B. J., & Lei, P. (2012). Large-scale randomized controlled trial with 4th graders using intelligent tutoring of the structure strategy to improve nonfiction reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 987–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijekumar, K., Meyer, K., B. J. F., & Lei, P. (2017). Web-based text structure strategy instruction improves seventh graders’ content area reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 741–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijekumar, K., Beerwinkle, A., McKeown, D., Zhang, S., & Joshi, R. M. (2020). The GIST of the reading comprehension problem in grades 4 and 5. Dyslexia, 26, 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijekumar, K., Zhang, S., Joshi, R. M., & Peti-Stantic, A. (2021). Introduction to the special issue: Textbook content and organization—why it matters to reading comprehension in elementary grades? Technology Knowledge and Learning, 26, 243–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. P. (2003). Teaching text structure to improve reading comprehension. In H. L. Swanson, & K. R. Harris,Graham S. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 293–305). The Guilford Press.

  • Williams, J. P. (2005). Instruction in reading comprehension for primary-grade students: A focus on text structure. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. P. (2008). Explicit instruction can help primary students learn to comprehend expository text. İn C. C. Block and S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension processes: Research-based best practices (2nd edition). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Zhang, S., Wijekumar, K., & Han, B. (2021). An analysis of grade 4 reading textbooks used in mainland China: Do the texts and activities support higher order reading comprehension skills? Technology Knowledge and Learning, 26, 251–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Owens, J., & Wijekumar, K. (2023, February). The Effectiveness of Online Professional Development on Text Structure Strategy on Student Reading Comprehension Outcomes. Paper presented at the meeting of Pacific Coast Research Conference, Coronado, California.

Download references

Funding

The grant number was U423A180074 (PI: Kausalai Wijekumar). Funded by the U.S. Department of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuai Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Wijekumar, K. Teacher Professional Development and Student Reading Comprehension Outcomes: The Heterogeneity of Responsiveness to Text Structure Instruction in Grade 2. Tech Know Learn 29, 1331–1345 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09693-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09693-3

Keywords

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy