Abstract
Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory of human learning describes learning as a social process and the origination of human intelligence in society or culture in which the social and cultural context of development cannot be separated. The sociocultural theory of mind attempts to explain the processes through which learning and development occur. A tenet of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory is the zone of proximal development (ZPD), which is used as a measure of the distance between what a learner is able to do and a proximal level that they might attain through guidance and collaboration with a more knowledgeable other. The ZPD is important in both education and psychology. By understanding how ZPD and a teacher’s ZPD (TZPD) function, teachers and professional development (PD) trainers can be better prepared to create meaningful learning opportunities which maximize the tools and strategies available to educators, thus further improving student learning outcomes. The absence of current research on TZPD, especially in regard to reading comprehension instruction, results in the lack of evidence for how teachers develop TZPD and use evidence-based reading comprehension strategies in classroom instruction. The goal of this study was to investigate previous research conducted regarding Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development and its implications for preservice and in-service teachers through what has been termed teachers’ zone of proximal development. A systematic literature search identified studies tied to ZPD and TZPD. After screening and elimination, 13 studies were selected and reviewed for study design, theoretical framework, constructs being investigated, and the impact of methods used to collect data related to ZPD and TZPD.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/080e1/080e1861be763c3924942e7be0372f0c563c771f" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–483.
Ash, D., & Levitt, K. (2003). Working within the zone of proximal development: Formative assessment as professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(1), 23–48.
Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn. Routledge.
Cole, M. & Cole, S. (2001). The Development of Children. 4th Ed. New York: Scientific American Books. Distributed by W.N. Freeman and Company Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and Pedagogy. NY: Routledge/Falmer
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
Elhussain, S., & Khojah, A. (2020). Collaborative reflection on shared journal writing to foster EFL teacher CPD. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science., 15(2), 271–281.
Fani, T., & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Implications of Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development (ZPD) in teacher education: ZPTD and self-scaffolding. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1549–1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.396
Kuusisaari, H. (2014). Teachers at the zone of proximal development–Collaboration promoting or hindering the development process. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.06.001
Lempert-Shepell, E. (1995). Teacher self-identification in culture from Vygotsky’s developmental perspective. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 26, 425–442.
McCullagh, J. (2012). How can video-supported reflection enhance teachers’ professional development? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9396-0
Murphy, C., Scantlebury, K., & Milne, C. (2015). Using Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development to propose and test an explanatory model for conceputalising coteaching in preservice science teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2015.1060291
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
Reiman, R. J. (1999). The evolution of the social role-taking and guided reflection framework in teacher education: Recent theory and quantitative synthesis of research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 597–612.
Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers’ professional development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237.
Smagorinsky, P. (2013). What does Vygotsky provide for the 21st-century language arts teacher? Language Arts, 90(3), 192–204.
*Torres, M.N. (1996) Teacher researchers in the zone of proximal development: Insights for teacher education, report, 1–13.
Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Kluwer Academic.
Van Wyk, G., & De Beer, J. (2019). Bridging the theory–practice divide: Life sciences student teachers’ perceptions of teaching in communities of practice at a teaching school. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 23(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1658454
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cole M., John-Steiner V., Scribner S., & Souberman E. (Eds), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. MIT Press.
Warford, M. (2011). The zone of proximal teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 252–258.
Wennergren, A. (2016). Teachers as learners–with a little help from a critical friend. Educational Action Research, 24(2), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1058170
White P. (1998) Understanding prolepsis through teacher research. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research. 11: 56. doi https://doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1249
*Wu, Z. (2004). Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University. Texas A&M University. Available electronically from https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/1218.
Funding
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through grant U423A180074 to Texas A&M University. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No conflicts declared.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lambright, K. The Effect of a Teacher’s Mindset on the Cascading Zones of Proximal Development: A Systematic Review. Tech Know Learn 29, 1313–1329 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09696-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09696-0