Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Challenges and requirements for developing data architecture supporting integration of sustainable supply chains

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information asymmetry between consumers and supply chain actors represents a major barrier to the expansion of sustainable consumption. Developing an interoperable data architecture that enables the integration of data regarding sustainability practices from disparate sources in sustainable supply chains is important for improving market transparency. This paper identifies main issues and requirements as perceived by the key stakeholders in the coffee supply chain for such development. The analysis reveals that building an interoperable data architecture necessitates awareness of several major challenges, including the difficulties of collecting accurate and creditable data, limited technological capabilities, complex data ownership and disclosure policy, issues of confidentiality, privacy and economic value of information, and cost of disclosing information. To deal with these challenges, we recommend that the development need to ensure data quality, integrity and security, design information policy balancing commercial interests and openness, and design appropriate governance mechanism to complement the technological design in order to ensure the fair and proper use of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Raynolds et al. [48].

  2. A more detailed description of challenges for the stakeholders of sustainably certified coffee supply chain is [50, 51].

References

  1. Linton JD, Klassen R, Jayaraman V (2007) Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. J Oper Manag 25:1075–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fuchs DA, Lorek S (2005) Sustainable consumption governance: a history of promises and failures. J Consum Policy 28:261–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mont O, Plepys A (2008) Sustainable consumption progress: Should we be proud or alarmed? J Clean Prod 16:531–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Seyfang G (2005) Shopping for sustainability: Can sustainable consumption promote ecological citizenship? Environ Polit 14:290–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14:57–74

  6. Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26:301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84:488–500

  8. Mishra DP, Heide JB, Cort SG (1998) Information asymmetry and levels of agency relationships. J Mark Res 35:277–295

  9. Jahn G, Schramm M, Spiller A (2005) The reliability of certification: quality labels as a consumer policy tool. J Consum Policy 28:53–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Luna-Reyes L, Zhang J, Whitmore A et al (2014) Full information product pricing: an information strategy for harnessing consumer choice to create a more sustainable world. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 34:1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graham M, Haarstad H (2011) Transparency and development: ethical consumption through Web 2.0 and the internet of things. Inf Technol Int Dev 7:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  12. Watts S, Wyner G (2011) Designing and theorizing the adoption of mobile technology-mediated ethical consumption tools. Inf Technol People 24:257–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jarman H, Luna-Reyes LF, Zhang J, Whitmore A, Picazo-Vela S, Andersen DL, Tayi GK, Pardo TA, Andersen DF, Sayogo DS (2011) I-Choose: consumer choice, digital government, and sustainability in North America. Presented at the APPAM Research Conference, Washington, DC

  14. Vachon S, Klassen R (2007) Supply chain management and environmental technologies: the role of integration. Int J Prod Res 45:401–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Darby MR, Karni E (1973) Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J Law Econ 16:67–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nelson P (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J Polit Econ 78:311–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Angell LC, Klassen RD (1999) Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: an agenda for research in operations management. J Oper Manag 17:575–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matos S, Hall J (2007) Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: the case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology. J Oper Manag 25:1083–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sarkis J, Zhu Q, Lai K (2011) An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int J Prod Econ 130:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2004) Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J Oper Manag 22:265–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hsu C-C, Tan KC, Zailani SHM, Jayaraman V (2013) Supply chain drivers that foster the development of green initiatives in an emerging economy. Int J Oper Prod Manag 33:656–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolf J (2011) Sustainable supply chain management integration: a qualitative analysis of the German manufacturing industry. J Bus Ethics 102:1–15

  23. Collins CM, Steg L, Koning MAS (2007) Customers’values, beliefs on sustainable corporate performance, and buying behavior. Psychol Mark 24:555–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Locke R, Romis M (2007) Improving work conditions in a global supply chain. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 48:54–61

    Google Scholar 

  25. Locke R, Kochan T, Romis M, Qin F (2007) Beyond corporate codes of conduct: work organization and labour standards at Nike’s suppliers. Int Labour Rev 146:21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Opara LU (2003) Traceability in agriculture and food supply chain: a review of basic concepts, technological implications, and future prospects. J Food Agric Environ 1:101–106

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wilson TP, Clarke WR (1998) Food safety and traceability in the agricultural supply chain: using the Internet to deliver traceability. Supply Chain Manag Int J 3:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bardhan IR, Demirkan H, Kannan PK, Kauffman RJ, Sougstad R (2010) An interdisciplinary perspective on IT services management and service science. J Manag Inf Syst 26:13–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lyons AC, Coronado Mondragon AE, Bremang A, Kehoe DF, Coleman J (2005) Prototyping an information system’s requirements architecture for customer-driven, supply-chain operations. Int J Prod Res 43:4289–4319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu LD (2011) Information architecture for supply chain quality management. Int J Prod Res 49:183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Klein R, Rai A (2009) Interfirm strategic information flows in logistics supply chain relationships. MIS Q 33:735–762

    Google Scholar 

  32. Steinfield C, Markus ML, Wigand RT (2011) Through a glass clearly: standards, architecture, and process transparency in global supply chains. J Manag Inf Syst 28:75–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Malhotra A, Gosain S, Sawy OAE (2005) Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. Mis Q 29:145–187

  34. Bayat A, Sundararajan S, Gustafson HR Jr, Zimmers EW Jr (2011) Sustainably driven supply chains. Ind Eng 43:26–31

    Google Scholar 

  35. Davis C, Nikolic I, Dijkema GP (2010) Industrial Ecology 2.0. J Ind Ecol 14:707–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mishra BK, Raghunathan S, Yue X (2007) Information sharing in supply chains: incentives for information distortion. IIE Trans 39:863–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Clemons EK, Row MC (1993) Limits to interfirm coordination through information technology: results of a field study in consumer packaged goods distribution. J Manag Inf Syst 10:73–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Johnston HR, Vitale MR (1988) Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information systems. MIS Q 12:153–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Han K, Chang YB, Hahn J (2011) Information technology spillover and productivity: the role of information technology intensity and competition. J Manag Inf Syst 28:115–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mont O, Bleischwitz R (2007) Sustainable consumption and resource management in the light of life cycle thinking. Eur Environ 17:59–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lebel L, Lorek S (2008) Enabling sustainable production-consumption systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 33:241–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Srivastava SK (2007) Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. Int J Manag Rev 9(1):53–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pardo TA, Burke GB (2008) Improving government interoperability: a capability framework for government managers. Center for Technology in Government

  44. Pardo TA, Gil-Garcia JR, Burke GB (2008) Sustainable cross-boundary information sharing. In: Chen H, Brandt L, Gregg V, Traunmuller R, Dawes SS, Hovy E, Macintosh A, Larson CA (eds) Digital government: advanced research and case studies, and implementation. Springer, New York, pp 421–438

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  46. Stake RE (2006) Multiple case study analysis. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods, vol 5, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  48. Raynolds L, Murray D, Heller A (2007) Regulating sustainability in the coffee sector: a comparative analysis of third-party environmental and social certification initiatives. Agric Hum Values 24:147–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Gereffi G, Humphrey J, Sturgeon T (2005) The governance of global value chains. Rev Int Polit Econ 12:78–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sayogo DS (2013) Modeling incentives to disclose: smart disclosure policy, private sector transparency and demanded disclosure (Dissertation). University at Albany State University of New York, Albany, NY

  51. Sayogo DS, Jarman H, Whitmore A, Tayi GK, Zhang J, Hrdinova J, Pardo TA, Andersen DF, Luna-Reyes LF, Tan X, Andersen DL (2012) A stakeholder analysis of interoperable data architecture: the case of I-Choose. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual international conference on digital government research, Dg.o’12. Presented at the dg.o, ACM, Albany, NY, USA, pp 145–154

  52. Rindfleisch TC (1997) Privacy, information technology, and health care. ACM Commun 40(8):92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Stiglitz JE (2000) The contributions of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. Q J Econ 115:1441–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Vurro C, Russo A, Perrini F (2009) Shaping sustainable value chains: network determinants of supply chain governance models. J Bus Ethics 90(4):607–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Donahue JD, Zeckhauser RJ (2011) Collaborative governance: private roles for public goals in turbulent times. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sabel CF, Zeitlin J (2008) Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. Eur Law J 14(3):271–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sabel CF, Zeitlin J (eds) (2010) Experimentalist governance in the European Union: towards a new architecture. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  58. Abbott K, Snidal D (2009) The governance triangle: regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In: Mattli W, Woods N (eds) The politics of global regulation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 44–88

  59. Héritier A, Lehmkuhl D (2008) The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance. J Public Policy 28(01):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  60. Jiang B (2009) Implementing supplier codes of conduct in global supply chains: process explanations from theoretic and empirical perspectives. J Bus Ethics 85(1):77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lim SJ, Phillips J (2008) Embedding CSR values: the global footwear industry’s evolving governance structure. J Bus Ethics 81(1):143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S (2012) An integrative framework for collaborative governance. J Public Adm Res Theor 22(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Horne RE (2009) Limits to labels: the role of eco-labels in the assessment of product sustainability and routes to sustainable consumption. Int J Consum Stud 33:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Davies J, Fensel D, Van Harmelen F (2003) Towards the semantic web. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  65. Lumsden J, Hall H, Cruickshank P (2011) Ontology definition and construction, and epistemological adequacy for systems interoperability: a practitioner analysis. J Inf Sci 37:246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Luna-Reyes, LF, Andersen DF, Andersen DL, Derrick D, Jarman H (2012) Full information product pricing (FIPP) regimes: policy implications for US–Mexico sustainable commerce. 3rd annual Puentes consortium symposium on the Mexico-US Border, Rice University, Houston

  67. Ansell C, Gash A (2007) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory 18(4):543–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Muhammadiyah at Malang, Malang, Indonesia

    Djoko Sigit Sayogo

  2. Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, Albany, NY, USA

    Djoko Sigit Sayogo & Theresa A. Pardo

  3. Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA

    Jing Zhang

  4. Universidad de las Americas Puebla, Cholula, Mexico

    Luis Luna-Reyes

  5. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Holly Jarman

  6. University at Albany, Albany, NY, USA

    Giri Tayi, Deborah Lines Andersen & David F. Andersen

Authors
  1. Djoko Sigit Sayogo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luis Luna-Reyes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Holly Jarman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giri Tayi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Deborah Lines Andersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Theresa A. Pardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. David F. Andersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Djoko Sigit Sayogo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sayogo, D.S., Zhang, J., Luna-Reyes, L. et al. Challenges and requirements for developing data architecture supporting integration of sustainable supply chains. Inf Technol Manag 16, 5–18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0203-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0203-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy