Abstract
A review of the current air traffic control system is undertaken from the perspective of human centered design, focusing on the development of today’s system, the problems in today’s system, and the challenges going forward. Today’s system evolved around the operators in the system (mainly air traffic controllers and pilots), rather than being designed based on specific engineering analyses. This human centered focus has helped make air transportation remarkably safe, but has also made the air traffic control system somewhat inscrutable. This opaqueness of how the system operates poses significant problems for current attempts to transform the system into its “next generation” with significantly improved capacity. Research advances in human centered computing research required in order for this transformation work to proceed are discussed, specifically advances in computing the safety of complex human-integrated systems, understanding and measuring situation awareness, and visualizations of complex data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barhydt, R., Eischeid, T. M., Palmer, M. T., & Wing, D. J. (2003). Use of a prototype airborne separation assurance system for resolving near-term conflicts during autonomous aircraft operations. Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Austin, TX, USA, AIAA.
Battiste V., Johnson W. W., Johnson N. H., Granada S., Dao A. (2007) Flight crew perspective on the display of 4D information for en route and arrival merging and spacing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4551: 541
Bilimoria K. D., Sheth K. S., Lee H. Q., Grabbe S. R. (2003) Performance evaluation of airborne separation assurance for free flight. Air Traffic Control Quarterly 11: 85–102
Brooker P. (2005) STCA, TCAS, airproxes and collision risk. Journal of Navigation 58: 389–404
Civil Aeronautics Board (1957) Accident investigation report, report #SA-320. Washington, DC.: Civil Aeronautics Board
Drury, C. G. (1994). Function allocation in manufacturing. In Proceedings of the Ergonomics Society’s 1994 Annual Conference. University of Warwick, England, Taylor & Francis.
Endsley M. R. (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37: 32–64
Endsley M.R., Bolté B., Jones D.G. (2003) Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered design. Taylor & Francis, UK
Erzberger, H. (2001). The automated airspace concept. 4th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Santa Fe, NM.
Erzberger, H., Davis, T. J., & Green, S. M. (1993). Design of center-TRACON automation system. AGARD Meeting on Machine Intelligence in Air Traffic Management, Berlin, Germany.
EUROCONTROL. (2007). Single European Sky ATM Research. EUROCONTROL.
Gordon R., Shorrock S. T., Pozzi S., Boschiero A. (2005) Predicting and simulating human errors in using the airborne separation assurance system procedure. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety 5: 43
Harel D. (2002) Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming 8: 231–274
Hwang S. L., Barfield W., Chang T. C., Salvendy G. (1984) Integration of humans and computers in the operation and control of flexible manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research 22: 841–856
Johnson W.W., Battiste V., Holland S. (2000) A cockpit display designed to enable limited flight deck separation responsibility. SAE Transactions Journal of Aerospace 108: 1041–1062
Joint Planning & Development Office (2004) Next generation air traffic control system integrated plan.Washington, DC.: Joint Planning & Development Office
Kaiser B., Gramlich C., Förster M. (2007) State/event fault trees—a safety analysis model for software-controlled systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 92: 1521–1537
Kesseler E., Knapen E. G. (2006) Towards human-centred design: Two case studies. Journal of Systems and Software 27: 301–313
Krozel, J., Peters, M., & Bilimoria, K. (2000). A decentralized control strategy for distributed air/ground traffic separation. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference.
Kuchar J. K., Yang L. C., Mit C. (2000) A review of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on 1: 179–189
Leveson N. (2004) A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science 42: 237–270
Ljundberg M., Lucas A. (1992) The OASIS air traffic management system, technical report #28. Australian Artificial Intelligence Institute, Melbourne
Mozdzanowska, A., Weibel, R., Lester, E., & Hansman, R. J. (2007). The dynamics of air transportation system transition. 2007 Air Traffic Management Conference, Barcelona, Spain.
NavCanada. (2003). SASS: Sequencing and Scheduling System, Ottawa.
National Transportation Safety Board (2008) US air carrier operations calendar year 2004, report #NTSB/ARC-08/01, annual review of aircraft accident data. Washington, DC.: National Transportation Safety Board
Nof S. Y., Knight J. L., Salvendy G. (1980) Effective utilization of industrial robots—a job and skills analysis approach. IIE Transactions 12: 216–225
Papantonopoulos S. A., Salvendy G. (2008) Analytic cognitive task allocation: A decision model for cognitive task allocation. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 9: 155–185
Parasuraman R., Sheridan T. B., Wickens C. D. (2008) Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 2: 140–160
Prevot T., Homola J., Mercer J. (2008) Human-in-the-loop evaluation of ground-based automated separation assurance for NEXTGEN, 8th AIAA AIrcraft Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. AIAA, Anchorage, Alaska
Robert G., Hockey J. (1997) Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology 45: 73–93
Salmon P. M., Stanton N. A., Walker G. H., Jenkins D., Baber C., McMaster R. (2008) Representing situation awareness in collaborative systems: A case study in the energy distribution domain. Ergonomics 51: 367–384
Sheridan T. B. (1998) Allocating functions rationally between humans and machines. Ergonomics in Design 6: 20–25
Shappell, S. A., Wiegmann, D. A., Hackworth, C. A., Detwiler, C. A., Holcomb, K. A., & Boquet, A. J. (2006). Human error and commercial aviation accidents: A comprehensive, fine-grained analysis using HFACS, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine. Available to the public through the Defense Technical Information Center; Available to the public through the National Technical Information Service.
Spence R. (2007) Information visualization: design for interaction. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Vijaykumar N. L., Carvalho S. V., Andrade V. M. B., Abdurahiman V. (2006) Introducing probabilities in Statecharts to specify reactive systems for performance analysis. Computers and Operations Research 33: 2369–2386
Ware C. (2004) Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
Wickens C. D., Prevett T. (1995) Exploring the dimensions of egocentricity in aircraft navigation displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 1: 110–135
Wiegmann D.A., Shappell S.A. (2003) A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system. Aldershot, Ashgate
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Landry, S.J. Human centered design in the air traffic control system. J Intell Manuf 22, 65–72 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0278-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0278-6