Abstract
The problem of aerial rendezvous of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) is considered. Beam rider approach, wherein the follower moves along a beam directed from a ground-based tracker onto the leader is proposed as a guidance strategy. Analytic guarantee for a resulting rendezvous between two same speed vehicles is derived from the line-of-sight guidance principles. Considering an approximate variation of the follower look-ahead angle, closed-form expressions are derived for time-to-rendezvous and follower lateral acceleration. Cooperative maneuvers are proposed for the leader minimizing the rendezvous engagement time. Guidance models are extended to 3D engagements and efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated by extensive 2D and 3D simulations. Simulation results are presented complying with the analytic findings. Robustness of the proposed approach is verified against uncompensated autopilot delays, non-identical initial speeds, and wind.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
William, R.D., Bernard, B.K., Don, M.B., Daniel, F.K.: Micro air vehicles for optical surveillance. J Lincoln Lab 9(2), 197–214 (1996)
Rathinam, S., Almeida, P., Kim, Z., Jackson, S., Tinka, A., Grossman, W., Sengupta, R.: Autonomous searching and tracking of a river using an UAV. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference (ACC), New York, pp 359–364 (2007)
Oh, H., Kim, S., Tsourdos, A., White, B.A.: Decentralised standoff tracking of moving targets using adaptive sliding mode control for UAVs. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 76(1), 169–183 (2014)
Sharma, R., Taylor, C.N.: Vision based distributed cooperative navigation for MAVs in GPS denied areas. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, AIAA 2009-1932 (2009)
Manathara, Joel G., Sujit, P.B., Beard, R.W.: Multiple UAV coalitions for a search and prosecute mission. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 62(1), 125–158 (2011)
Cortes, J., Martinez, S., Bullo, F.: Robust rendezvous for mobile autonomous agents via proximity graphs in arbitrary dimensions. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 51(8), 1289–1298 (2006)
Notarstefano, G., Bullo, F.: Distributed consensus on enclosing shapes and minimum time rendezvous. In: Proceedings of 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), San Diego, pp 4295–4300 (2006)
Hui, Q.: Finite-time rendezvous algorithms for mobile autonomous agents. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 56 (1), 207–211 (2011)
Lin, J., Morse, A.S., Anderson, B.D.O.: The multi-agent rendezvous problem. part 2: the asynchronous case. SIAM J. Control Optim. 46(6), 2120–2147 (2007)
Dimarogonas, D.V., Kyriakopoulos, K.J: On the rendezvous problem for multiple nonholonomic agents. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 52(5), 916–922 (2007)
Sun, Y.G., Wang, L.: Consensus problems in networks of agents with double-integrator dynamics and time-varying delays. Int. J. Control 82(10), 1937–1945 (2009)
Zhu, W., Jiang, Z.P., Feng, G.: Event-based consensus of multi-agent systems with general linear models. Automatica 50, 552–558 (2014)
Jin, Z., Shima, T., Schumacher, C.J.: Optimal scheduling for refueling multiple autonomous aerial vehicles. IEEE Trans. Robot. 22(4), 682–693 (2006)
Oh, H., Kim, S., Shin, H.S., White, B.A., Tsourdos, A., Rabbath, C.A.: Rendezvous and standoff target tracking guidance using differential geometry. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 69(1–4), 389–405 (2013)
Cao, J., Zeng, Z., Yao, B., Lian, L.: Toward optimal rendezvous of multiple underwater gliders: 3D path planning with combined sawtooth and spiral motion. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 85(1), 189–206 (2017)
Manathara, J.G., Ghose, D.: Rendezvous of multiple UAVs with collision avoidance using consensus. J. Aero. Eng. 25(4), 480–489 (2012)
Ratnoo, A., Ghose, D.: Impact angle constrained interception of nonstationary nonmaneuvering targets. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 33(1), 269–275 (2010)
Erer, K.S., Merttopcuoglu, O.: Indirect impact-angle-control against stationary targets using biased pure proportional navigation. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 35(2), 700–703 (2012)
Smith, A.L.: Proportional navigation with adaptive terminal guidance for aircraft rendezvous. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 31(6), 1832–1835 (2008)
Yamasaki, T., Balakrishnan, S.N.: Sliding mode-based pure pursuit guidance for unmanned aerial vehicle rendezvous and chase with a cooperative aircraft. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G- J. Aero. Eng. 224(10), 1057–1066 (2010)
Campa, G., Napolitano, M.R., Fravolini, M.L.: Simulation environment for machine vision based aerial refueling for UAVs. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 45(1), 138–151 (2009)
Ratnoo, A.: Variable deviated pursuit for rendezvous guidance. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 38(4), 787–792 (2015)
Shneydor, N.A.: Line-of-sight guidance. In: Missile Guidance and Pursuit, pp 36–38. Horwood Publ., Chichster (1998)
Ha, I.J., Chong, S.: Design of a CLOS guidance law via feedback linearization. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 28(1), 51–63 (1992)
Ratnoo, A., Shima, T.: Line of sight interceptor guidance for defending an aircraft. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 34(2), 522–532 (2011)
Yamasaki, T., Balakrishnan, S.N.: Modified command to line-of-sight intercept guidance for aircraft defense. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 36(3), 898–902 (2013)
Ratnoo, A.: Three-point guidance for intercepting weaving targets. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 39(8), 1879–1884 (2016)
Anjaly, P., Ratnoo, A.: A beam rider concept for three point aerial rendezvous guidance. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, San Diego, AIAA 2016–2108 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parayil, A., Ratnoo, A. Cooperative Beam-Rider Guidance for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Rendezvous. J Intell Robot Syst 95, 585–599 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-018-0873-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-018-0873-x