Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A new reduced-reference image quality assessment based on the SVD signal projection

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new image quality metric is proposed in this paper based on the degradation of structural information. It uses the singular value decomposition (SVD) as a structural projection tool called SVD-based reduced-reference image quality evaluator (SBR-IQE). This method employs the SVD signal projection to factorize the reference image matrix as well as its distorted version into their components including singular vectors and values. The singular vectors contain structural information and singular values determine the importance of each singular vector in the image structure. Thus, the minutiae perceptual information could be eliminated by singular values diagnosis. The remaining components are considered as the image features. The task of similarity measurement includes three comparisons based on luminance, contrast and structure. The overall quality evaluation is obtained according to these three comparisons. Experimental results have demonstrated that the proposed metric outperforms the state-of-the-art RR-IQA metrics and enjoys lower computational cost as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhateja V, Kalsi A, Srivastava A (2015) Image similarity metric (ISIM): a reduced reference image quality assessment approach. CSI Trans ICT 3(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carnec M, Le Callet P, Barba D (2003) An image quality assessment method based on perception of structural information. In: Image processing, 2003. ICIP 2003. Proceedings. 2003 international conference on (Vol. 3, pp III-185)

  3. Carnec M, Le Callet P, Barba D (2005) Visual features for image quality assessment with reduced reference. In: Image processing, 2005. ICIP 2005. IEEE international conference on (Vol. 1, pp I-421)

  4. Chen MJ, Bovik AC (2011) No-reference image blur assessment using multiscale gradient. EURASIP J Image Video Process 2011(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chono K, Lin YC, Varodayan D, Miyamoto Y, Girod B (2008) Reduced-reference image quality assessment using distributed source coding. In: Multimedia and expo, 2008 I.E. international conference on (pp 609–612)

  6. Daly S (1993) The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. Digit Images Hum Vis 4:124–125

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eckert MP, Bradley AP (1998) Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression. Signal Process 70(3):177–200

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Eskicioglu AM, Fisher PS (1995) Image quality measures and their performance. IEEE Trans Commun 43(12):2959–2965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Wang,(2001) Rate scalable foveated image and video communications. PhD thesis, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas at Austin

  10. Girod B (1993) What's wrong with mean-squared error? In: Watson AB (ed) Digital images and human vision. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 207–220

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hu A, Zhang R, Zhan X, Yin D (2011) Image quality assessment incorporating the interaction of spatial and spectral sensitivities of hvs. In: Proc. 13th IASTED int. conf. on signal and image processing (pp 1–7)

  12. Kakarala R, Ogunbona PO (2001) Signal analysis using a multiresolution form of the singular value decomposition. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(5):724–735

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuo TY, Su PC, Tsai CM (2016) Improved visual information fidelity based on sensitivity characteristics of digital images. J Vis Commun Image Represent 40:76–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kusuma TM, Zepernick HJ (2003) A reduced-reference perceptual quality metric for in-service image quality assessment. In: Mobile future and symposium on trends in communications, 2003. SympoTIC’03. Joint first workshop on (pp 71–74)

  15. Larson EC, Chandler DM Categorial image quality (CSIQ) database. (Online) Available http://vision.okstate.edu/csiq

  16. Le Callet P, Autrusseau F (2005) Subjective quality assessment Irccyn/IVC database. http://www2.irccyn.ec-nantes.fr/ivcdb/

  17. Liu L, Dong H, Huang H, Bovik AC (2014) No-reference image quality assessment in curvelet domain. Signal Process Image Commun 29(4):494–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu L, Liu B, Huang H, Bovik AC (2014) No-reference image quality assessment based on spatial and spectral entropies. Signal Process Image Commun 29(8):856–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu D, Xu Y, Quan Y, Le Callet P (2014) Reduced reference image quality assessment using regularity of phase congruency. Signal Process Image Commun 29(8):844–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu D, Xu Y, Quan Y, Yu Z, Le Callet P (2015) Directional regularity for visual quality estimation. Signal Process 110:211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mansouri A, Aznaveh AM, Torkamani-Azar F, Jahanshahi JA (2009) Image quality assessment using the singular value decomposition theorem. Opt Rev 16(2):49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mittal A, Soundararajan R, Bovik AC (2013) Making a “completely blind” image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal Process Lett 20(3):209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Narwaria M, Lin W (2012) SVD-based quality metric for image and video using machine learning. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Part B (Cybernetics) 42(2):347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ponomarenko N, Egiazarrian K Tampere image database 2008 TID2008. (Online) Available http://www.ponomarenko.info/tid2008.htm

  25. Rehman A, Wang Z (2012) Reduced-reference image quality assessment by structural similarity estimation. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(8):3378–3389

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Rostami M, Michailovich O, Wang Z (2012) Image deblurring using derivative compressed sensing for optical imaging application. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(7):3139–3149

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Saha A, Wu QJ (2013) Perceptual image quality assessment using phase deviation sensitive energy features. Signal Process 93(11):3182–3191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shahid M, Rossholm A, Lövström B, Zepernick HJ (2014) No-reference image and video quality assessment: a classification and review of recent approaches. EURASIP J Image Video Process 2014(1):40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sheikh HR, Seshadrinathan K, Moorthy K, Wang Z, Bovik AC, Cormack LK Image and video quality assessment research at LIVE. (Online) Available http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality

  30. Shnayderman A, Gusev A, Eskicioglu AM (2006) An SVD-based grayscale image quality measure for local and global assessment. IEEE Trans Image Process 15(2):422–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Soundararajan R, Bovik AC (2012) RRED indices: Reduced reference entropic differencing for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(2):517–526

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Teo PC, Heeger DJ (1994) Perceptual image distortion. In: Image processing, 1994. Proceedings. ICIP-94., IEEE international conference (Vol. 2, pp 982–986)

  33. Wang Z (2011) Applications of objective image quality assessment methods [applications corner]. IEEE Signal Process Mag 28(6):137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Z, Simoncelli EP (2005, January) Reduced-reference image quality assessment using a wavelet-domain natural image statistic model. Hum Vis Electron Imaging 5666:149–159

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Lu L (2002) Why is image quality assessment so difficult? In: Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2002 I.E. International Conference on (Vol. 4, pp IV-3313)

  36. Wang Z, Simoncelli EP, Bovik AC (2003) Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In: Signals, systems and computers, 2004. Conference record of the thirty-seventh Asilomar conference on (Vol. 2, pp 1398–1402)

  37. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang S, Deng C, Lin W, Zhao B, Chen J (2013) A novel SVD-based image quality assessment metric. In: Image Processing (ICIP), 2013 20th IEEE international conference on (pp 423–426)

  39. Winkler S (1999) Perceptual distortion metric for digital color video. In: Human vision and electronic imaging (pp 175–184)

  40. Wu J, Lin W, Shi G, Liu A (2013) Reduced-reference image quality assessment with visual information fidelity. IEEE Trans Multimed 15(7):1700–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wu J, Lin W, Fang Y, Li L, Shi G, Niwas I (2016) Visual structural degradation based reduced-reference image quality assessment. Signal Process Image Commun 47:16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yalman Y (2014) Histogram based perceptual quality assessment method for color images. Comput Stand Interfaces 36(6):899–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang Y, Wu J, Shi G, Xie X, Niu Y, Fan C (2015) Reduced-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on Discrete Cosine Transform Entropy. IEICE Trans Fundam Electron Commun Comput Sci 98(12):2642–2649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang Y, Wu J, Xie X, Li L, Shi G (2016) Blind image quality assessment with improved natural scene statistics model. Digit Signal Process 57:56–65

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu X, Milanfar P (2009) A no-reference sharpness metric sensitive to blur and noise. In: Quality of multimedia experience, 2009. QoMEx 2009. International workshop on (pp 64–69)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

    Ehsanhosein Kalatehjari & Farzin Yaghmaee

Authors
  1. Ehsanhosein Kalatehjari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Farzin Yaghmaee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzin Yaghmaee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalatehjari, E., Yaghmaee, F. A new reduced-reference image quality assessment based on the SVD signal projection. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 25053–25076 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-5757-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-5757-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy