Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Polygamy relations of multipartite systems

  • Published:
Quantum Information Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the polygamy relations of multipartite quantum states. General polygamy inequalities are given in the \(\alpha \)th \((\alpha \ge 2)\) power of concurrence of assistance, \(\beta \)th \((\beta \ge 1)\) power of entanglement of assistance, and the squared convex-roof extended negativity of assistance (SCRENoA).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, K.: Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Mintert, F., Kuś, M., Buchleitner, A.: Concurrence of mixed bipartite quantum states in arbitrary dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 167902 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, K., Albeverio, S., Fei, S.M.: Concurrence of arbitrary dimensional bipartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 040504 (2005)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Breuer, H.P.: Separability criteria and bounds for entanglement measures. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 39, 11847 (2006)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Breuer, H.P.: Optimal entanglement criterion for mixed quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 080501 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. de Vicente, J.I.: Lower bounds on concurrence and separability conditions. Phys. Rev. A 75, 052320 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, C.J., Zhang, Y.S., Zhang, S., Guo, G.C.: Optimal entanglement witnesses based on local orthogonal observables. Phys. Rev. A 76, 012334 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pawlowski, M.: Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of bells inequality violations. Phys. Rev. A 82, 032313 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coffman, V., Kundu, J., Wootters, W.K.: Distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wootters, W.K.: Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gour, G., Meyer, D.A., Sanders, B.C.: Deterministic entanglement of assistance and monogamy constraints. Phys. Rev. A 72, 042329 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, J.S.: Tsallis entropy and entanglement constraints in multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 81, 062328 (2010)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, J.S., Sanders, B.C.: Unified entropy, entanglement measures and monogamy of multiparty entanglement. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 44, 295303 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goura, G., Bandyopadhyayb, S., Sandersc, B.C.: Dual monogamy inequality for entanglement. J. Math. Phys. 48, 012108 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Buscemi, F., Gour, G., Kim, J.S.: Polygamy of distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 80, 012324 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, J.S.: General polygamy inequality of multiparty quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 85, 062302 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, J.S.: Tsallis entropy and general polygamy of multiparty quantum entanglement in arbitrary dimensions. Phys. Rev. A 94, 062338 (2016)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Jin, Z.X., Fei, S.M.: Tighter entanglement monogamy relations of qubit systems. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 77 (2017)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Jin, Z.X., Li, J., Li, T., Fei, S.M.: Tighter monogamy relations in multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 97, 032336 (2018)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu, X.N., Fei, S.M.: Entanglement monogamy relations of qubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 90, 024304 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kalaga, J.K., Leoński, W.: Quantum steering borders in three-qubit systems. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 175 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalaga, J.K., Leoński, W.: Quantum steering and entanglement in three-mode triangle Bose–Hubbard system. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 265 (2017)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Olsen, M.K.: Spreading of entanglement and steering along small Bose–Hubbard chains. Phys. Rev. A 92, 033627 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Deng, X., Xiang, Y., Tian, C., Adesso, G., He, Q.: Demonstration of monogamy relations for Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering in Gaussian cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 230501 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kalaga, J.K., Leoński, W.: Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering and coherence in the family of entangled three-qubit states. Phys. Rev. A 97, 042110 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, J.S.: Negativity and tight constraints of multiqubit entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 97, 012334 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim, J.S.: Weighted polygamy inequalities of multiparty entanglement in arbitrary-dimensional quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 97, 042332 (2018)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Guo, Y.: Any entanglement of assistance is polygamous. Quantum Inf. Process. 17, 222 (2018)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Uhlmann, A.: Fidelity and concurrence of conjugated states. Phys. Rev. A 62, 032307 (2000)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Rungta, P., Buz̆ek, V., Caves, C.M., Hillery, M., Milburn, G.J.: Universal state inversion and concurrence in arbitrary dimensions. Phys. Rev. A 64, 042315 (2001)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Albeverio, S., Fei, S.M.: A note on invariants and entanglements. J. Opt. B Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 3, 223 (2001)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Laustsen, T., Verstraete, F., Van Enk, S.J.: Local vs. joint measurements for the entanglement of assistance. Quantum Inf. Comput. 3, 64 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu, C.S., Song, H.S.: Entanglement monogamy of tripartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 77, 032329 (2008)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Osborne, T.J., Verstraete, F.: General monogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 220503 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bai, Y.K., Ye, M.Y., Wang, Z.D.: Entanglement monogamy and entanglement evolution in multipartite systems. Phys. Rev. A 80, 044301 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Akhtarshenas, S.J.: Concurrence vectors in arbitrary multipartite quantum systems. J. Phys. A 38, 6777 (2005)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim, J.S.: Polygamy of entanglement in multipartite quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 80, 022302 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Groblacher, S., Jennewein, T., Vaziri, A., Weihs, G., Zeilinger, A.: Experimental quantum cryptography with qutrits. New J. Phys. 8, 75 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Vidal, G., Werner, R.F.: Computable measure of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A. 65, 032314 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC) under Grants 11847209; 11675113 and 11635009; Key Project of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education under No. KZ201810028042; the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Peoples’ Republic of China (2015CB856703); and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant No. XDB23030100.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yuquan Road 19A, Beijing, 100049, China

    Zhi-Xiang Jin & Cong-Feng Qiao

  2. School of Mathematical Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China

    Shao-Ming Fei

  3. Max-Planck-Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, 04103, Germany

    Shao-Ming Fei

  4. CAS Center for Excellence in Particle Physics, Beijing, 100049, China

    Cong-Feng Qiao

Authors
  1. Zhi-Xiang Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shao-Ming Fei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cong-Feng Qiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhi-Xiang Jin, Shao-Ming Fei or Cong-Feng Qiao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, ZX., Fei, SM. & Qiao, CF. Polygamy relations of multipartite systems. Quantum Inf Process 18, 105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-019-2220-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-019-2220-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy